- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 hypothetical Pels-Lakers trades
Posted on 6/13/19 at 12:26 pm to Puddinhead
Posted on 6/13/19 at 12:26 pm to Puddinhead
It's not. The Phoenix offer is the worst.
Warren + Ingram is pretty good, but 3 top 6 picks in a mediocre draft isn't what the Pels should be looking for.
Not sure why everyone is upset with this article- the last deal is the deadline offer, only we now know the pick is #4, not in the teens. Makes sense to sub Lonzo out, whom we don't want anyway because of LaVar nonsense
Warren + Ingram is pretty good, but 3 top 6 picks in a mediocre draft isn't what the Pels should be looking for.
Not sure why everyone is upset with this article- the last deal is the deadline offer, only we now know the pick is #4, not in the teens. Makes sense to sub Lonzo out, whom we don't want anyway because of LaVar nonsense
1
Posted on 6/13/19 at 12:54 pm to corndeaux
Those 2 top 6 picks can get you 2 of Hunter, Garland, White or Culver. That’s pretty good.... the other pick would be a future pick for a franchise who hasn’t proved anything in the last decade. The problem with that trade, is why the hell would the suns give up a start, 2 picks and take a bad contract for lonzo ball? You offer that package for jrue holiday, not ball.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News