- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hypothetical: if Arvell Reese makes it to the Browns at Pick 6
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:02 pm
Does Loomis pull the trigger and trade up from 8 to 6? What does it cost? How melty would Saints Talk be?
It’s not likely but there’s tons of smoke about the top 4 being:
1. Mendoza
2. Bailey
3. Love
4. Styles
With Giants likely going Downs or maybe WR, that opens up Cleveland who has been more than open to trading back according to reports.
It’s not likely but there’s tons of smoke about the top 4 being:
1. Mendoza
2. Bailey
3. Love
4. Styles
With Giants likely going Downs or maybe WR, that opens up Cleveland who has been more than open to trading back according to reports.
6
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:03 pm to WicKed WayZ
8-6 shouldn’t be a super expensive move.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:04 pm to St Augustine
I'd be fine using a 3rd to get Reese at #6.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:10 pm to WicKed WayZ
Yes it would take a 3rd if purely going off trade value chart
But a team behind us might give them more, who knows
But a team behind us might give them more, who knows
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:12 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
With Giants likely going Downs or maybe WR
Not realistic with them having a 100% chance of getting one of those guys #10. They go Styles/ Bailey/ Reese at #5.
Atleast (1) of Downs/ Delane/ Tate/ Tyson/ Lemon should be available at their #10 pick. Unless they actually think taking Tate/ Bain is better than Reese/ Tyson then this is not realistic. I believe they go Reese/ Tyson every time there.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:16 pm to Proximo
From Jordan Schulz on Twitter:
quote:
Some draft notes, per sources:
• The high trade-up team many are eyeing is the Saints at No. 8.
• The Browns have been open to moving down from No. 6. Everyone knows the Cardinals would love to get out of No. 3.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:17 pm to Proximo
quote:
team behind us might give them more
They would have to as cle would be moving down more than 2 spots...
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:17 pm to WicKed WayZ
If we are seriously considering trading up then we really should throw WR out the window. We aren't trading up for a WR or eyeing a WR if this is the case.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:18 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
They go Styles/ Bailey/ Reese at #5.
They haven’t been linked to any of those guys besides Styles.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:19 pm to Dantheman504
No shite captain obvious. I highly doubt it would be for any of the WRs. It would be for Bailey or Reese at 5 or 6.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:20 pm to TwoDatBait
quote:
They would have to as cle would be moving down more than 2 spots...
Might referencing the team might do the move, not that maybe give more capital
Obviously the capital will be more hence why Cleveland might take another team’s offer over ours
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:24 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
They haven’t been linked to any of those guys besides Styles.
Yeah they have. Bailey was the favorite before Styles shot up and Bailey was presumed gone by #5.
They aren't linked for the same reason we aren't linked to Mendoza/ Reese and no longer linked to Love....cause he's expected to be gone. Doesn't mean they pass on him if he's there.
Someone posted draft odds and have Caleb Downs at +950. Many probably think that's because we don't want him but its because he's likely gone.
Its odds we acquire them not odds of how much we like someone.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:24 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
No shite captain obvious. I highly doubt it would be for any of the WRs.
Wasn't targeted at you. The amount of people who think WR is in play is scary.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:28 pm to Dantheman504
WR is absolutely in play at 8. If we trade up I think it’s styles or love as the target
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:30 pm to Proximo
The melts on here if Reese is available at #4 and we trade up to draft Love. Lol
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:33 pm to Dantheman504
entertaining for sure but hopefully they aren’t that stupid. Cleveland at 6 is my limit. Above that I melt
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:35 pm to Proximo
quote:
entertaining for sure but hopefully they aren’t that stupid. Cleveland at 6 is my limit.
I just get a vibe that the Saints history is being used as leverage against the real serious teams willing to trade up. You cannot convince me that we want to trade up more than a team like the Cowboys who also have more enticing trade offers/ picks.
Even if we are "serious" about trading up we will easily get outbid. Just doesn't seem realistic this year.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:38 pm to WicKed WayZ
If Styles, Bailey, Love and Downs are off the board, I’m okay trading 8 and 73 for Reese at 6. It’s not what I prefer, but I’d be okay with it.
I’d also be okay staying put and getting Delane or Tate there too.
I’d also be okay staying put and getting Delane or Tate there too.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:00 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Hypothetical: if Arvell Reese makes it to the Browns at Pick 6
How does Reese fit the Saints defense?
Not trying to be sarcastic. What I know of Reese is he's a phenomenal athletes that had 2 years playing at Ohio St. and 1 year of high production. There seems to be legit question about whether his pass rushing ability will translate to the NFL but at he very least you're pretty damn good LBer with a lot of potential.
Not saying he will or should fall out of the top 10 but I don't see the fit in New Orleans necessarily. Bailey or Bain or even Styles(If LBer is what they're looking for) would make much more sense if the Saints look to go that direction.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:49 pm to WicKed WayZ
I think Love at 3 is a smoke screen… they’re trying to get someone to jump Tennessee so they can move down.
I still think Reese goes top 3.
But to answer your question, I’d be okay with a move down from round 3 to round 5 in order to move up from 8 to 6 if it meant getting Reese.
I still think Reese goes top 3.
But to answer your question, I’d be okay with a move down from round 3 to round 5 in order to move up from 8 to 6 if it meant getting Reese.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News