Started By
Message

New guitar obsession. Maple neck and fretboards. It's not natural. Lol

Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:01 pm
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27872 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:01 pm
I think I am fixated on them in an unhealthy way. Even looked at a few Washburn acoustics with maple finger boards.

Buying a future maple neck stratocaster is just a given. Even if it will make me look like the "most overrated" guitarist of all time according to this board.

Anybody else fixated on maple? Any drawbacks to it other than the early signs of wear?
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:08 pm to
Mahogany & Rosewood
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27872 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:14 pm to
That is my other neck. My LP copy has maple neck and ebony fret
Posted by RabidTiger
Member since Nov 2009
3127 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 10:41 pm to
I love maple neck fenders lately. They just feel clean to me.

I actually like that the fingerboard wood is "sealed" (probably not the technically correct word) so it gets dirty, but you can just wipe it off with a damp rag. My rosewood and ebony boards get all kinds of gunk and stuff built up on them.
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1383 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:10 am to
I wouldn't want a maple fingerboard on an acoustic. Rosewood and ebony are woods of choice for acoustics not only for cosmetics or feel, has to do with density and the subsequent resonance and percussive qualities they add to an acoustic's wood mix. Huge role in an acoustic's high end and presence, and the "snap" versus subtlety under your hands. Maple is actually a spongy'er wood on the EQ spectrum and you only get "bright," "snap," percussive, etc., when you employ a big slab of it, like on a neck husk.

That being said, I love a raw feeling maple board and neck on a strat. My finish of choice is Watco Danish oil, used as more of a thin sealer coat versus an actual finish. It feels and behaves like a guitar that's been played heavily for years, like a well worn-in baseball glove. If you remember old San Dimas Charvels and bolt-on Jacksons, they used Watco to give those necks the old worn-in feel straight from the factory.

It also stains and browns/grays out over time, which some folks like or dislike. I personally love that look.
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 7:11 am
Posted by RockAndRollDetective
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
4506 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:52 am to
Love it on my newer strat. I have an older strat with an ebony fretboard and the difference in sound and overall behavior of the two guitars, it's kind of amazing that they're the same make and model. They're worlds apart.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56200 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 9:59 am to
Richlite is the future for fretboards that are not maple.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27872 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:20 pm to
What is it?
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
7002 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:23 pm to
lots of makers using it now, even on X series Martins

https://www.richlite.com/
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1383 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:23 pm to
I don't think Richlite is going to be the future because a.) it's a lackluster (and I'm being very polite in my assessment of it) synthetic, in a world of consumers (and builders for that matter) that are tradition/purists who will pay for tradition, even if a synthetic (Richlite or anything else) is as good or better.

And b.) because even with CITES restrictions in place for rosewood, there is simply SO MUCH rosewood in circulation inside the US that can be recycled or re-purposed legally, it's not a rare wood by any stretch. There's actually more Brazilian rosewood around the US for guitars in the US than guitar manufacturing marketing machines would lead you to believe.

Ebony is not affected by the 2016 CITES revisions to my knowledge.
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
7002 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:26 pm to
you are right, it is not going to replace real wood on moderate to upper end guitars, but for student style guitars it could become the norm
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56200 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 1:18 pm to
This article is a couple of years old. I never heard of Richlite until I discovered this article a few days ago.

Richlite

This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 1:19 pm
Posted by MontanaMax
Oxford, MS
Member since Nov 2011
1978 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 1:54 pm to
What are the general thoughts/reviews of Washburn guitars? I went by a store where I live to buy a used Taylor but found that it had been sold. Found a Washburn, which a know nothing about, and liked how it played.
Posted by Loubacca
sittin on the dock of the bay
Member since Feb 2005
4157 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 2:57 pm to
I have a low-end Washburn that I have learned on for the past 3 years. It was ready to go right out the box. It had low action and it stays in tune well. Not bad for a $150 guitar.
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 2:58 pm
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1383 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:15 pm to
I briefly had a Chinese-made Washburn 10 or 15 years ago that was off the scale good in the bang-for-the-buck category. It had a solid spruce top, which was practically unheard of in its price range at the time. Really big and balanced sound and it played itself after a refined set-up. I don't remember the exact model mine was, but a quick Google search for its modern equivalent or very close to it appears to be the Heritage 10 series. I'm finding them for under $300 new. That's a deal IMHO.
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15387 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Any drawbacks to it other than the early signs of wear

I have never heard of this. If anything I have more wear on rosewood fretboards, as it's a much softer wood, and over the years your fingers press little divots into the fretboard. As someone else said, maple is much easier to clean because it just wipes off.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

that are tradition/purists who will pay for tradition, even if a synthetic (Richlite or anything else) is as good or better. 


My main is a Les Paul custom. If they changed something that dramatic to the LP standards, I'd be pissed off.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27872 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 5:32 pm to
I guess I will just stick with a maple neck Strat.

3 guitars for a guy who sucks should be plenty? Lol
Posted by MontanaMax
Oxford, MS
Member since Nov 2011
1978 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 5:49 pm to
This place have a wide range of washburns at this place ranging in price from right around $100 to, the most expensive that I saw, $1,200 ish. The one I played was a cutaway acoustic electric for about $630 something. I've never looked into them and had no idea if they were worth it.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27872 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 8:02 pm to
The GC here in Katy had a used Washburn. That damned thing was pretty for $350.

But, yes they are like Guild in that they have stuff all over the place price wise. Not saying they are Guild-good though. Guilds best offerings are damned awesome.

Washburn seems to give zero effs about woods too. They have some maple neck and fretted acoustics I believe. If you find one that feels and sounds right you just buy it. Not many people saying Washburns are garbage. Just very guitar by guitar specific, but they all are.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram