- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:33 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Ken Crawley
?
Verified account
@RIPGADGETT
Follow Follow @RIPGADGETT
More
Honey Badger.
6:44 AM - 15 Mar 2018
Ken Crawley knows something we dont?
Suh is more than likely going to be a Seahag.
quote:
Jordan Schultz
?
Verified account
@Schultz_Report
Follow Follow @Schultz_Report
More
Ndamukong Suh tells me he had a great phone conversation with Pete Carroll last night and that there is tangible interest between both parties. The #Seahawks are very excited about Suh -- who has a host of potential suitors -- given how dominant and disruptive he is.
7:00 AM - 15 Mar 2018
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:36 am to 50_Tiger
Suh is a much bigger need than Honey Badger. I do not see the Saints even seriously pursuing HB at this point.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:37 am to Lester Earl
100% agree, I'm just pointing out that teams can make deals happen if they really want too.
I would prefer to never be in cap hell again.
I would prefer to never be in cap hell again.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:52 am to NOSHAU
Is he a need because you think we need a DT? Or do you think he would address pass rusher?
I don't see DT as a big need. However if you ask me if I would like a dominating player, I would say yes to any position on the team.
I guess what I am getting at is if we don't land Suh, it isn't like we screwed the pooch. He would be great to add to the team, but not at a "must be addressed" position.
I don't see DT as a big need. However if you ask me if I would like a dominating player, I would say yes to any position on the team.
I guess what I am getting at is if we don't land Suh, it isn't like we screwed the pooch. He would be great to add to the team, but not at a "must be addressed" position.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 12:02 pm to Ole Vidalia Tiger
quote:
Suh or Mathieu which one do you take?
Suh. Easily. We've already signed a FA safety and CB.
Popular
Back to top
