- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cooks is a bust
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:39 am to DatNolaClap
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:39 am to DatNolaClap
quote:
Dont even start with this shite again.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:42 am to DatNolaClap
quote:
Well i guess every NFL analyst, commentator, and coach is a fool, because i dont think anyone (maybe besides Sean Payton) would take Snead over Landry.
By that same logic, every analyst, commentator, and coach had Cooks as a better receiver than Landry in 2014.
Derp
quote:
injured and he runs around 4.5, but ignorance is a troll's bliss i guess.
He ran a 4.58 at the much more player friendly pro day.
He's in the 4.6 area. 4.5
This post was edited on 12/29/15 at 11:49 am
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:44 am to Melvin
I wish you all would realize that you cant evaluate a players talent strictly on his stats. You have to watch a player play to make an honest evaluation. If you evaluate players strictly on stats then the NFL would be filled with sub par talent. Kikaha should have been the number one pick in the draft, after all, he had 19 sacks his last season at washington. Yes, stats can be telling of a player's talent, but they can also be a product of the system he is in. Obviously not many of you realize that.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:47 am to DatNolaClap
I've watched both Cooks and Landry extensively and Cooks > Landry by the eye test.
See how that goes?
See how that goes?
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:47 am to DatNolaClap
quote:
If you evaluate players strictly on stats then the NFL would be filled with sub par talent. Kikaha should have been the number one pick in the draft, after all, he had 19 sacks his last season at washington.
First, that is college
Second, he's outplayed his draft spot, but one of the reasons be fell was concern for his knee
Third, why was Cooks drafted higher?
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:48 am to DatNolaClap
quote:
I wish you all would realize that you cant evaluate a players talent strictly on his stats. You have to watch a player play to make an honest evaluation. If you evaluate players strictly on stats then the NFL would be filled with sub par talent. Kikaha should have been the number one pick in the draft, after all, he had 19 sacks his last season at washington. Yes, stats can be telling of a player's talent, but they can also be a product of the system he is in. Obviously not many of you realize that.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:50 am to DatNolaClap
quote:
Yes, stats can be telling of a player's talent, but they can also be a product of the system he is in. Obviously not many of you realize that.
He's 7th on his own team in yards per catch. I guess other players are lucking into getting down field
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:51 am to CocoLoco
quote:
Wouldn't go that far.
Landry is a very good player. Like Snead a lot; he's a more physical Lance Moore, but I couldn't take him over Landry.
again, find me something that Landry does better than Snead.
Return kicks? i dont really care about that at all. Important players dont really do that.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:57 am to DatNolaClap
quote:
where is your comparison between drew Brees and Ryan Tannehill? Also note the dolphins have landry run 5 yard routes all the time.
I was just letting you know your point was wrong.
Your intelligence seems to be on the level of brandincookem. Are you another alter?
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:58 am to Lester Earl
You really are an idiot.... Or just a beautiful troll. The other players are designed to go down the field further because that is the system. A failed one at that.

Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:00 pm to DatNolaClap
quote:
The other players are designed to go down the field further because that is the system. A failed one at that
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:01 pm to DatNolaClap
quote:
The other players are designed to go down the field further because that is the system.
so why isnt Landry plugged into this role? the other WRs arent very good
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:05 pm to DatNolaClap
quote:
Yes, i would rather have Jarvis Landry in the second round. we should have traded up a few pics in the second to get him.
He was drafted after our second round pick...
You're on a roll for accuracy in this thread
This post was edited on 12/29/15 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:07 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
He was drafted after our second round pick...
that's just stats and numbers man. can't rely on that, use your eyes.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:10 pm to DatNolaClap
quote:
DatNolaClap
That was a serious question? Your train of thought seems to align with him. Did you grow up in the same household perhaps?
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:15 pm to Mystery
I think the other guy was banned as he has a post marked unreadable
Could be the same guy. Both struggle with English.
Could be the same guy. Both struggle with English.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:25 pm to TigerBait1127
If i were BrandinCookem's alter, dont you think there would be two upvotes on all of our posts? And i like how you try to comment on someones use of the English language when you just posted an incomplete sentence right before you say we struggle with english. Good Job though! 
This post was edited on 12/29/15 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:33 pm to DatNolaClap
quote:
If i were BrandinCookem's alter, dont you think there would be two upvotes on all of our posts?
not if BC is banned.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 12:52 pm to Chad504boy
What's going on in here? What's that smell?
Back to top



0



