Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

If you had a very successful band, how long would you continue to make albums?

Posted on 6/15/12 at 2:32 pm
Posted by Nativebullet
Plano, TX
Member since Feb 2011
5171 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 2:32 pm
Take The Doors for instance, not by choice, but they were together roughly 6 years with 6 studio albums. And they are legends.

The Beatles = 10 years, 12 albums.
U2 = Since 76 to present, approx 12 albums.
Nirvana = 7 years, 3 albums.
Aerosmith = 40 years, approx 15 albums.

I believe bands stay together too long which ultimately diminishes their value (like with any good product) I realize "as long as you sell, why not"...but I would look at the bigger picture and leave on top.

I say 10 years, 7 albums would be ideal. And don't do "reunion tours". What y'all think?
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
34316 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

how long would you continue to make albums?

until I died from a drug overdose
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

If you had a very successful band, how long would you continue to make albums?



RHCP:
1984 - the present = 28 years 10 albums.

As long as you are still having fun, playing music for the sake of music, and love what you are doing you can keep it up forever. Their sound has changed greatly over the years but i love and respect every album of theirs for different reasons.
Posted by Sal Minella
Member since Nov 2006
1951 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 6:30 pm to
Rush = 38 years and 20 studio albums. There album released Tuesday is great, they still put on a great show and don't show many signs of wear.

Keep 'em going!
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69646 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

As long as you are still having fun, playing music for the sake of music, and love what you are doing you can keep it up forever.


Absolutely this. If you enjoy it, and people still like your work, why in the world would you just quit? Artistic integrity?
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 7:36 pm to
I would pull a Beatles, break up in our prime right after arguably our best album and one of the greatest albums of all time.

Just cause.
Posted by URHatinIt
Member since Dec 2011
4684 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 7:44 pm to
Until we couldn't put on a good show or ran out of ideas.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
42630 posts
Posted on 6/15/12 at 9:21 pm to
Melvins and Napalm Death have both been around 20+ years with 20+ albums and still making great music.
Posted by MondayMorningMarch
Pumping Sunshine. She's cute!
Member since Dec 2006
19670 posts
Posted on 6/16/12 at 12:37 am to
I would call it quits after 33 1/3 years just because it's such a cool number. Radiate!
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 6/16/12 at 12:48 am to
I agree with Breesus here. I'd keep going until it just didn't feel right anymore. As long as I'm having fun doing what I love, why stop?
Now, going on a hiatus for a while is needed, several times. Disappear for a while and escape giving it all a break, that's what would keep things fresh for yourself and the fans.
Posted by parrotdr
Cesspool of Rationalization
Member since Oct 2003
7960 posts
Posted on 6/16/12 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

As long as I'm having fun doing what I love, why stop?


Exactly. Way back in the day Mick Jagger was quoted as saying "I'd rather be dead than singing satisfaction when i'm forty-five". This year he turns 69!

It ain't the money, it's fun. I'd do it as long as the Stones have. Hell, most of us have to work a regular, boring job that long...why wouldn't you stay active in music!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram