re: Brandin Cooks vs. Jarvis Landry

Landry is the much better receiver and can actually make a catch in traffic. Much better hands as well. And we could have gotten him in the second and saved a draft pick. No question at this point

why dont you take yours off

The empirical evidence supports Cooks pretty strongly.

Not to mention that I believe Cooks had a lower drop rate as someone said in this thread (3.0% vs 1.6%, both damn good at catching the ball)

Crazy how Landry is better at all the things that can't be measured, and you call others homers

That's one of the better posts you've made.

Contains about the same amount of substance and thought as the majority of your posts

40: 4.77 vs 4.33* *=best in class
Bench: 12 vs 16
Vertical: 31.5 vs 36
Broad Jump: 9 ft vs 10
20 yard shuttle: 4.59 vs 3.81*
60 yard shuttle: N/A vs 10.72*
3 cone drill: 7.56 vs 6.76

REC: 110 vs 84
Yards: 1157 vs 1138
TDs: 4 vs 9 (8 coming in the last 9 games)
Drop Rate: 3 vs 1.6
Avg: 10.5 vs 13.5

Jarvis needs to keep his emotions in check during the games too. Had a few costly personal fouls (7 penalties for Jarvis, 3 personal fouls; Cooks had 1 penalty all year)

You'd think there'd be something that Jarvis would blow away Cooks at on the stat sheet with the way you're acting.

Cooks was very impressive this season, especially in the 2nd half of the season. They play different roles, but Cooks has a much higher ceiling, and he showed it down the stretch.

quote:

---

Dude has all those combine stats yet none of it shows up in the actual game.

---

Could have sworn those 8 touchdowns in the last 9 games put 6 up on the scoreboard

quote:

---

watching the game clearly shows Landry is a far superior football player. 90% of fans would say Jarvis is better with the who dats and cali being the last 10  

---

Cute, thanks for repeating my point about not being able to back up your "argument"

i only know of this one

yea dude, sure. keep telling yourself that