Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Acoustic guitar purchase—-help needed

Posted on 5/21/20 at 1:34 pm
Posted by BILLFISHER22
Houma
Member since Oct 2009
1445 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 1:34 pm
Hey guys, I’m looking to purchase my first acoustic and need some guidance. I’m an electric player and I’m having a hard time getting the feel for the thickness of the body on acoustics.... I’m thinking on the lines of a thin/thinnish body in the $500-800 range. Any recommendations or tips would be much appreciated. Hope everyone is staying healthy and sane. Thank you guys in advance!!!
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38649 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 2:09 pm to
Electric guys usually like Taylor's.
Posted by TheCurmudgeon
Not where I want to be
Member since Aug 2014
1481 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 2:14 pm to
If size is an issue don't look at/get a dreadnaught, look for a 000 or an OM (orchestra model). a bit thinner/smaller
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29262 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 4:03 pm to
martin
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
10924 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

martin
He'd find a Martin neck way too thick and wide.

You ever checked out any of K.Yairi's (Alvarez Yairi)? To me they have a much thinner and narrower neck than most dreadnoughts.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27798 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 5:07 pm to
Don't, get one of those that are as thin as an electric, you will never be satisfied with the sound of it.
Posted by lsu1919
Member since May 2017
3244 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 9:08 pm to
Just play everything in your price range and 1-2 will jump out at you. Go from there.

Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:03 pm to
I like an applause too, nostalgic purposes. Taylors are legit though.
This post was edited on 5/21/20 at 10:06 pm
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35473 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 8:26 am to
Love my Taylor but it's out of the budget range of the OP.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 8:32 am to
quote:

I’m having a hard time getting the feel for the thickness of the body on acoustics.... I’m thinking on the lines of a thin/thinnish body in the $500-800 range.


Ovations with the super shallow bowl might be just what the doctor ordered - they're always going to sound better plugged in - just the nature of it. I'm in the minority, of course, but I dig Ovations.

Posted by BILLFISHER22
Houma
Member since Oct 2009
1445 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 1:03 pm to
Thank you guys for the input. I’ll check them all out.
Posted by BILLFISHER22
Houma
Member since Oct 2009
1445 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 1:07 pm to
VA, what Taylor do you have? What are we talking on price? I’m not married to that range if the right guitar comes along.
Posted by BILLFISHER22
Houma
Member since Oct 2009
1445 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

He'd find a Martin neck way too thick and wide.


I don’t mind thick necks, it’s the body that bothers me. Is the neck thicker than a 50’s Les Paul?
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35473 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 10:08 pm to
Grand Pacific 317e. I love it. Around 2 grand. Fantastic reviews.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27798 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

I don’t mind thick necks, it’s the body that bothers me.


The body thickness is something that you will get used to, if you find a guitar that sounds and plays great. Those are the main things to look for, sound quality and playability, of course structurally sound too. Make sure to check out some used ones, and look for a deal.
A quality guitar with some scratches, is better than a beauty, that never sounds right. The best acoustic guitar that I own now(maybe ever) came from a pawn shop and cost 250 bucks. It's a Takamine that was made in Japan and has a few scratches on the cedar top, back and sides are perfect though. I couldn't spend 1,000 bucks and get a better guitar.
Also be sure and check out the Canadian Guitars, Simon & Patrick, Seagull, Norman.
This post was edited on 5/23/20 at 12:01 am
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
52302 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

Love my Taylor but it's out of the budget range of the OP.


OP should check out some used Taylors.

I got a Taylor 210 with some buckle rash for $400 on Facebook Marketplace a few years back.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27798 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

I got a Taylor 210 with some buckle rash for $400 on Facebook Marketplace a few years back.


That was a really good buy.
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
10924 posts
Posted on 5/23/20 at 7:44 am to
quote:

quote:

quote: He'd find a Martin neck way too thick and wide.
I don’t mind thick necks, it’s the body that bothers me. Is the neck thicker than a 50’s Les Paul?

Don't know the answer to that... so I looked this up.

This is (supposedly) the differences in Les Paul necks over the years. (from here). The differences to look for in acoustics is fretboard width, as well neck thickness, and overall taper from nut to body. There's also different shapes from various 'C' shapes, to more 'V' type shapes, to other type of changing arches/radius as you go up or down.

Some people like the larger necks and I mentioned Martin's because historically they are on the large side. They've just recently (decade or so) started offering thinner options. As to good or not, many of their old-school guys often go no bueno, and finger pickers also tend to prefer wider fretboards for the extra distance between strings.

Was just throwing out don't automatically think 'Oh, Martin, it's better'. And be careful of low cost mid 70's models their user group forums (non-company affiliated) will have large discussions why.
This post was edited on 5/23/20 at 7:51 am
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1237 posts
Posted on 5/23/20 at 8:29 am to
Keep in mind too that it was only recently that CNC became commonplace cutting necks ... before that, six different guys contoured six carve-spec necks with very rough templates and subsequent variances.

And then how passive or aggressive the sander is during the sanding process further influences contours.

Then you have things like neck accidentally got dropped, or pinged against a table edge, and a nick needs to be sanded out to pass QC? Presto, a spot neck contour variation.

My point is even specs that allegedly don't deviate, use as a rough gauge. Don't swear by them. And if they are that important, try before you buy or secure from a vendor with a liberal return policy, where you can get your money back "because the neck just doesn't feel right" to you.

And if small body and low action are priorities, get an electric and play it clean perhaps? Or fit it with a piezo and utilize acoustic amps, acoustic sims, acoustic plug-ins? Lot more optioms from which to pick too. Just a thought.
Posted by BILLFISHER22
Houma
Member since Oct 2009
1445 posts
Posted on 5/23/20 at 9:44 am to
All great info to consider. Thank you all for your input, it’s much appreciated!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram