- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Humbucker Guitar comparison: Les Paul and Gibson SG.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 2:51 pm to Ace Midnight
Posted on 5/19/16 at 2:51 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
I don't think he ever cared for it because it felt cheap and looked cheaper (to him)
Oh it's easy to guess why Mr. Paul didn't like the new body style: it DID look cheaper because it was more thin and has less wood, it had the two horns, which was a radically and completely different look from the 1960 LP with the single cutaway shape.
Here's a great website from a Luthier in Las Vegas and his observations on the design of the Les Paul. It's a great read.
LINK
Posted on 5/19/16 at 3:14 pm to Champagne
quote:
that when the PAF HBs were made at the Gibson factory, the manufacturing technique was not automated, so, many of the pups were accidentally wound to different specifications -- so they did not all sound the same.
No question that every one of them was different. Just like a Rolls Royce or anything else handmade. There were some efforts made by obsessive folks to figure out which Gibson worker worked which shifts during which periods, because each worker had a certain style, some wound hotter pickups, other wound cooler - FWIW I think the hotter ones didn't last as long, IIRC.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 3:15 pm to Champagne
Posted on 5/19/16 at 3:35 pm to Champagne
quote:
Here's a great website from a Luthier in Las Vegas and his observations on the design of the Les Paul. It's a great read.
I've heard all the horror stories. The only Les Pauls that don't break are the Les Pauls in the hands of collectors, not players. Even though I consider myself much more the former, not the latter, I still went with Fender. I love Strats. I'm probably going to stick with Fender (and Jackson) for all solid body guitars going forward. I haven't ruled out a hardtail HSH Strat at some point to get a humbucker, but you know what? Ibanez makes some of the nicest $350 to $500 guitars you can find, and you can put almost any pickup you want on them - have a "Les Paul" for about 1/3 the price.
So, I don't have a burning desire to own an overpriced Gibson guitar - my overpriced American made Fender at half the price was overpriced enough.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 3:45 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
There were some efforts made by obsessive folks to figure out which Gibson worker worked which shifts during which periods, because each worker had a certain style, some wound hotter pickups, other wound cooler - FWIW I think the hotter ones didn't last as long, IIRC
That is hilarious!
Posted on 5/19/16 at 3:50 pm to Champagne
quote:
That is hilarious!
You know, with the internet, there is still a robust market for "original" PAF pickups (essentially seeking out specific specs on the pre automatic winding days - it's amazing how much effort folks go to in order to get the "right" gear, when they should be practicing.)
This post was edited on 5/19/16 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 5/19/16 at 3:51 pm to TheFretShack
quote:
Straight from the man himself ...
So Les Paul himself says that the Gibson SG neck is so badly designed and manufactured that it will break in your hands while playing, if you try to bend the neck a little bit for vibrato -- and he's talking about the Gibson product during the "Golden Age" of Gibson quality the very early 1960s!
This post was edited on 5/19/16 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 5/19/16 at 3:54 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
So, I don't have a burning desire to own an overpriced Gibson guitar - my overpriced American made Fender at half the price was overpriced enough
So many great used guitars out there that are great. Hard to pick one.
This post was edited on 5/26/17 at 9:57 am
Posted on 5/19/16 at 7:02 pm to Champagne
quote:
I don't believe those folks who say that they can hear a difference when the Marshall stack is pushing the tubes into a clip on the oscillation scope.
I believe this to be correct.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:15 pm to Champagne
What?? On this Music Board we don't get plenty of participation in a thread talking about the devices which made some of the best music ever?

Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:43 pm to Champagne
I thought we had an amp and effects thread going for a while - nothing like the audiophile/vinyl thread, but it was something.
Or - maybe I dreamed it.
Or - maybe I dreamed it.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:28 pm to Ace Midnight
There are SO many high quality amps and effects available these days.
That's why the early days of rock n roll are so fascinating.
That's why the early days of rock n roll are so fascinating.
This post was edited on 5/26/17 at 9:56 am
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:42 pm to TheFretShack
quote:
Straight from the man himself ...
I have been thinking about his comments in this You Tube video and I'm going to take his reasons for not liking the SG body on the LP with a grain of salt.
This post was edited on 5/26/17 at 9:55 am
Posted on 5/20/16 at 8:29 am to Champagne
Thanks for the kind words, C. Where in west Louisiana are you?
I agree that LP probably had a general resentment towards the SG but he makes some valid and some understandable ones.
* On the cutaway issue, pull some YouTube videos of Les performing back in his prime. I don't know if it's the physical size or the way he grips the neck (left hand pinky often extended), but he appears to have pretty huge mitts haha. I don't think his sig guitar's design and its massive neck/body joint is going to slow him down too much. Those pointed SG cutaways, however ... watch him play in the 60s and you can understand how his style had him banging into the SG's bat wings.
* On the sustain thing, keep in mind there were no effects, particularly pedals - at least nothing readily available - in the 50s and early 60s. Chasing sustain via guitar construction was one of few solutions that existed. That's why LP's early solidbody prototype ("the log") and what became his sig guitar are massive in the purest sense of the word.
* On the "weak and would break," he's likely referring to the neck joint. It's undersized by necessity and poorly jointed compared to traditional LP construction. Even Gibson realized this after the fact.
Here's the original SG neck/body joint design ... this joint is more prone to breakage and guitars with this joint are more often in need of neck resets during their lifespan. Notice in the photo how much of that neck tenon will have to be removed once the neck is installed in order to make room for the neck humbucker. Very little actual wood will be left when it's done.
... the joint was revisited in the mid-60s and the revision continues today. (that's a more modern maple capped body, but the joint design is the focus here, the tenon ... "tongued" like a LP)
* Found these clips on YouTube that sheds a little light on what I was talking about on LP versus SG sound-wise and the presence/absence of that massive maple cap. Even through small computer speakers, you can hear the SG is more midrange dominent/focused compared to the capped LP. Notice the difference is very subtle and the test is not in a rock band trio format with a Marshall haha.
Demo 1
Demo 2
If anything, the clips tell me you're not missing much in a band context, or in a controlled environment for that matter.
Actually you are missing something important with the SG in a band scenario - weight and player comfort. My personal Les Paul is a monster player and righteous tone machine, but if I played that heavy girl on stage for three hours I'd be in rehab on my couch all the following day.
I agree that LP probably had a general resentment towards the SG but he makes some valid and some understandable ones.
* On the cutaway issue, pull some YouTube videos of Les performing back in his prime. I don't know if it's the physical size or the way he grips the neck (left hand pinky often extended), but he appears to have pretty huge mitts haha. I don't think his sig guitar's design and its massive neck/body joint is going to slow him down too much. Those pointed SG cutaways, however ... watch him play in the 60s and you can understand how his style had him banging into the SG's bat wings.
* On the sustain thing, keep in mind there were no effects, particularly pedals - at least nothing readily available - in the 50s and early 60s. Chasing sustain via guitar construction was one of few solutions that existed. That's why LP's early solidbody prototype ("the log") and what became his sig guitar are massive in the purest sense of the word.
* On the "weak and would break," he's likely referring to the neck joint. It's undersized by necessity and poorly jointed compared to traditional LP construction. Even Gibson realized this after the fact.
Here's the original SG neck/body joint design ... this joint is more prone to breakage and guitars with this joint are more often in need of neck resets during their lifespan. Notice in the photo how much of that neck tenon will have to be removed once the neck is installed in order to make room for the neck humbucker. Very little actual wood will be left when it's done.
... the joint was revisited in the mid-60s and the revision continues today. (that's a more modern maple capped body, but the joint design is the focus here, the tenon ... "tongued" like a LP)
* Found these clips on YouTube that sheds a little light on what I was talking about on LP versus SG sound-wise and the presence/absence of that massive maple cap. Even through small computer speakers, you can hear the SG is more midrange dominent/focused compared to the capped LP. Notice the difference is very subtle and the test is not in a rock band trio format with a Marshall haha.
Demo 1
Demo 2
If anything, the clips tell me you're not missing much in a band context, or in a controlled environment for that matter.
Actually you are missing something important with the SG in a band scenario - weight and player comfort. My personal Les Paul is a monster player and righteous tone machine, but if I played that heavy girl on stage for three hours I'd be in rehab on my couch all the following day.
This post was edited on 5/20/16 at 8:50 am
Posted on 5/20/16 at 8:54 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
So, I don't have a burning desire to own an overpriced Gibson guitar
That's all about perspective. I have owned easily over 15 guitars in my life. Im down to two right now. A Warmoth Mahogany Tele with a Fender Deluxe Neck and dual humbuckers (essentially a Les Paul with a maple neck) and my 07 Gibson Les Paul Standard. My Les Paul is my baby and I have a bond with it. We know each other. When Im really drunk, we talk to each. I can pull sounds out of that guitar that I cannot out of any other guitar. You also cannot duplicate the feel of a Gibson neck. It is vastly superior to a Fender neck, again that is just my opinion.
Other guitars owned...
2008 Gibson Les Paul Studio (should have never sold)
PRS Singlecut (pre-lawsuit)
PRS Singlecut SE
PRS Santana SE
2012 Fender American Strat
2006 Fender Deluxe Strat (Mexi)
2008 Fender Classic 60's Strat (Mexi)
Charvel San Dimas
Warmoth SuperStrat Charvel Clone w/Floyd
Other's that Im forgetting.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 9:40 am to TheFretShack
quote:
Actually you are missing something important with the SG in a band scenario - weight and player comfort.
No less than Angus Young (think how awesome it must be to play the same music, over and over, have your singer sing different lyrics, call them different songs, and make millions, right?) famously said:
"I'm a little guy. I tried a Les Paul once, but the SG was more balanced."
Plus - the devil horns.
Interesting that when they were young and broke, his primary guitar was a SG, Malcom played a Gretsh and they shared a spare - a Tele with a humbucker at the bridge. If Angus broke a string, he could play the bridge pickup on the Tele - if Malcolm did, he could use the Tele neck pickup.
Again, I love these crazy stories about these guitars.
This post was edited on 5/20/16 at 9:43 am
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:30 am to TheFretShack
quote:
Where in west Louisiana are you?
I live near Lafayette.
This post was edited on 5/26/17 at 9:54 am
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:02 am to TheFretShack
quote:
you can hear the SG is more midrange dominent/focused compared to the capped LP.
Thanks for the post. I am very interested in this stuff.
This post was edited on 5/26/17 at 9:53 am
Popular
Back to top


2



