Started By
Message

re: How does Hawkins early development affect Dyson minutes when everyone is healthy?

Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:12 am to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62437 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:12 am to
quote:

I guess my question is isn’t a bit worrisome that a guy we drafted in the lottery and hopefully if everything works out perfectly maxes out as Josh Hart?? I love Josh Hart but if thats what people think Dyson will max out into, I’m not really sure how much time we should give to developing him.


I don't think that's his max, I think that's his floor and where he's going to end up when he's more seasoned in a few years. I also think Josh Hart is overrated on both offense and defense by this fanbase, so I want Dyson to be like Josh Hart with All NBA level defense. I think his ceiling is what Lonzo could have been.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
17379 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Dyson was great against SGA but again when healthy this team has more playable defensive wings than shooters.


We only have one other wing defender that's as good and switchable as Dyson. Dyson can shut down a quick PG even held his own and forced a miss on a post-up by Holmgren last night. You're really understating how good he is on defense. I'd take another Bruce Bowen type if we're trying to get stops in the playoffs.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
17379 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:

We’re top 5 in defensive rating and the second worst in offensive rating. Our defense is fine. We have a horrible offense.



We're 3-1 with the 1 being a night when Curry had a Steph night and the refs were horrible.

Meanwhile, you're dwelling on limitations of a player who was absolutely instrumental in us winning last night.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:23 am to
I would love for Dyson to be Bruce Brown. Hes also in his sixth year on his fourth team. Again I think Dyson in time will be good player just not sure it’ll be with the pelicans.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
17379 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:24 am to
quote:

I would love for Dyson to be Bruce Brown.


Bruce Bowen, not Bruce Brown.
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1872 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:26 am to
I don’t think Hawkins play affects Dyson’s minutes that much because they play different positions. Dyson is playing 64% of his minutes at the point. If Jose is effective when he comes back and/or we start to actually use Point Zion, then Dyson’s minutes may start to dwindle.

Also, I know Dyson’s offensive numbers have been abysmal, but he still leads the team in stocks/per 100, is third in DRtg, doesn’t foul that often despite drawing tough matchups, doesn’t turn the ball over, and does all this being 20 years old. He’s still the youngest player on the team by almost a full year and younger than a lot of the top picks in last years draft.

Considering that we are asking him to play backup point and guard guys like SGA in crunch time, I’d say he’s doing a pretty good job. We obviously need him to start shooting better, but if he can get you into your sets and protect the ball, he can bring value to the offense beyond just scoring.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:29 am to
The spurs were the fifth team he was on after he entered the league and became a decent impact rotational player in the playoffs.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62437 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:39 am to
quote:

The spurs were the fifth team he was on after he entered the league and became a decent impact rotational player in the playoffs.


If your point is we can pick up a journeyman version of Dyson cheaper, I strongly disagree and I submit most of the Demps era where he tried to find a 3 & D wing almost every year outside of the short lived Ariza era as exhibit A.

Dyson isn't just your average 3&D Wing. He's showing All NBA level defense and 1-5 switchability at age 20. Herb being Herb as a 24 year old rookie was surprising enough. Dyson being Dyson at 19-20 makes him a defensive prodigy that is only going to get better.
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2146 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:40 am to
quote:

What I don't get about the people dismissing Dyson is the idea that he needs to be Good or better on offense. He needs to hit open 3s about mid 30%, and develop his floater so when he goes to the lane he has a move besides passing.


I think the Pels have a much higher opinion on Dyson than most folks around here. VERY solid "floor", based on his defense & they expect his offense to eventually come around to being somewhere close to "average". Much higher ceiling than the limited overall game of Hawkins.

Sit tight...& check back in a year or so...Dyson will be a MUCH improved player. We're all gonna really like this guy...eventually.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:46 am to
“Much higher ceiling than the limited overall game of Hawkins.”

- I was a person who was down on Hawkins and I will say right now this is pretty inaccurate. He impacted this game in so many ways despite shooting poorly. Solid defense, passing and rebounding. High offense IQ. I can understand defending Dysons potential but to knock Hawkins to prove your point is just silly especially with what hes shown the last couple of games.
Posted by mhasen1
Texas
Member since Feb 2008
1852 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:50 am to
quote:

do we need to find minutes for a guy to eventually become josh hart?


Find minutes?

Naji Marshall averaged 23 minutes last year in 77 games. Josh Richardson averaged another 23 after coming to the Pelicans. Kira Lewis is averaging over 10 minutes per game this year.

Adding in CJ's age, Trey's injury, Jose's uncertain recovery, and the history of Ingram, Zion, and Nance, the last thing the Pelicans will need to do is find minutes for Dyson.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62437 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:51 am to
Yeah, I'm very pro Dyson, but I think Hawkins has a high ceiling. If he reaches his ceiling, we have our eventual CJ replacement.

Remember, we all thought Trey was going to just be a shooter at first. Now people are hoping he's the guy that lets us trade BI. They craziest part of that is that's not completely crazy.
This post was edited on 11/2/23 at 9:53 am
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:52 am to
I mean I get what you’re saying with 3&D wing. But you actually have to hit the 3 consistently to become a 3&D wing. As far being a defensive prodigy- I think his defense is solid to good but its not Herb elite- it may get there, may not who knows. And not every player because they’re young gets better with age especially with Pels- Kira, Jaxson and Naw.

That being said I think Dyson is a solid player in this league, I just think when our team is fully healthy and he continues to have offensive limitations I can easily see Hawkins eating into his minutes.
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2146 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:55 am to
quote:

I can understand defending Dysons potential but to knock Hawkins to prove your point is just silly especially with what hes shown the last couple of games


JMO...Hawkins has one above-average trait. Shooting. To be honest, at the moment...I consider Trey to be in that same boat. A shooter. Difference is...Trey is 6'10" (or whatever) & I fully expect him to develope into a much more well-rounded player, on both ends of the court. Hope I'm wrong about Hawkins...we'll see.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 9:58 am to
I mean has Hawkins not shown you that in the last couple of games? If anything the last couple of games has shown me how well rounded he is and shown me has potential to be more than just a shooter. I think Trey is definitely more than a shooter especially the way he attacks the rim and gets blocks.
Posted by higgsBoson
Democratic Party
Member since Jan 2012
1499 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 10:30 am to
quote:

But do we need to find minutes for a guy to eventually become josh hart? I guess to me its the question of spending time developing a guy on a roster you may not really need as much.



Exactly. Would we want to pay Hart his 4/80 on this team? I can’t imagine that for a guy whose skill set doesn’t fit on this team. So then Dyson has no future on this team unless he’s worse than that to warrant a really cheap deal.
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
7878 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 10:30 am to
quote:

I love Dyson’s D but he suffers from Lonzo syndrome and hates attacking the basket and finishing at the rim.


Interesting, because I see it different. He's been significantly more active offensively this year (albeit through four games) and has made several strong moves to the basket. Undoubtedly the perimeter shooting and foul shooting have been abysmal, which clearly is a problem. But I have seen definite growth in his offensive game this year over last year. Lets at least wait 20 or 25 games before writing him off completely offensively.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram