Started By
Message
locked post

Are there still people in the "the offense is better without Graham" camp?

Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:30 pm
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158761 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:30 pm
No? Didn't think so
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:31 pm to
They have all moved to the "offense is better without Sproles" camp
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

"the offense is better without Graham"


Say what now?

Who are these people. I want names.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278407 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:36 pm to
waitwut
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:36 pm to
who the hell said that?

lulz
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:38 pm to
a bunch of people.

"is it better jommy g is out"

"dew spreads it around more now"

"we are getting a chance to see the offense w/o grahm"

"maybe missing graam isnt such a bad thing"

Replace every one of those "graamses" with "sproleses" and those pople are still around.

They've just found another idiocy to sink their teeth into.
This post was edited on 11/11/12 at 10:39 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:39 pm to
The offense is better when Graham isn't being forced the ball. Colston and Moore were very involved and We wouldn't have won with the game plan from weeks 1-3.

Devery would've had a nice game as well if he hasn't dropped 2 huge passes, one that killed a drive

Never has anyone here suggested to my knowledge that the offense is Better without jimmy graham.
This post was edited on 11/11/12 at 10:41 pm
Posted by fightingtigers98
Member since Oct 2011
13239 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:42 pm to
i don't think they try to force graham the ball, but they do it with sproles we have ran the ball much more effectively without him. Hope he gets healthy soon
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:46 pm to
Interesting. Is there any doubt now that kromer and/or Carmichael are the biggest retards ever for leaving ivory inactive?

ETA: a huge part of having graham or sproles being forced the ball in weeks 1-3 was colston dropping everything
This post was edited on 11/11/12 at 10:48 pm
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15359 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:54 pm to
What? Colston dropping everything, okay. I don't remember him having a bunch of drops other than the pass two weeks.
This post was edited on 11/11/12 at 10:56 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 11:00 pm to
It was a problem in the KC game for sure
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

Are there still people in the "the offense is better without Graham" camp?


wait, wait wait... Daniel Graham you mean right?
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

. Is there any doubt now that kromer and/or Carmichael are the biggest retards ever for leaving ivory inactive?

Whos to say he would've run this hard if they didn't starve him on the bench before unleashing him. There's a reason you don't pamper a fighting dog. You beat it and starve it, and when the fight finally comes, it fricks shite up.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141958 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

Who are these people. I want names.

and Rex doesn't count
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 11:18 pm to
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 11/11/12 at 11:20 pm to
Easy, Vick
Posted by catcher88
Bayou Lafourche
Member since Oct 2012
95 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 6:37 am to
These people deserve a straight shot to the dick


Posted by Sorrento Muddbugs
Member since Sep 2011
1794 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Whos to say he would've run this hard if they didn't starve him on the bench before unleashing him. There's a reason you don't pamper a fighting dog. You beat it and starve it, and when the fight finally comes, it fricks shite up.


Funny, but Ivory has been running hard since he showed up in the 2010 pre-season.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 7:18 am to
That's like the people now asking "Is the offense better without Sproles????"
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 7:26 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram