- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lakers Offseason Thread - Kyrie recruiting Lebron to DAL
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:52 am to longhorn22
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:52 am to longhorn22
quote:
Correct. There are fans that cannot get past certain things that will continuously bring down a organization and keep a small org from growing to their full potential.

Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:53 am to NOSHAU
1. Not trolling
2. I am against talking Lakers on this board, yet the obsession is now being in a way that people are pushing even harder to discuss the Lakers?
3. I am legit
that this is even a thing in May.
2. I am against talking Lakers on this board, yet the obsession is now being in a way that people are pushing even harder to discuss the Lakers?
3. I am legit
Posted on 5/30/23 at 11:01 am to longhorn22
Longhorn isn't trolling guys, he's legitimately stupid.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 11:05 am to whatiknowsofar
I'm stupid for not wanting a team that isn't the Pels being the main engine of a Pels board. Makes sense.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 11:11 am to longhorn22
Main engine? It's one fricking thread. Calm your tits.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 11:34 am to longhorn22
quote:
et the obsession is now being in a way that people are pushing even harder to discuss the Lakers?
For Pelicans fans, ie not you.
I do not wish to discuss the Lakers at all, though.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 1:35 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Here are what picks the Pelicans have in this upcoming draft (2023 draft).
-a 2023 first-round pick swap with the Los Angeles Lakers (Pels take the higher pick)
-Pels 2023 second-round pick (if it finishes in the top-45 – if it doesn’t, it goes to the Atlanta Hawks)
-the Golden State Warriors’ 2023 second-round pick
-the Charlotte Hornets’ 2023 second-round pick
Here are what picks the Pels have in next year’s draft (2024 draft).
-the Los Angeles Lakers’ 2024 first-round pick (with an option to pick their 2025 first instead)
-a 2024 first-round pick swap with the Milwaukee Bucks (Pels take the higher pick)
-the Charlotte Hornets’ 2024 second-round pick
-a 2024 second-round pick swap with the Chicago Bulls (Pels take the lower pick)
Here are what picks the Pels have in the draft the year after that (2025 draft).
-the Los Angeles Lakers’ 2025 first-round pick (if we decide not to take their 2024 pick)
-the Milwaukee Bucks’ 2025 first-round pick
For those keeping score at home, that is four first-round picks and (potentially) five second-round picks in the next three drafts.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 1:37 pm to longhorn22
The Lakers 2024 with right to defer is probably more valuable than all of the other picks combined.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 2:39 pm to shel311
People have had over four days to vote, and the vote is 19-17 in favor.
Thus, we will have a Lakers Offseason Thread.
We had a big thread two years ago, and we ended up getting the #8 pick from the Lakers. We had a big thread last year, and we ended up not getting the swap from the Lakers.
So, if you are superstitious, then I would say that the results are ambiguous. I'm not, but I would say to those of you who are concerned that our thread cost us the pick swap:
"Did you consider that may the problem might not have been that we had a thread, but rather that we didn't go hard enough?"
Thus, we will have a Lakers Offseason Thread.
We had a big thread two years ago, and we ended up getting the #8 pick from the Lakers. We had a big thread last year, and we ended up not getting the swap from the Lakers.
So, if you are superstitious, then I would say that the results are ambiguous. I'm not, but I would say to those of you who are concerned that our thread cost us the pick swap:
"Did you consider that may the problem might not have been that we had a thread, but rather that we didn't go hard enough?"
Posted on 5/30/23 at 2:41 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:Sounds like we're due!!
So, if you are superstitious, then I would say that the results are ambiguous.
quote:It's obviously this. It's just science!
"Did you consider that may the problem might not have been that we had a thread, but rather that we didn't go hard enough?"
Posted on 5/30/23 at 2:43 pm to GOP_Tiger
All this just for us to defer the pick in 2025 lol
Posted on 5/30/23 at 2:50 pm to Macintosh
quote:
All this just for us to defer the pick in 2025 lol
That's the thing: this year's thread can't actually cost us anything. If the thread doesn't "work," and we don't get a high pick from the Lakers, then we simply defer the pick.
Let's give the Juju one more year. If it doesn't work this year, then I promise not to make any more Lakers threads.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 2:53 pm to shel311
quote:
Sounds like we're due!!
Inescapable logic.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 3:04 pm to Macintosh
quote:So 2025 is our year then!
All this just for us to defer the pick in 2025 lol
Posted on 5/30/23 at 3:08 pm to GOP_Tiger
jay-z lyric... this was posted Friday or Saturday?
Posted on 5/30/23 at 3:09 pm to shel311
whats your take on moving assets rather than sit on them.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 3:14 pm to longhorn22
quote:If it were fake money or my money and I was a billionaire, I'd be all in on moving assets for more pieces, improving the team right now.
whats your take on moving assets rather than sit on them.
But knowing we aren't a tax team, have never been a tax team, and may only have 1 shot at slightly going into the tax at the most, I think we're a lot more restricted in terms of moves we can make than most think we are.
With Herb's extension coming up, I just don't really see how it's doable. I'm starting to think that we just keep Jval and let him play out the last season. I also don't think that is a doomsday scenario like many think. I just don't know how we move Jval for another $15mil ish longer term contract AND give Herb his money starting next season, I just don't see how we do that with the tax ramifications.
I'm moving closer to thinking we make zero significant moves, and honestly, that's not really a bad thing IMO.
This post was edited on 5/30/23 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 5/30/23 at 3:32 pm to shel311
quote:
I'm moving closer to thinking we may zero significant moves, and honestly, that's not really a bad thing IMO.
agree with this.
so much youth... would have loved for the Pels to make the playoffs in order to get real experience in the playoffs....but a start to finish year of playing together with how its constructed can definitely fall in the 48-58 win area which I think everyone will say is successful.
Make 1 move possibly that could put them over the hump come playoff time mid season...
Posted on 5/30/23 at 4:08 pm to longhorn22
quote:Yea, that's 1 caveat I should have added.
Make 1 move possibly that could put them over the hump come playoff time mid season...
If we're actually successful and a top 3 seed or some shite and healthy(lol) at the deadline, then if we only get 1 shot to go into the tax, then f'ing go for it right then and there.
Popular
Back to top



0




