Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The practical effects of The Odyssey… maybe a spoiler…

Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:54 pm
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40960 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:54 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
76349 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:55 pm to
Cerci- another completely misrepresented character in that skin suit movie
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40960 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:58 pm to
Didn’t know anything about that until now. Just saw this tweet.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
76349 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 8:01 pm to
What a waste
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
15676 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:39 pm to
Nolan going all practical effects on the Odyssey was certainly a choice. If any movie needed special effects to really capture the material this one was it.

That scene in particular was pretty bad without some CGI. When the pigs were turning back into men there was one particularly bad pan cut behind Circe’s robe that made it so obvious it destroyed the illusion.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
55130 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:14 am to
We should be applauding the practical effects, instead of entire movies shot with CGI that look so robotic.

Odyssey and project hail Mary were both great examples of what could be done.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Tejas
Member since Sep 2003
23142 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:23 am to
Nolan’s Circe was a disappointing fail.
Sirens also.
Polyphemus the cyclops meh.
Wrath of Poseidon just looked like a storm at sea.
Zeus thundered but no visual.
Trojan Horse was rather puny.
Good cast but lacking creative vision.
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
57692 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:25 am to
I’d like to have seen the sirens that would’ve been cool
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6563 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Left: Circe according to Nolan Right: Circe according to the Odyssey


No. The right is Circe according to a painter in the 1800s, not The Odyssey.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
28968 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

No. The right is Circe according to a painter in the 1800s, not The Odyssey.


the only interesting circe is the one depicted in the book by madeline miller.

seriously, until you read that I don't wanna hear your complaints on who she is supposed to be




edit: also just saw it's on sale for $2 on kindle LINK
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 9:48 am
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
15676 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Nolan’s Circe was a disappointing fail. Sirens also. Polyphemus the cyclops meh. Wrath of Poseidon just looked like a storm at sea. Zeus thundered but no visual. Trojan Horse was rather puny. Good cast but lacking creative vision.


All of this. I’m a big Nolan fan but he fumbled the ball on this visually.

It’ll make billions and probably win a few Oscars so it’ll be deemed very successful. But it could’ve been much more entertaining if he’d used a bit of modern movie magic. I’m not talking Marvel level CGI but just a bit sprinkled here and there to really bring out the fantasy and magic that you get from the book.
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
25559 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:10 pm to
Some real dumbass opinions in here. All the practical effects were a nice breath of fresh air.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
76349 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:30 pm to
It’s fake anyway. The mythology around Nolan is fake. He’s not into realism or authenticity, his entire filmography shows that. The only reason he made this movie the way he did was to destroy Homer’s story which he’s admitted to multiple times so when the virus reacts to your correct statement just know they’re only validating it.
Posted by DoomGuy504
Member since May 2024
677 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 12:46 am to
quote:

We should be applauding the practical effects, instead of entire movies shot with CGI that look so robotic.



It's insane how fast people will throw their views in the trash when they have been told to fall in line. Wow. We should always be applauding practical effects. Hopefully it pushes other directors to be the same so they can have massive movies. It's hard!

Didn't the new Top Gun focus on that? Let's stay consistent.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
44475 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Nolan going all practical effects on the Odyssey was certainly a choice. If any movie needed special effects to really capture the material this one was it.

That scene in particular was pretty bad without some CGI. When the pigs were turning back into men there was one particularly bad pan cut behind Circe’s robe that made it so obvious it destroyed the illusion.


What an awful take. Movies need less CGI and more filmmakers willing to go the extra mile and do practical effects.

More CGI would have added nothing more to this movie and the Circe/pigs scene was one of the highlights of the film, even by those that didn't care for the movie.

But yea, maybe more CGI was the answer. Because with practical effects it became his biggest box office movie and made more money than any R rated movie ever. I guess that choice didn't work out for him.
Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Member since Oct 2003
6089 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 10:52 am to
Only CGI really needed was to CGI Sean Bean over Matt Damon.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
4025 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Some real dumbass opinions in here. All the practical effects were a nice breath of fresh air.

Some of these people worship Zack Snyder. Make of that what you will.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram