- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For all who want to trade BI for Bridges
Posted on 2/6/24 at 11:11 am to JackVincennes
Posted on 2/6/24 at 11:11 am to JackVincennes
quote:Pretty crazy stat I learned.
There is no way the Nets trade Bridges for BI right?!
Last night BI had his 7th 40 point game of his career.
Mikal Bridges has 6 40 point games in the last year, less than a year to be exactly.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:30 pm to shel311
quote:
Mikal Bridges has 6 40 point games in the last year, less than a year to be exactly.
Comparing their stats, it looks like he's just streakier than BI, because he has more 40 point games but less points per game while taking more shots per game. BI also gives you almost 3 more assists per game (5.7 to 3.0) but very similar turnovers (2.4 to 2.3).
Oh, and BI also does a lot more switching defensively. Bridges pretty much never defends 4s or 5s, whereas BI switches onto bigs regular.
Basically, y'all a bunch of damn fools acting like Bridges is a simple upgrade from BI.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:35 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
Oh, and BI also has better defensive metrics than Bridges:
DBPM: -0.7 to -1.1
What about VORP? 1.5 to 0.8
Win shares per 48? .128 to .077
By pretty much all metrics, Brandon Ingram is a better player than Mikal Bridges.
DBPM: -0.7 to -1.1
What about VORP? 1.5 to 0.8
Win shares per 48? .128 to .077
By pretty much all metrics, Brandon Ingram is a better player than Mikal Bridges.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:35 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:Better defensively by a wide margin. Basically equal offensively. Not as good of a passer, but can score more and more efficiently than BI.
Basically, y'all a bunch of damn fools acting like Bridges is a simple upgrade from BI.
MIka's 1st 27 games as the #1 option he put up 26ppg on 60+% TS%, something BI has never done over any 27 game span of his career. ..again, Bridges did that in the 1st 27 games as a main dude on a team.
And again, defense is the difference between a guy you hope is average on defense and a guy who can be a legit DPOY candidate if in a role that doesn't require him to be a #1 on a team.
It's an upgrade.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:37 pm to shel311
Not to mention availability. Dude is an ironman.
BI misses games when Naji love taps him.
BI misses games when Naji love taps him.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:37 pm to shel311
quote:.
Better defensively by a wide margin.
Based on what? Because advanced states say BI is better defensively by a significant margin.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:38 pm to ghost2most
quote:
Not to mention availability
This, offensive rebounding, and shot value are pretty much the only things in his favor.
And even with him taking "better shots," Ingram is still a much more efficient offensive player across the board.
This post was edited on 2/6/24 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:39 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:GOP Tiger was soooooo spot on.
Based on what?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:40 pm to shel311
quote:
GOP Tiger was soooooo spot on.
You are sooooo much like my teenage daughter.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:41 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
You have to factor in other things like him knowing his role. I don't think he's demanding the ball at the end of games and would be fine spotting up for a kick out from Zion.
And I don't give a frick what any advance stats say this year. The entire NBA knows Bridges is a much better defender. I haven't watched him this year. Maybe he's having a down year defensively. But I'll give a dude who has made several All Defense teams over BI on that end.
And I don't give a frick what any advance stats say this year. The entire NBA knows Bridges is a much better defender. I haven't watched him this year. Maybe he's having a down year defensively. But I'll give a dude who has made several All Defense teams over BI on that end.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:42 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Based on what? Because advanced states say BI is better defensively by a significant margin.
Has BI ever come close to this?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:43 pm to shel311
quote:
shel311
quote:
Number of Posts: 108519
WILL SOMEONE PLEASE GET THIS MAN SOME HELP! HE WON'T STOP!
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:44 pm to ghost2most
Let's say Bridges is a 9 defensively and BI a 5.
Then I'd say Ingram is a 8 offensively and Bridges a 7.
Factor in availability, role and salary, and it's not close who I prefer.
Then I'd say Ingram is a 8 offensively and Bridges a 7.
Factor in availability, role and salary, and it's not close who I prefer.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:44 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:Aren't you the dude who was acting like you had to teach people about Murray the other day, then when you got proven to not know what you were talking about, you got real upset?
You are sooooo much like my teenage daughter.
Yep, that's you. But tell me more about how I won't recover from a post of yours when i'm cool as can be but you keep flipping out when someone proves you wrong...
Pels Talk is a cesspool nowadays, congrats, you're not helping with that.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:45 pm to 50_Tiger
quote:You're never going to recover from his reply to you!!
Has BI ever come close to this?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:45 pm to saintslsupels
quote:
saintslsupels
quote:
Not a stalker
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:46 pm to ghost2most
quote:It's clear as day an upgrade.
Let's say Bridges is a 9 defensively and BI a 5.
Then I'd say Ingram is a 8 offensively and Bridges a 7.
Factor in availability, role and salary, and it's not close who I prefer.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:47 pm to ghost2most
quote:
Let's say Bridges is a 9 defensively and BI a 5.
Then I'd say Ingram is a 8 offensively and Bridges a 7.
You can't just make shite up. You're not building a player on NBA2k. I have actual, documented stats and metrics that objectively show that BI has been better than Bridges defensively and significantly better offensively.
You can argue availability, but the saying Bridges is better defensively is demonstrably false.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:47 pm to shel311
quote:
shel311
quote:
Number of Posts: 108522
quote:
Pels Talk is a cesspool nowadays
Pot, let me introduce to kettle. You realize that you're a big reason why Pels Talk is a cesspool right?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:47 pm to shel311
quote:
It's clear as day an upgrade.
People wonder why the Nets arent jumping over any BI trade, well you know why now
Popular
Back to top


1



