Started By
Message

re: How much does this factor in to todays music being raw sewage

Posted on 5/24/19 at 7:54 pm to
Posted by Malefic Runt
Try my robe
Member since Oct 2018
1266 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 7:54 pm to
Idk why that post got dv'd to death was just a joke about how obscure some of the bands ive seen you mention
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11345 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

Curious to hear your list. Looking for new stuff.


In no particular order:

The Tallest Man on Earth- I Love You. It’s a Fever Dream
Pup- Morbid Stuff
Big Thief- U.F.O.F
Vampire Weekend- Father of the Bride
Avery Tare- Cows On Hourglass Pond
The National- I Am Easy to Find
Weyes Blood- Titanic Rising
Field Medic- fade into the dawn

Been kind of a folk/singer songwriter heavy year. Not a ton of rock that has struck me yet.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
66969 posts
Posted on 5/25/19 at 12:07 am to
Jade Bird - Little Boy
The Struts - Could Have Been Me
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 5/25/19 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

I knew streaming payouts were paltry, but DAMN. Apparently having a "viral" hit is the only way to pay the bills musically besides filling arenas 



It's been that way since mp3 killed the video star
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12707 posts
Posted on 5/25/19 at 5:50 pm to
quote:


I don’t get the whole rap is invading everything point either. Rap is as popular as ever probably, but there is plenty of good music being made that has nothing to do with rap.


Yeah, if anything, isn’t it electronic music/edm that’s crossing over and infiltrating other genres?
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
10922 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 5:10 am to
Nice reply* - to OP's cents vs. scents.

Might add the whole business of being scene/seen has changed with both the online and digital revolutions.

Gone is the day of absolutely needing a label to get your music out there. So the sheer volume of other avenues/mediums now means there's a lot less filtering of what we hear. And consequently a lot more options to hear music that money-mined people wouldn't have taken a risk on... and with less filtering a greater chance for the shitty to be heard. It just goes along with there being more options.

And there's also the familiarity factor of being offered the same something over and over. Now with 3sec sampling, you can run through an artist's whole catalog in spurts, for next to nothing and then forget about them. Like OP said - parts of a penny and done. However back when you had no control radio vs internet, it allowed a song to grow on you. If not from being force feed into liking or hating, then because because of the album format and buying the thing. . . And having the b-side or half of the other thirteen grow on you (and so you buy more).

Plus you can buy it now for life and just download another copy for free. It's not so with hard copy LP's, tape, and CD's. I've bought quite a few of the same over and over again.



*Thanks, for the interesting take.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Spotify pays around $0.006 to 0.0084 per stream


Sounds like some lawyers need to get together and raise the percentage for artists
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
20720 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Midget Death Squad


Agree completely. Streaming services didn’t hurt music. It just changed the way we access music and the way bands get it out there. It’s hard to definitively say that pre streaming was better or vise versa but IMO music would be in a much worse state today without pirating and streaming that began in the 2000’s. Radio was being bought out at the time by clearchannel and payola was pushing shitty artists onto the radio, like Nickelback.

I never truly discovered my musical taste until I started searching on my own through band forums (similar to this one) and downloading music to see what I like. I bought more physical copies by far after pirating and streaming became available than before. It was too much of a risk before because I didn’t want to spend $15-20 on an album that may just have a couple good songs than me going to buy an album that I love and appreciate because I’ve listened to it several times. I know the label is getting most of that but I also am going to concerts for those bands any time they come around.

To sum it up, Streaming has mad music better IMO. Those that are unhappy with the current state of music would have been as unhappy or more unhappy without it, as most of the stuff available would be ultra filtered and watered down crap.
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
10912 posts
Posted on 5/28/19 at 9:08 am to
I am a rock guy. I have listened to new acts like The Struts, Rival Sons, Ghost, etc. and they are decent bands, but it is really just ok. Nothing really stirring or innovative there. They are just rehashing a lot.
There just needs to be something to re-energize rock music. I have no idea what that is though. There are only so many chords and notes. How many more different sounds are there out there?
I think things like Pro Tools have stifled innovation. It is great that anyone can go out and make a song and it get heard, but with the ease of being able to do it, I believe it takes away the hard work needed to develop and learn. It takes away the ability for new things to come about even by accident.

I also love old pop music. That genre just seems like they aren't even trying anymore. The same beats over and over again with one synth track and someone singing or talking over it. It is horrible.
This post was edited on 5/28/19 at 9:14 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram