- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
My problem with Tag's statement
Posted on 12/13/12 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 4:12 pm
Tags made the comment in his statement that the "Saints coaches and organization contaminated the evidence." If the NFL already had all the evidence they needed to make the punishments, how could the coaches and organization contaminate said evidence. Does anyone else believe he wanted to say that the media (in particular ESPN) contaminated the evidence, but he is too much of a coward to stand up to the cow that provides the milk?
3
Posted on 12/13/12 at 4:14 pm to SaintsSBXLIV
I just wanna say, you have fantastic spelling and grammar for a poster with only 5 posts.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 4:14 pm to SaintsSBXLIV
quote:
My problem with Tag's statement
Is you were expecting it to be truthful rather than a PR move designed to both defuse the battle with the players and protect Goodell from Vilma's lawsuit.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 4:14 pm to SaintsSBXLIV
I don't really buy into much of what Tags and Goodell say.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 4:21 pm to windshieldman
He had to say that there was clear evidence of a bounty system or he would be admitting that Vilma had a great case against Goodell. Herein lies the conflict of interest; because he is part of the law firm that represents Goodell in the Vilma defamation lawsuit.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 4:43 pm to Hoodoo Man
quote:
I just wanna say, you have fantastic spelling and grammar for a poster with only 5 posts
I second this. You need to post more, as this board, along with many others on this site, are in dire need of intellectuals.
ETA: The commish, along with his puppets, can rot in hell.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 12/14/12 at 4:13 am to Hoodoo Man
quote:
for a poster with only 5 posts.
I achieved my spelling and grammar skills from an education, not from posting on message boards. I have been lurking on these boards for years, only recently did I decide to create an account. Some days it bothers the heck out of me for people on this site to judge other people on how little they post. If anything the people with 999999999999999 lifetime posts are the individuals that should be judged for not getting away from the computer and enjoying life.
Posted on 12/14/12 at 11:12 am to SaintsSBXLIV
quote:
I achieved my spelling and grammar skills from an education, not from posting on message boards. I have been lurking on these boards for years, only recently did I decide to create an account. Some days it bothers the heck out of me for people on this site to judge other people on how little they post. If anything the people with 999999999999999 lifetime posts are the individuals that should be judged for not getting away from the computer and enjoying life.
Thanks for posting the words that I have wanted to read but was too lazy to login and do it myself!
Posted on 12/15/12 at 12:14 pm to jimwill
quote:
Thanks for posting the words that I have wanted to read but was too lazy to login and do it myself!
No problem.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 12:50 pm to SaintsSBXLIV
Whoa whoa whoa.
Surely you've noticed that the people who only post once a year tend to have bad spelling and grammar.
I was not putting you down.
Surely you've noticed that the people who only post once a year tend to have bad spelling and grammar.
I was not putting you down.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News