- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
His Heel Hit First. Why doesn't that count?
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:31 pm
You could clearly see the heel hit before the toe went out of bounds. Has the rule changed? Does it have to be the whole foot? Receivers can drag their toes and it be in. Why can't our heel hit first in bounds and then your toe go out of bounds?
That used to be allowed. What happened?
That used to be allowed. What happened?
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:31 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
That used to be allowed
Wrong
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:31 pm to AlaTiger
Some of you guys are fricking retards.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:31 pm to AlaTiger
Because both feet need to be in bounds and one of them was out of bounds, regardless of the heel being in bounds.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:32 pm to AlaTiger
Goodell got his extension.
Saints fricked.
Saints fricked.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:32 pm to AlaTiger
That was literally never allowed
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:33 pm to blackandgolddude
Why is a heel different than a toe?
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:34 pm to AlaTiger
I was wondering the same thing.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:34 pm to blackandgolddude
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:34 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
Why is a heel different than a toe?
If your toe hits in bounds then your heel goes out, it's incomplete too.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:35 pm to AlaTiger
It's not if the reciever is falling backwards and then he puts his heel down after his toes. They would called it out. It was the correct call. The forward toe drag is something that is part of the game. It might due to the fact that another body part hits out of bounds before the rest of the foot on drag plays.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:38 pm to TH03
I'm not sure that's true. Let's assume you only tap your second toe and the whole foot never comes down and you're shoved out. The rest of your foot actually does come down out of bounds doesn't it? It just does it further away from the out-of-bounds mark
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:40 pm to nola000
If he could hippie heel, it would be a TD per the rules.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:44 pm to nola000
quote:
I'm not sure that's true. Let's assume you only tap your second toe and the whole foot never comes down and you're shoved out.
So you got 2 feet down in bounds with no part of the foot out of bounds.
quote:
The rest of your foot actually does come down out of bounds doesn't it? It just does it further away from the out-of-bounds mark
That's a separate occurrence of the foot being down. That's like saying his foot is down out of bounds after he walks to the side line.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:56 pm to TH03
quote:
If your toe hits in bounds then your heel goes out, it's incomplete too.
This isnt true. Ive seen many receivers catch balls along sidelines while dragging their toe.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 2:59 pm to dj30
It is true. You can toe tap and go out but if your entire foot comes down and any part is touching out of bounds than it is not a catch
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News