- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on this trade..?
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:17 am to LosLobos111
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:17 am to LosLobos111
quote:
Bucks were incredibly deep
True, but Kawhi manhandled Giannis in that series.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:23 am to Not Cooper
Kawhi killed everyone tbf
Yeah Giannis as good as his just wasn't ready and just got Veteran'd
Will be much more experienced next year and I have them as my favorite
Yeah Giannis as good as his just wasn't ready and just got Veteran'd
Will be much more experienced next year and I have them as my favorite
This post was edited on 6/20/19 at 10:24 am
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:42 am to dtowntiger33
quote:
Maybe go with Solo and 4 for Cov Saric and 11?
I'm warming up to this.
If the deal is on the table and Goga is still on the board at 11 (likely), I think I'm good with it.
Take Garland at 4 and see where the pieces fall, knowing this deal is an option.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:45 am to CP3forMVP
quote:
I said it last night but you're potentially forfeiting prospects like Garland and Culver that could develop into 10-20 EWA type players for Robert Covington and what? Nassir Little? PJ Washington?
Goga Goga Goga Goga Goga Goga
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:53 am to SoFresh
quote:
If the deal is on the table and Goga is still on the board at 11 (likely), I think I'm good with it.
What if Goga is still there at 14?
I'd rather the Boston trade if we are getting the Memphis pick with Hayward and 14.
I'd only want the minny trade if Hayes is at 11.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:55 am to CP3forMVP
quote:FWIW, I mentioned that I'd be willing to take the risk on the #4 pick probably more than obtaining RoCo, but I'm not sure why you can't make any sense of it.
I said it last night but you're potentially forfeiting prospects like Garland and Culver that could develop into 10-20 EWA type players for Robert Covington and what? Nassir Little? PJ Washington?
I just can't make any sense of it.
The #4 overall pick is more likely to become a below average player than even an above average player, much less an All Star. It certainly makes sense to take RoCo and get a proven player now to avoid potentially picking a guy who gives us nothing.
For exampe, since 2010 the 7/9/10 picks have had more Win Shares added than the #4 overall pick.
If Griff thinks a guy is just head and shoulders way above guys a few picks below, he should make the pick. Otherwise, we should probably trade down if we can add a RoCo and most certainly if we could add a Myles Turner.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:01 am to CP3forMVP
I’m with you on this.
As nice as the Lakers haul is in theory, and with the volatility of the new smoothing of the draft, there is a real chance that we don’t pick as high as 4 in the Zion era.
Like with Demps, I don’t like the logic of giving away those rare guaranteed high picks to acquire those category of guys(the Robert Covington, Tyreke Evans, George Hill, older Marc Gasol role players) you can get at any point of your time schedule for mid to late first rounders.
Garland might not be the next Steph Curry, but chances are based on historical precedence, even if he disappoints you can still probably package him with minimum filler to get a mid tier veteran from a rebuilding team two years from now.
As nice as the Lakers haul is in theory, and with the volatility of the new smoothing of the draft, there is a real chance that we don’t pick as high as 4 in the Zion era.
Like with Demps, I don’t like the logic of giving away those rare guaranteed high picks to acquire those category of guys(the Robert Covington, Tyreke Evans, George Hill, older Marc Gasol role players) you can get at any point of your time schedule for mid to late first rounders.
Garland might not be the next Steph Curry, but chances are based on historical precedence, even if he disappoints you can still probably package him with minimum filler to get a mid tier veteran from a rebuilding team two years from now.
This post was edited on 6/20/19 at 11:03 am
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:10 am to Geaux_Tigers_08
Covington is a good fit, but #11 is a spot or two too far, in this draft, to drop down... #10 is the floor, IMO
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:13 am to Bronc
quote:
Garland might not be the next Steph Curry, but chances are based on historical precedence, even if he disappoints you can still probably package him with minimum filler to get a mid tier veteran from a rebuilding team two years from now.
Josh Jackson isn't getting you anything right now. They can't give him away.
Dragan Bender isn't netting you anything.
Porzingis netted a lot.
Aaron Gordon might net you something decent after year 2, more now b/c he didn't make a nice jump until year 4.
Zeller, Waiters and Tristan Thompson weren't netting you anything special after year 2, or anything special later on, except maybe Waiters when he had a good year in OKC and got his next contract in Miami, which isn't really working out for them.
Wesley Johnson wasn't getting you anything.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:14 am to Bronc
I like RoCo, but he is not a guy who is going to carry an offensive load. He is a complementary player on offense and solid defender. Personally, that is not enough to drop all the way from 4 to 11. I assume maybe we would make them take Hill or have them include Okogie.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:38 am to TeddyPadillac
quote:
I'd rather the Boston trade if we are getting the Memphis pick with Hayward and 14.
Hayward has 1 year left (technically 1+1, but semantics) on his massive deal. I guess you'd swap Solo and Moore for him and you would be better this coming season but I don't see much value in that. I think GH will be much better than he was last season, but I'd rather RoCo who is on a nice contract (3/36 remaining) and is a great fit.
With my basic understanding of the cap, dealing Solo & 4 for 11 & RoCo will create ~$4MM more projected cap space for the Pels. Or if you get them to throw in Okogie too, you still have created an additional $1.5MM in cap space. A GH trade involving Solo & Moore would reduce your cap space by ~$8MM.
I also don't see as much value in the Memphis pick as everyone else seems to have. We've seen how much harder teams try in seasons where they don't have a first rounder in the subsequent draft (ex: 2012 Twolves, 2019 Kings). I know the lottery odds are more flat than ever before, but I feel it will most likely end up being a lot worse pick than many people feel.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:43 am to SoFresh
quote:
Hayward has 1 year left (technically 1+1, but semantics) on his massive deal.
The last year is a player option so it's hardly semantics.
He's not opting out of 33 million so it's more like 2 years
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:46 am to SoFresh
quote:
Hayward has 1 year left (technically 1+1, but semantics) on his massive deal.
he's not opting out of it.
quote:
I think GH will be much better than he was last season, but I'd rather RoCo who is on a nice contract (3/36 remaining) and is a great fit.
I agree completely. But i'd rather 14/20/Memphis pick over the #11 much more so than simply RoCo being a better fit than Hayward.
quote:
With my basic understanding of the cap, dealing Solo & 4 for 11 & RoCo will create ~$4MM more projected cap space for the Pels. Or if you get them to throw in Okogie too, you still have created an additional $1.5MM in cap space. A GH trade involving Solo & Moore would reduce your cap space by ~$8MM.
All good points, but i think we are pretty set and whatever we do in FA, it's just role players. There's one starting spot up for grabs, the 5 spot. You can get a decent 5 for $10M/yr or less.
quote:
I also don't see as much value in the Memphis pick as everyone else seems to have. We've seen how much harder teams try in seasons where they don't have a first rounder in the subsequent draft (ex: 2012 Twolves, 2019 Kings). I know the lottery odds are more flat than ever before, but I feel it will most likely end up being a lot worse pick than many people feel.
I do'nt disagree that the Memphis pick may end up being around 10 rather than 2, but what if we are 16 and we have 10 too, maybe we can move up in the draft like ATL is trying to do, or trade them. It's a very good asset to have, even if it ends up being a higher than expected pick.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 11:50 am to TeddyPadillac
2020 draft will also be stronger
This post was edited on 6/20/19 at 11:51 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News