re: I heard from a little bird

quote:

---

No there is no point that cardinals didn't happen in new orleans. it's a highly associated name with a highly associated religion of a city. Thats not a fricking point that 100% negates a naming concept/idea.

---

And I offered 10 different names that do the exact same thing. Pelicans, in my opinion, is terrible, but it may happen. Cardinals is both terrible and will not happen for several reasons that you choose to ignore.

quote:

---

And it's also 100% documented that Tom Benson doesn't hold any value to Jester's since he already owns the Pelicans and already views that as a worth while rebranding idea with marketing and money making potential.

---

Wow, you can repeat what I say with a douchebag tint. You clearly win the internet.

quote:

---

Wow, you can repeat what I say with a douchebag tint. You clearly win the internet.

---

I'm here just to explain the proof in the puddin of why you're opinions on the rebranding concepts from our current owner's perspective are pretty worthless.

quote:

---

I'm here just to explain the proof in the puddin of why you're opinions on the rebranding concepts from our current owner's perspective are pretty worthless.

---

You didn't prove shite, dumbass. You said something. That is it. Hell, Tom Benson may have told them to get the frick out of his office when they brought up Pelicans. If not, prove it. You can't, though, because you don't know shite.

Also, I'd be willing to bet there is someone in the organization checking message boards and blogs as a litmus test for the possible names.

quote:

---

You didn't prove shite, dumbass. You said something. That is it. Hell, Tom Benson may have told them to get the frick out of his office when they brought up Pelicans. If not, prove it. You can't, though, because you don't know shite.

---

You said nobody would be pelican merchandise.

The mere fact that Benson owns the Pelican naming rights proves that he sees value in that brand, something you don't. If simple logic doesn't work for you, i'm going to have to try to find an alternative method of explanations for you.

quote:

---

You said nobody would be pelican merchandise.

---

I most certainly did not

quote:

---

The mere fact that Benson owns the Pelican naming rights proves that he sees value in that brand,

---

Someone also owns Spirits and Angels. It's like scooping up web domains, fool.

quote:

---

If simple logic doesn't work for you, i'm going to have to try to find an alternative method of explanations for you.

---

Nah, stick to simple. It works for you.

quote:

---

That's my point 42.

---

Never said it was offensive. Maybe someone else did.

Saints is generic enough to sidestep specific religious issues.

It's like the badarse version of the "people who generally behave well."

To be clear Benson bought the brand long ago (90's?) and is maintaining LLC's tied to them.

This has a much larger value in terms of cost avoidance then just filing something with the SoS.

quote:

---

Which explains succinctly how little relevance a Cardinal has in New Orleans.

---

Somebody forgot to tell mr. benson when he named his professional team that all saints day wasn't' just celebrated in New orleans that it was celebrated all over and how little succinctly relevant it truly was to our city that he should have just named New Orleans the Vice Presidents or maybe the New Orleans Heismans Or the New Orleans Canadian Yucks. Some Heismans have been to New Orleans.