Started By
Message

re: Refn's "Only God Forgives" Is Apparently Terrible

Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:07 pm to
Posted by Rittdog
Yesterday, all my troubles seemed
Member since Oct 2009
9955 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Bronson was amazing, I couldn't wait for the movie to end.


The movie started off so great. I thought this was going to be an amazing movie......But it was just alright.

Chopper was better imo.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

possibly woman-hating



i mean

what teh frick?
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112323 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:25 pm to
Now that i went back and actually read that review


It kind of got me more excited for the movie to be honest
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Refn's becoming the Malick of noir crime thrillers

totally stealing this line. I don't like Malick either. Both completely fail as storytellers. They prefer imagery over a coherent narrative. This sounds like Drive without the great performance from Albert Brooks.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:26 pm to
Yeah, I was just thinking that this sounds like an exaggerated version of Drive, which led to me trying to determine why I enjoyed Drive so much. Brooks and to a lesser extent Cranston saved that movie.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112323 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Exaggerated version of Drive


Im perfectly okay with that
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36216 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

It's like a real life "Medellin"


Medellin was more like a fictional version of something that happens all the time.
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12268 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

I still want to see it. Even if it sucks, he's earned a pass.


I go back and forth on Winding Refn. I enjoyed Valhalla Rising to a certain extent. It was visually intriguing. Very dreamlike. Or perhaps nightmarish is a better word. But it wasn't really a great movie.

Bronson, despite Tom Hardy's great performance, was complete arse. It had no momentum at all. It simply sat stagnant as you wondered what this nut job would do next and why you cared. Then you realize you don't, and you turn it off halfway through the second act.

Drive was incredible and Winding Refn's most complete movie that I've seen. I'm still intrigued by Only God Forgives, but a little less so now.
This post was edited on 5/22/13 at 6:17 pm
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 6:47 pm to
I'm behind on Winding Refn's other works. I've only seen Drive. And based on that, I'll buy a ticket to whatever he puts out.

The Pusher trilogy is up next though.

I'm still pumped for Only God Forgives after looking at other opinions. Seems to be pretty divided, not all negative.
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 8:06 pm to
Refn fanboy here. No way it sux.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52606 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 1:59 pm to
It looks good to me. Bunch of uptight frenchies if you ask me. They probably mad that Gosling didn't show up and wanted to trash him for it.
Posted by ColaTiger
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
2193 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Ryan Gosling only has 17 lines of dialogue.


WHAT?!?!? How can you call this a movie if the star only speaks 17 lines??? Movies are supposed to have people talking and stuff!!
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32681 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

It looks good to me. Bunch of uptight frenchies if you ask me. They probably mad that Gosling didn't show up and wanted to trash him for it.
Refn is a Euro so I'd think they'd give him props if it was even average. Doesn't appear to be the case
Posted by ColaTiger
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
2193 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

I don't like Malick either. Both completely fail as storytellers. They prefer imagery over a coherent narrative.


Movies aren't books. They are movies. But I know I can't change your mind about that.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52606 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

WHAT?!?!? How can you call this a movie if the star only speaks 17 lines??? Movies are supposed to have people talking and stuff!!

Tell that to Kurt Russel in Soldier.
This post was edited on 5/23/13 at 2:28 pm
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Movies aren't books. They are movies. But I know I can't change your mind about that.

I know they aren't books. But the idea that art shouldn't say something is such a cultural cul de sac. It's just asserting your own meaninglessness. Why should I bother?
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112323 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 5:03 pm to
Holy shite
Posted by jrowla2
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
4077 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 5:45 pm to
I'm just amazed that a film can be soo polarizing. I thought Drive was polarizing but this one sounds that much more so. I will not be seeing it but look forward to the epic arguments that it will spawn.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 6:14 pm to
there are few more pretentious shots than a slow mo/stationary shot with the focal character in the middle just sitting/standing there

i'm sure baloo will back me up there
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram