- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The best hire ever?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 10:49 am
Posted on 12/14/18 at 10:49 am
It really all started right here.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 10:51 am to LanierSpots
Buckingham/Nicks being absorbed by the old Fleetwood Mac is the best money decision in the history of rock and roll.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 11:14 am to wareaglepete
Great responses up in here.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 11:25 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Buckingham/Nicks being absorbed by the old Fleetwood Mac is the best money decision in the history of rock and roll.
Was awesome but without Gilmour Im not sure Floyd (that most of us know) would have ever happened.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 11:28 am to LanierSpots
Not only that, but what if Syd had not gone crazy? Would Gilmore still have been in a position somewhere to be famous?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 12:55 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Buckingham/Nicks being absorbed by the old Fleetwood Mac is the best money decision in the history of rock and roll.
Moneywise Guns N Roses would probably disagree
Posted on 12/14/18 at 1:00 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Not only that, but what if Syd had not gone crazy? Would Gilmore still have been in a position somewhere to be famous?
That is a good question and one that have been talked about a lot.
I will give you my personal opinion for what its worth. I am older than most and have been through all phases of Floyd. I personally do not believe that Pink Floyd with a healthy Sid would have ever been as successful as they are since David joined. I know he was responsible for the name and for starting things but soon after he left, the psychodelic 60's were ending and music was changing. Im not sure Sid wanted or would agree to change the sound of the band. I also do not believe he had the personality to thrive like Roger and David
The sound of Pink Floyd "adjusted" throughout the many years they were around. Plus, David Gilmour is probably one of the best rhythm guitarist of all time. I am not sure Sid could have pulled off some of the things David did.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 3:13 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Moneywise Guns N Roses would probably disagree
I'm not sure any personnel changes from the classic lineup were "money" decisions. If anything, losing Izzy probably shortened what could have been an ever greater GnR impact, rather than Axl's meandering (but occasionally brilliant) output after that.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 3:39 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
I'm not sure any personnel changes from the classic lineup were "money" decisions. If anything, losing Izzy probably shortened what could have been an ever greater GnR impact, rather than Axl's meandering (but occasionally brilliant) output after that.
Unfortunately they did not last long enough to really get a long term ROI
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:09 pm to LanierSpots
Sid Vicious was a definite upgrade to Glen Matlock
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:12 pm to LanierSpots
Picking up Ronnie Wood worked out pretty well for the Stones.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:23 pm to FightinTigersDammit
Mick Taylor was better
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:47 pm to DeltaTigerDelta
Wood lasted longer.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 7:13 pm to Ace Midnight
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 5:50 am
Posted on 12/14/18 at 7:50 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Picking up Ronnie Wood worked out pretty well for the Stones.
Yes, but probably didn't make a big difference in the popularity/sales/longevity of the Stones as a band.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News