Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Musicians/Vocalists vs Just Vocalists

Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:34 am
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26883 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:34 am
Anyone else automatically think a little less of a lead singer or solo artist who doesn't play an instrument live? Just standing there with a mic.
Posted by Spaulding Smails
Milano’s Bar
Member since Jun 2012
18805 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:36 am to
Not really...Mick Jagger is pretty damn talented
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23687 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:38 am to
Bob Pollard writes most of Guided by Voices songs, but doesn't play an instrument on stage...

But then again, if he did, we'd miss out on all the leg kicks, mic twirling, beer drinking and tequila swilling that he does on stage... And that would be unfortunate...
Posted by tigermeat
Member since Jan 2005
3371 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 12:01 pm to
A lead singer? No. None of my favorite vocalists play an instrument, except their voices.
Posted by LuckySo-n-So
Member since Jul 2005
22756 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 12:36 pm to
If someone has a voice like Linda Ronstadt or Adele, they don't need to play an instrument.
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
30430 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Anyone else automatically think a little less of a lead singer or solo artist who doesn't play an instrument live?


yes
Posted by TigerPanzer
Orlando
Member since Sep 2006
9476 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 9:33 am to
The only instruments Sinatra played were Lucky Strike cigarettes and whatever he was drinking. Greatest pop singer of them all.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87748 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 11:48 am to
Yes. I like great vocal talent, but I've known plenty of great singers who have put little or moderate effort into their craft. I don't know any great musicians who have done so.
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 1:37 pm to
Depends on the singer. For example, I would think less of Dave Matthews if he wasn't also contributing to the band with the guitar.

Guys like Steve Perry, on voice alone, were/are the defining part of their band. David Lee Roth was respected for his voice and his entertainment. Very few, can stand on being a frontman and voice alone. Steven Tyler, Mick Jagger, Freddie Mercury, Steve Perry, etc are all in that group.
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Depends on the singer. For example, I would think less of Dave Matthews if he wasn't also contributing to the band with the guitar.


You would miss Daves very average guitar playing?
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 5:48 pm to
No. Just saying him playing at least makes me respect him to a degree. Would not if he were just a singer as he is not great at that either.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26883 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:50 am to
Dave is known more for his writing than his playing. And he's an expert recruiter
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26883 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:51 am to
quote:

Guys like Steve Perry, on voice alone, were/are the defining part of their band. David Lee Roth was respected for his voice and his entertainment. Very few, can stand on being a frontman and voice alone. Steven Tyler, Mick Jagger, Freddie Mercury, Steve Perry, etc are all in that group.



Well said. I agree with that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram