- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brees to Jimmy TD overturned
Posted on 12/12/11 at 4:00 pm to ray terese
Posted on 12/12/11 at 4:00 pm to ray terese
No matter homies Saints won.We have a damm strong football team.HAVE A NICE DAY!!!!!!!
0
Posted on 12/12/11 at 4:48 pm to SouljaBreauxTellEm
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 12/12/11 at 4:52 pm to SwampDonks
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:01 pm to Titleist72
Posted on 12/12/11 at 9:19 pm to myree
Posted on 12/12/11 at 9:23 pm to myree
they showed 2 replays in the stadium, both looked like sure TD
was there a replay on TV that showed otherwsie?
was there a replay on TV that showed otherwsie?
Posted on 12/13/11 at 8:36 am to Lester Earl
quote:
was there a replay on TV that showed otherwsie?
Before Graham's knee came down in bounds, when his foot tapped down near the sidelines, they zoomed in and showed clear as day a white blade of grass coming up when his cleat came down.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 8:39 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Before Graham's knee came down in bounds, when his foot tapped down near the sidelines, they zoomed in and showed clear as day a white blade of grass coming up when his cleat came down.
negative ghostrider.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 8:40 am to Lester Earl
quote:
they showed 2 replays in the stadium, both looked like sure TD
There was no doubt in my mind that I thought it was a catch/TD watching it from the big screen. Even the Titan fans behind us thought it was a TD.
guess not.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 8:40 am to whodatfan
quote:
negative ghostrider.
what part of my factual statement would you like to disagree with?
Posted on 12/13/11 at 8:53 am to Chad504boy
quote:
my factual statement
meh.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 8:55 am to Chad504boy
I heard that a toe counts as a foot but a heel doesn't. Probably why the didn't overturn but I think he was in.
Eta: if he taps the heel then goes out, is he in? Should be the same as a toe. I understand this instance was a bit different with the toe possibly going out before he stopped but I would think once the knee hit, he as down by contact.
Eta: if he taps the heel then goes out, is he in? Should be the same as a toe. I understand this instance was a bit different with the toe possibly going out before he stopped but I would think once the knee hit, he as down by contact.
This post was edited on 12/13/11 at 8:58 am
Posted on 12/13/11 at 8:55 am to whodatfan
quote:
meh.
If at the very least you can't argue against the ruling on the field stands as called.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 9:01 am to Chad504boy
I dont remember what the call on the field was?
Was it called a catch, but out of bounds?
Or was it called a no catch, and then during the review they saw he caught it but was out of bounds?
Was it called a catch, but out of bounds?
Or was it called a no catch, and then during the review they saw he caught it but was out of bounds?
Posted on 12/13/11 at 9:09 am to SaintEB
quote:
I heard that a toe counts as a foot but a heel doesn't. Probably why the didn't overturn but I think he was in.
Eta: if he taps the heel then goes out, is he in? Should be the same as a toe. I understand this instance was a bit different with the toe possibly going out before he stopped but I would think once the knee hit, he as down by contact.
Even if your toes come down in bounds, you must keep the rest of the foot from touching out of bounds if it comes down? So it doesn't matter if it's a heel or toe, the rest of the foot (IF IT COMES DOWN) can not come down out of bounds. Usually toe catches, the back of the foot stays off the ground. If jimmy's heel came down in bounds and managed to keep his toes off the ground same premise would have applied.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 9:13 am to Chad504boy
I don't get the shite either. We got jobbed, plain and simple.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 9:14 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:
I don't get the shite either. We got jobbed, plain and simple.
What don't you get about a cleat touching a white blade of grass and the ruling on the field was a no catch which made it that much more difficult to overturn?
Posted on 12/13/11 at 9:25 am to Chad504boy
quote:
What don't you get about a cleat touching a white blade of grass
I would understand it if the cleat touched out of bounds first, but the heel already made contact in bounds. I guess toe trumps all.
quote:
and the ruling on the field was a no catch which made it that much more difficult to overturn?
I get this.
Posted on 12/13/11 at 9:28 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:
I would understand it if the cleat touched out of bounds first, but the heel already made contact in bounds. I guess toe trumps all.
If one's toes came down in bounds but then their heels came down out of bounds in all the same downward motion, do you not understand this would be ruled an incomplete catch?
Posted on 12/13/11 at 9:28 am to Chad504boy
quote:
If at the very least you can't argue against the ruling on the field stands as called.
Your statement is fact because the call on the field stood? Ok.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News