Started By
Message

re: does it make you mad paying more for mp3 than a CD?

Posted on 4/15/13 at 10:52 am to
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94752 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Can you elaborate on this?


are you implying you can't tell the difference between uncompressed and a 128k mp3?
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 11:04 am to
You said:

quote:

oh yeah. at first I thought 128kb mp3s sounded as good as a CD

then a friend (ben folds' studio sound engineer) taught me how to notice the cut-off and I realized just how awful they sounded.


I'm asking you to elaborate on what your friend told you that allowed to "notice the cut-off". If you could do that instead of responding to a question with a question, that would help move things along more smoothly.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34717 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Are your listening sources mostly CD'S or do you prefer to listen to FLAC files or lossles Mp3 files?


Honestly, I usually listen to MP3 for portability. If I want quality, I'll go 5.1.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94752 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 11:28 am to
quote:

I'm asking you to elaborate on what your friend told you that allowed to "notice the cut-off".


he pointed out what it sounded like when some of the dynamic range was removed.

then we listened to the same track from the audio CD.

it was the audio equivalent of looking at a heavily pixelated photograph.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

are you implying you can't tell the difference between uncompressed and a 128k mp3?


I've never taken this particular taste test. I'll try it out.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram