- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gameday Thread: Pelicans vs Rockets 7:00PM
Posted on 10/15/25 at 9:29 am to Dantheman504
Posted on 10/15/25 at 9:29 am to Dantheman504
Per spotrac, Pels are only 4.2m below the tax. Do you have some examples of players you would sign or trade for with the Hawkins, Jose contracts outgoing?
Posted on 10/15/25 at 9:33 am to Dantheman504
Zion
Trey
Poole
Murray
Herb
Bey
Missi
Looney
Fears
Queen
Peavy
Karlo
Jose
Hawk
This is a pretty fair breakdown of current assets and rank going forward. If we can just take Jose/ Hawk and add another player with value between Bey-Looney range then we are set IMO.
Trey
Poole
Murray
Herb
Bey
Missi
Looney
Fears
Queen
Peavy
Karlo
Jose
Hawk
This is a pretty fair breakdown of current assets and rank going forward. If we can just take Jose/ Hawk and add another player with value between Bey-Looney range then we are set IMO.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 9:41 am to DLBalla
quote:
Per spotrac, Pels are only 4.2m
I thought it was a little over $6. So even at 4.2+ Hawk would be $8.9mil and with Jose include $14.4mil.
quote:
Do you have some examples of players you would sign or trade for with the Hawkins, Jose contracts outgoing?
I want Sam Houser and we can make that happen. Malik Beasley would be nice if he's cleared and wants to come here. Westbrook is available.
Sam Houser/ Anthony Black/ Jaimie Jaquez/ Kelly Oubre Jr/ Dean Wade/ Ron Holland
Some of those guys might not be available but those would be great moves.
I mean even with the $9mil from Hawk/ Tax we should be able to add a player possibly even better than Jose to make Jose our #14. If we keep Jose then I want our roster to be good enough to only use him for emergencies and blow outs. And that wouldn't be a bad thing. We don't want to hope our roster is worse so that Jose is needed for 20 minutes a game.
This post was edited on 10/15/25 at 9:58 am
Posted on 10/15/25 at 11:04 am to Dantheman504
I think you are underrating Jose and greatly overrating Peavy. Jose has been a net positive player from day 1 and has had real interest from playoff teams (Milwaukee just last year). Peavy is an unproven mid second round pick. I would say he has no value other than being a throw in to a deal. If last night is any indication, he will not be in the rotation to begin the season. Hawkins is terrible and should not be in the NBA. He has no value other than his contract.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 11:18 am to ThePistol
quote:
think you are underrating Jose and greatly overrating Peavy. Jose has been a net positive player from day 1 and has had real interest from playoff teams (Milwaukee just last year). Peavy is an unproven mid second round pick.
The fact that they are right next to each other in the depth chart rankings and 1 hasn't played a real nba game should tell you I am not underrating Jose even if you want to put Jose slightly above Peavy.
Jose can only do so much at PG/ SG and can still be a liability times. He's also not amazing on nights he isn't efficient in a SG role. Jose is an undersized PG that we don't need and that we ideally need to play SG. So no, I'm not undervaluing him and its just not the fit. If Peavy can come off the bench and guard high level SF's then he's already a more important player than Jose.
Only Pels fans would say I'm "undervaluing" a player who is outside of the top 10 rotation, capped being undersized, and capped at potential being 27 years old. He is a 27y/o sub 35% 3pt shooter who is praised for his defense that isn't even amazing because he can only do so much at 6' and still gets bullied in situations. It also took him averaging 24.4min a game to finally break 10pts and he really shouldn't be playing over 20.
I'm not undervaluing a guy who will rarely break 10pts on a season at 27 y/o who isn't an ideal PG or SG fit. Y'all just don't want to accept it.
This post was edited on 10/15/25 at 11:20 am
Posted on 10/15/25 at 2:42 pm to Dantheman504
quote:that’s way too many Jose minutes. 15 is plenty and you can leave him in for stretches longer if he’s shooting well
It also took him averaging 24.4min a game to finally break 10pts and he really shouldn't be playing over 20.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 5:16 pm to cgrand
Watched replay. Fears really stood out to me. He was…at ease it looked. I’m no nba guru but that stood out to me for a rook. Reading the board am I wrong on him? He looked good I thought with a more mature presence than many of our rookies of the past.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 8:43 pm to goatmilker
Some of the OU fans still follow him so thought I’d post one with his highlights in case anyone missed game and wants to see some of his play.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/15/25 at 8:54 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Reading the board am I wrong on him? He looked good I thought with a more mature presence than many of our rookies of the past.
No. He has looked good and ready to play sooner than most of us thought. I've been willing to give him and Queen a bit of a pass for this season. But it would be awesome if either one, of both, are in our top 10.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 9:21 pm to goatmilker
quote:He was very good late in the game. Against the first and second line guys, he looked like a rookie, but showed a lot of poise late in the game.
Watched replay. Fears really stood out to me. He was…at ease it looked. I’m no nba guru but that stood out to me for a rook. Reading the board am I wrong on him? He looked good I thought with a more mature presence than many of our rookies of the past.
Popular
Back to top

1





