- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:19 pm to CocoLoco
quote:
you’re basing this off of the frickin nfl top 100 man. That list is garbage, always is. Find me all these writers claiming Landry is top 10
Athlon #10
NFL.com #11
What’s next, they don’t know shite and your trained eye knows way more than the rest of the football world?
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:24 pm to Kevin TheRant
Oh wow nfl has him at 11, cool link. Also, 11 isn’t top 10 chief.
Lmao what a fricking homer you are
Lmao what a fricking homer you are
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:54 pm to CocoLoco
Your argument was he’s not near top 15 and anybody who says otherwise is a “homer” and on crazy pills.
I just gave you countless legitimate reason on why it’s not crazy to think Landry is top 10.
I show you a list we’re players vote. You say that is meaningless, and that you look at stats.
I then play your game of stats and show you how he is legitimately a top 10 stats receiver. Then you say stats don’t matter, it’s your trained eye.
I show you a list where reputable sites argue that he is top ten. They don’t mean shite either.
And Yet you still come back with “you’re a homer.” Just admit you’re frickin wrong and move on. I’ve said all I needed to say so bring your “homer” shite and put it to bed.
I just gave you countless legitimate reason on why it’s not crazy to think Landry is top 10.
I show you a list we’re players vote. You say that is meaningless, and that you look at stats.
I then play your game of stats and show you how he is legitimately a top 10 stats receiver. Then you say stats don’t matter, it’s your trained eye.
I show you a list where reputable sites argue that he is top ten. They don’t mean shite either.
And Yet you still come back with “you’re a homer.” Just admit you’re frickin wrong and move on. I’ve said all I needed to say so bring your “homer” shite and put it to bed.
Posted on 8/18/18 at 6:02 am to drake20
quote:
The king of 10 catch, under 100 yards
J.Landry tied for 4th in TD's
Drake20 isn't legit.
Posted on 8/18/18 at 7:06 am to Kevin TheRant
If you wanna have him top 15 fine, I can at least see an argument for it. I’d have him about as high as 13 as low as 16-17ish. I’m strong on him not being top 10. I dunno how it’s knock on him to have him in the 15-20 range. Look at all the good WRs in this league. I’m just not about the... well his peers think he’s top 10 and better than guys like Mike because of a ratings show. PFF has Landry at #16 last year fwiw. The top 3 were Brown, Mike and Julio.
Posted on 8/18/18 at 7:14 am to CocoLoco
Jarvis averaged 100 catches, 1,000 yards, and 5.5 TDs, on a garbage arse team, with very average qb play. If you pair Jarvis with Brady, Brees, Rodgers.. he would be an absolute nightmare.
Posted on 8/18/18 at 7:19 am to PenguinPubes
He’s a limited player, man. It is what it is.
Useful player, limited skill set. I’ve seen many players put up monster stats with garbage QBs
Useful player, limited skill set. I’ve seen many players put up monster stats with garbage QBs
Posted on 8/18/18 at 7:58 am to drake20
quote:I bet u can’t name 5 WR who did more than Landry with trash QB’s.
The list is endless with WR ‘s who did more with trash QB’s
Posted on 8/18/18 at 8:39 am to CocoLoco
quote:
Useful player, limited skill set. I’ve seen many players put up monster stats with garbage QBs
Limited skill set=
#1 in catches
#1 in 3rd down conversions
#4 touchdowns
All with a qb they pulled out of a broadcast booth.
Do you just see a guy who’s on the smaller side for WR, that doesn’t have elite speed and automatically categorize him as limited?
Give me some examples of other wr putting monster stats consitantly with garbage qbs?
Posted on 8/18/18 at 9:20 am to CocoLoco
Jarvis is not a limited player at all. The Miami offense is just terrible and they've had bad QB play his entire career, yet he continues to put up huge numbers. The ONLY knock on Jarvis is his straight-line speed. That's it. He has no other weakness at all. Every single other attribute that people look at for WRs is very good-elite. The single most important attribute for a receiver is his hands and Jarvis has the best in the league, hands down. He also runs excellent routes and is very quick/shifty. He is a tough SOB that has a blue-collar attitude and work ethic and he has passion and love for the game. He is everything you want in a WR, minus the straight-line speed. Jarvis is a top 10 WR in the league right now. The only reason his yardage stats have been so low is because of the way Miami used him. Again, their offense is just terrible. Hopefully Cleveland will use him correctly and maximize his impact.
This post was edited on 8/18/18 at 9:28 am
Posted on 8/18/18 at 9:26 am to drake20
Agree with young drake20 to an extent.
Posted on 8/18/18 at 9:27 am to Kevin TheRant
Larry Fitzgerald
Josh gordon
Nuk Hopkins
Thielen/Diggs (Keenum is not good)
How do you define limited? What is his long? Is he a deep threat? What’s his route tree like? Etc etc etc
He’s isnt top 10 man. He just isn’t. He is limited. I’m done with this argument. I don’t give a shite how many catches he has. That’s his role. That’s what he does. Defenses don’t fear him like they do other WRs
Josh gordon
Nuk Hopkins
Thielen/Diggs (Keenum is not good)
How do you define limited? What is his long? Is he a deep threat? What’s his route tree like? Etc etc etc
He’s isnt top 10 man. He just isn’t. He is limited. I’m done with this argument. I don’t give a shite how many catches he has. That’s his role. That’s what he does. Defenses don’t fear him like they do other WRs
Posted on 8/18/18 at 10:18 am to CocoLoco
You really should start putting IMO after your statements. Because outside of the knowledgeable football world you are one of few idiotic people who think everybody is crazy for debating that Landry is top 10/15.
Also I thought players opinions didn’t matter? They don’t fear Landry but consistently vote him as top 10 wr????
Also I thought players opinions didn’t matter? They don’t fear Landry but consistently vote him as top 10 wr????
This post was edited on 8/18/18 at 10:20 am
Posted on 8/18/18 at 11:11 am to Kevin TheRant
I am an idiot for saying he’s not top 10. PFF tracks every play and had him as #16. Gonna call them idiots, too? If someone has him in the 10-15 range in cool with it. You’re calling me an idiot for having him in the 14-17 range, which is where I have him. Like it’s some kinda of crazy hot take. It isn’t.
Sweet. Good talk, man. We will go in circles over this. You said yourself you’d take Mike over him, everyone would. Yet you keep going back to some stupid nfl network top 100 list. It’s as meaningless as it gets.
Sweet. Good talk, man. We will go in circles over this. You said yourself you’d take Mike over him, everyone would. Yet you keep going back to some stupid nfl network top 100 list. It’s as meaningless as it gets.
This post was edited on 8/18/18 at 11:17 am
Posted on 11/6/18 at 1:04 pm to CocoLoco
Fun re-read aside from all the jarvis talk
Posted on 11/6/18 at 1:46 pm to CocoLoco
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 1:25 am
Popular
Back to top
