- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Not helmet to helmet
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:40 pm
That’s bull shite
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:40 pm to moock blackjack
Refs again bail SF out
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:41 pm to moock blackjack
This league is fricking garbage
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:43 pm to moock blackjack
It doesn’t have to be helmet to helmet. Why is 22 even initiating that hit. Their FB was going down all by himself.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:43 pm to Breadstick Gun
That was not a vicious hit
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:44 pm to Breadstick Gun
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/6/21 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:44 pm to moock blackjack
It’s head or neck area. Just stupid because the receiver ducked to make the catch, so naturally the DB did too. These rules put defenders in such bad situations. fricking joke
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:44 pm to Breadstick Gun
quote:
Why is 22 even initiating that hit.
Um because you have to tackle a guy in a sport called tackle football?
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:45 pm to Breadstick Gun
Bc if he doesn't the receiver can get up and run
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:45 pm to moock blackjack
It was helmet to helmet but it's not the DBs fault he's going low and the other guy decides to lower his head to take a helmet to helmet hit. That's bullshite.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:45 pm to Breadstick Gun
That's exactly what I was thinking. I get it's bang bang at real time but they'll call that every single time.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:45 pm to Breadstick Gun
22 pulled up as much as possible when the receiver went low. Absolute bullshite call and you see the ref wait to make the call when he realizes the stop was made.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:46 pm to ElRoos
quote:
the receiver ducked to make the catch, so naturally the DB did too. T
it's worse than that
the DB was already at that level and the offensive player initiated the contact
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:46 pm to Nguyener
Not if he's on the ground... touch him down. Fairly simple.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:46 pm to Saintsntigers04
If the guy is already falling to the ground, all you have to do it touch him. The hit was unecessary, and a dumbshit play. Players playing by leading with their heads is what gets us in trouble every time. No reason to hit the guy, it wasn't a first down.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:47 pm to deuce985
quote:
It was helmet to helmet but it's not the DBs fault he's going low and the other guy decides to lower his head to take a helmet to helmet hit. That's bullshite.
i still have never received an adequate explanation why this isn't an offensive foul. been waiting years
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:48 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
the guy is already falling to the ground, all you have to do it touch him.
What if your already going to the ground before the reciever??????
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:48 pm to moock blackjack
So, helmet to helmet is not the issue, apparently. It’s any forceable contact to the head it seems.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:50 pm to Nguyener
Ummm if he’s already on the ground you can just touch him and not hit him above the shoulders.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 2:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
Right. How the hell is the DB supposed to tackle him when the helmet is coming right at his chest?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News