- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gave up too much for a DE
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:30 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:30 pm to lsupride87
Some of you people are dumb as frick. It's NOT 2 1st rd picks they swapped picks with GB 15 & 27 next years 1st rd pick (probably at the very end of the 1st rd) and this year's 5th rd pick. In others words, we got who we wanted for practically nothing.
1
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:30 pm to Peazey
If my choice was to have the 27th pick this year, and two first round picks next year over Davenport and no first round picks next year, I would take the picks
That’s how people should look at it when saying who won the trade as of now
I am completely ok with people feeling differently
That’s how people should look at it when saying who won the trade as of now
I am completely ok with people feeling differently
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:31 pm to Lester Earl
I still think next year, we have as good a shot, if not better than this year. So I'd be happy with that.
Now if he doesnt pan out until 3 years from now, then it's a bust just as if he didnt work out at all imo. It'll be too late
Now if he doesnt pan out until 3 years from now, then it's a bust just as if he didnt work out at all imo. It'll be too late
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:32 pm to LesnarF5
quote:Dude, you just called people dumb as frick, then said giving up a 1st round and 5th round pick is basically nothing
Some of you people are dumb as frick. It's NOT 2 1st rd picks they swapped picks with GB 15 & 27 next years 1st rd pick (probably at the very end of the 1st rd) and this year's 5th rd pick. In others words, we got who we wanted for practically nothing.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:32 pm to sunnydaze
You make it sound as if a DE isn’t one of the most important positions in football
Other than QB, Dline always get taken early for a reason
Other than QB, Dline always get taken early for a reason
This post was edited on 4/26/18 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:32 pm to sunnydaze
Gave up way too much. For all we know this could be a top 10 pick. You never know with this squad
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:32 pm to lsupride87
How are we getting 2 firsts next year in this scenario
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:33 pm to Pendulum
You realize the team we traded with has two first round picks next year right?
They have their own, and now ours.....
They have their own, and now ours.....
This post was edited on 4/26/18 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:34 pm to lsupride87
Lol you are repeating back to me things i already said as your counter argument
You know how i know you lost?
You know how i know you lost?
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:34 pm to lsupride87
You would rather pick 3 players who the front office maybe doesn't think has a great chance to contribute than 1 player who the front office apparently think has star potential? That's just stupid.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:35 pm to lsupride87
Again, how are WE getting 2 1sts next year.
Are we comparing gbs situation which we could never have had, to ours? What the fk is the point of that?
Are we comparing gbs situation which we could never have had, to ours? What the fk is the point of that?
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:36 pm to lsupride87
I don't give 2 shits if GB has 10 1st rd pick next year. Not my concern, for moving up 13 spots and only giving up next years 1st and a 5th rd pick to me is nothing.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:37 pm to Peazey
quote:What?
You would rather pick 3 players who the front office maybe doesn't think has a great chance to contribute than 1 player who the front office apparently think has star potential? That's just stupid.
Team a has 2018 14th pick
Team b has 2018 27th pick, and two first round picks in 2019 and an additional 5th round pick
I like team bs scenario better
That is my only point. I think they “won the trade”, but as always, if Davenport is awesome nobody will care
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:37 pm to Pendulum
quote:Because I was speaking to the notion of “who won the trade”
Are we comparing gbs situation which we could never have had, to ours? What the fk is the point of that?
Christ on a cracker people are defensive
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:38 pm to LesnarF5
frick this board it makes you feel stupid just reading it. You people are just fricking miserable.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:39 pm to sunnydaze
We are Super Bowl contenders now.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:40 pm to LesnarF5
I still think you have the stupidest post in here, and you actually seem the angriest too
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:41 pm to LSUZombie
While you discount one first rounder, it didn't have to be spent on this de.
He cost 2 1s and a 5th rounder.
As you say, moving up from 27 cost one 1st rounder in 19 and the 5th rounder now.
He cost 2 1s and a 5th rounder.
As you say, moving up from 27 cost one 1st rounder in 19 and the 5th rounder now.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:44 pm to Lester Earl
So trading 2 picks for 4-6 sacks is a win?
If it's a "win now" move like some are saying then we need more than 4 sacks
If it's a "win now" move like some are saying then we need more than 4 sacks
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:45 pm to sunnydaze
Yes
4-6 sacks for a rookie who won’t be an every down players yet, that’s a win
4-6 sacks for a rookie who won’t be an every down players yet, that’s a win
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News