- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/17/10 at 8:42 pm to msukb79
Which is good thing he doesn't post over there that much. Dan is probably a good guy IRL but answer the question. Is his schtick an act or is he really that stupid?
And fwiw, I don't have a beef with you but you come to his defense morenthan I've ever seem than anyone else around here. More than any board couple.
And fwiw, I don't have a beef with you but you come to his defense morenthan I've ever seem than anyone else around here. More than any board couple.
Posted on 4/17/10 at 9:15 pm to msukb79
quote:
He's a good guy IRL
Why do people say this?
No one gives a frick. I'm never going to meet him in real life. I only care what kind of poster he is -- and he's a shitty one.
Posted on 4/17/10 at 9:18 pm to Kafka
based on how much money I put in Chicken's paypal account, he'd better be out for at least another few weeks
Posted on 4/17/10 at 9:35 pm to Uncle Stu
I thought his John Wayne vs. Elizabeth Montgomery post was both insightful and inspirational.
Vs.
Although I was a bit upset with the controversy stirred up by his
Vs.
Vs.
Although I was a bit upset with the controversy stirred up by his
Vs.
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:07 pm to msukb79
You are so gay it's not even funny
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:15 pm to TigerMyth36
Meh, Dan is kinda snooty.
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:31 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
I find it amusing that some of you have attacked me for taking things too seriously yet that was my whole point. Just don't take Dan so seriously.
Still don't feel any ban was necessary because I don't take him too seriously.
It is actually all of you that need to chill out and take things (bad posts) less seriously.
Martyr? Don't see that I came off or tried to come off as a martyr. Attack all you want, but the South Park pic was put there to show I wasn't being so serious.
We do things a touch different over here. We actually debate issues instead of attacking posters. (most times)
Really Maximus, I posted 50 times. Sure doesn't say much for the Math Department at LSU.
Also, it is my post so it is pretty normal for the person that starts the post to respond.
MJC,
Not sure what happened to you pal, you used to be fairly easy going but lately you haven't been.
Oh and once again back to me taking things to seriously, some of you have stated you could no longer come to the movie board because of Dan's posts.
Clean the sand out of it! If someones boring posts keep you from coming to a board then it is CLEARLY you that takes things too seriously.
As far as Dan is concerned, Archie hit the nail on the head. I am more concerned with censorship than Dan. Just check my posts. I have almost never posted in his nonsense.
For the most part, I stay away from the vs and lists threads unless female pics are involved.
And attack the South Park pic, but anyone that isn't being an irrational dick could see I was trying to be somewhat funny. Admittedly that failed miserably.
and Happy Saturday even to you asshats. I just left one crawfish boil and now I am off to another so I am good to go.
WoW, nothing screams i don't really care like writing a novel about something.
Also, since apparently I have been somehow been appointed the representative of LSU math majors, thats 23 total posts in this thread alone by you by my count on this joke subject that you don't care about.
Posted on 4/18/10 at 12:14 am to Maximus
You are right. I should just never respond in my own post. Sure Max.
Posted on 4/18/10 at 12:15 am to Maximus
Oh and thanks for proving my point about assholes.

This post was edited on 4/18/10 at 12:17 am
Posted on 4/18/10 at 12:27 am to Maximus
You still don't seem to be able to count to 50 there max. Keep trying.
Oh your 18 posts on Grapes sure shows how you are a legend in your own mind. Even GCS probably is shaking his head at that brilliant post.
Oh your 18 posts on Grapes sure shows how you are a legend in your own mind. Even GCS probably is shaking his head at that brilliant post.
This post was edited on 4/18/10 at 12:51 am
Posted on 4/18/10 at 1:06 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
Still don't feel any ban was necessary because I don't take him too seriously.
Posted on 4/18/10 at 10:58 am to TigerMyth36
I'm gonna agree with TigerMyth that I don't think Dan's threads were ban worthy. Look a lot of Dan's threads were certainly inane. The thing is most of you complaining about Dan's threads, well I don't see yall starting any threads at all.
People say they want quality threads here but how many times have I seen one of Kafka's TCM Alert threads fall off of page one without even a reply. I don't know maybe people here just don't care about classic movies?
Freauxzen goes through all his hard work on the Sci-Fi list last week it's been up for several days now and still it's really only a handful of us posting on it and discussing the list. Yet I'll see some thread about a crappy reality tv show end up 20 pages long.
Myself I used to write movie review threads not just "hey I've seen this movie discuss" I'd write four or so paragraphs,screen shots and even links but I'd get very little to no replies. I don't know maybe people here just don't care for under the radar movies that they've never seen or heard of?
To the people that are complaining about Dan's threads why don't yall start some threads? Show us how it's done.
People say they want quality threads here but how many times have I seen one of Kafka's TCM Alert threads fall off of page one without even a reply. I don't know maybe people here just don't care about classic movies?
Freauxzen goes through all his hard work on the Sci-Fi list last week it's been up for several days now and still it's really only a handful of us posting on it and discussing the list. Yet I'll see some thread about a crappy reality tv show end up 20 pages long.
Myself I used to write movie review threads not just "hey I've seen this movie discuss" I'd write four or so paragraphs,screen shots and even links but I'd get very little to no replies. I don't know maybe people here just don't care for under the radar movies that they've never seen or heard of?
To the people that are complaining about Dan's threads why don't yall start some threads? Show us how it's done.
This post was edited on 4/18/10 at 11:10 am
Posted on 4/18/10 at 11:20 am to TigerMyth36
Dan's posts on this board were GCS-level terrible. His banning was well warranted and should have come a lot sooner.
Posted on 4/18/10 at 6:23 pm to constant cough
so you either have to love Dan's shitty posts or post in sci-fi and oldies movies threads to keep this place going?
Posted on 4/18/10 at 6:32 pm to Maximus
quote:
so you either have to love Dan's shitty posts or post in sci-fi and oldies movies threads to keep this place going?
No. That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying if people don't like Dan's threads start better ones.
Posted on 4/18/10 at 6:34 pm to constant cough
quote:
I'm saying if people don't like Dan's threads start better ones.
+1
Posted on 4/18/10 at 6:46 pm to constant cough
quote:
I seen one of Kafka's TCM Alert threads fall off of page one without even a reply.
does he make 5 more in a day's time?
Popular
Back to top


2








