Started By
Message

re: The Avengers vs Man of Steel

Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:12 am to
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:12 am to
Funny thing is, DC is more grounded in real world issues than ever before, what Marvel became famous for. Now Marvel movies are lighter in tone(for now) and DC makes the social commentary.

This is a great start for DC universe,imo. Can't wait for the next movies (which should be Wonder Woman and Flash /or a villain movie).
Posted by SJS Eagle 85
P-Town
Member since Apr 2009
5007 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Man of Steel, while entertaining, is not better than any of the Marvel Phase 1 films, and is hardly better than the worst X Men film
Holy shite! Now I don't even want to see it. The first four X-Men films (including X-Men Origins: Wolverine) were an abomination and waste of 40+ years of storytelling.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38665 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:22 am to
quote:

DC is kind of stuck. The nature of DC heroes is more morally serious than what Marvel puts out, but that is apparently not what this generation of ADD movie goers wants. They want Thor, The Avengers, and Transformers.


There's a time and place for most approaches, it doesn't make them more juvenile, just different.

quote:

I'm facebook friends with people that thought Captain America was awesome. What do you even say to these people?


You say, "Yeah it was a pretty good film, I agree!"

Nothing wrong with Caps. It was a movie that played to its roots and the new Marvel thematic ideal. And it did that quite well. It was campy a bit, on purpose.
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:24 am to
quote:

, and is hardly better than the worst X Men film


this is subjective of course, but I disagree. As stated before, I think the critics sort of missed the point on this movie and it will be more fondly remembered than the current opinion on it.
Posted by JasonL79
Houston area
Member since Jan 2010
6425 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:24 am to
quote:

quote:


Man of Steel, while entertaining, is not better than any of the Marvel Phase 1 films, and is hardly better than the worst X Men film


Holy shite! Now I don't even want to see it. The first four X-Men films (including X-Men Origins: Wolverine) were an abomination and waste of 40+ years of storytelling.


These things are so subjective. I thought it was better than all of the x-men movies and still better than avengers. I enjoyed all of them but thought MOS was better.
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14835 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:27 am to
quote:

The first four X-Men films (including X-Men Origins: Wolverine) were an abomination and waste of 40+ years of storytelling.





\rant


Death to the "Wolverine The X-Man and his team of Xmen" bullshite that is being shoved down our throats.

First Class is really good so what do they do? Let's bring back frickstick Singer and ALL of the old crew.

/rant
Posted by alexman
Member since Oct 2012
678 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:42 am to
quote:

adequately awesome


I don't think I have ever seen someone use those two words together to describe something
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60933 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:48 am to
best way to describe the movie
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Death to the "Wolverine The X-Man and his team of Xmen" bullshite that is being shoved down our throats.

First Class is really good so what do they do? Let's bring back frickstick Singer and ALL of the old crew.



No shite- the part written for Cyclops was terrible and they cast an actor who falls to the background.

Cyclops, especially since he's finally been given room to grow in the comics, is just as, if not more, compelling than Wolverine. Maybe one day they'll get the part/casting right, but as long as Singer/Fox is in control, I doubt it.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15964 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:57 am to
quote:

best way to describe the movie


It makes no sense

Im going with - it was close to top tier but fell short?
This post was edited on 6/19/13 at 11:58 am
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 11:58 am to
quote:

And I'll just throw this out there and I'm serious: MoS > TDKR


And this is why I can't take your opinions seriously.
Posted by toughcrittercrumb
Houston
Member since Nov 2008
2160 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:01 pm to
I thought First Class was much better than the other X-men movies. As a whole, they could have down a much better job with the X-men movies.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15964 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

The first four X-Men films (including X-Men Origins: Wolverine) were an abomination and waste of 40+ years of storytelling.







\rant


Death to the "Wolverine The X-Man and his team of Xmen" bull shite that is being shoved down our throats.

First Class is really good so what do they do? Let's bring back frickstick Singer and ALL of the old crew.

/rant

Singer, Ratner, and the entire creative team should have been forced to retire after that BS. They destroyed my favorite X-men. The last time i checked Cyclops was not a pussy

This post was edited on 6/19/13 at 12:02 pm
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60933 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

And this is why I can't take your opinions seriously.


TDKR sucked balls. That's a fact and I think the rest of the world has finally come around to this. It's an unintentional parody, it's THAT movie our kids will make fun of us for liking so much.
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

If you think about it, MoS started off as TDKR/BB and about an hour into it became Thor.


Did you actually watch the movie? The entire beginning was Thor like with all of the krypton shite.
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

TDKR sucked balls. That's a fact and I think the rest of the world has finally come around to this. It's an unintentional parody, it's THAT movie our kids will make fun of us for liking so much.


Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:08 pm to
TDKR's main problem is that it tries to shove way too much into it. Should have just added another hour to it to properly develop the story and split it into 2 movies 6 months apart.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60933 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

TDKR's main problem is that it tries to shove way too much into it. Should have just added another hour to it to properly develop the story and split it into 2 movies 6 months apart.


I can agree with this. The same could be said for MoS and TDK.

There's a common theme here.
Posted by EthanL
Auburn,AL
Member since Oct 2011
6963 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:11 pm to
It was ridiculous. The premise (zero crime in Gotham) the plan (to blow up Gotham via an energy source turned nuke LOL) and the way to stop it all (a guy who just broke his back 2 months earlier)

Oh yeah, all the dumbass police got trapped underground...
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60933 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

It makes no sense

Im going with - it was close to top tier but fell short?


That's the way I felt when I walked out of MoS. It was very confusing for me. I've never LOVED and HATED a movie so much while watching it in the theater.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram