Started By
Message

re: New Transformers Movie

Posted on 2/7/11 at 9:48 am to
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 9:48 am to
quote:

And what ridiculous movies are you referring to?


Transformers 2 and 3.

quote:

If you are talking about Transformers then maybe action just isn't for you. No one in their right mind would ever say these movies were Oscar contenders or had a great story. I mean for frick's sake they are based off of an animated japanese show and a toy line about giant alien robots for crying out loud. If you dig boring emotional dramas then cool for you. When I go to movie theaters, I want to see shite I don't get to see everyday such as giant alien robots beating the shite out of each other. I don't care about a character's lifestory - I'm here for 2 - 2 and a half hours. If I want to be entertained by a long deep story with great character development, then that's what I have my television for. I watch House, True Blood, Boardwalk Empire, etc.for my character and story fixes; I go to movie theaters to see bad arse productions of stuff I don't see in my everyday life or on my tv set. Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy a comedy in the multiplex every once and awhile, and I will see a movie such as Inglorious Basterds or even Paranormal Activity, but you really aren't getting the full bang for your buck if you are going to a movie theater to see a drama that really wouldn't change your experience if you watched it at home instead.


That's a whole lot of words that miss the point - it's not even good FOR AN ACTION MOVIE.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
114115 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 9:58 am to
quote:

FYI I called u out for being an arrogant prick not for not knowing what makes a good action movie



Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34746 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 9:58 am to
I'm starting to come around on Transformers 2. that movie could have been so much better on so many levels. I'm really getting to where I don't care to watch it at all.

However, the same comments were made about Michael Bay ruining people's childhood after Transformers 1. Which wasn't Citzen Kane or anything, but it wasn't "bad" by any means. I still love the first Transformers.

Here is how I would have made Transformers better.
Keep #1 mostly the same except put more classic Decepticons in there like with the Autobots. And don't have so many cheesy Michael Bay lines in the movie. And tone down the cheese on the Sector 7 guys.

#2 Jesus, where do I start. After we ditch the ghetto bots, the femme bot and the leg humper, ditch the made up Decepticon baddie and make it Megatron's plan all along. Megatron gets revived, he tries to activate it. Jetfire (who isn't an old scottish fart) fights is out at the end with Soundwave (who shows up) and Optimus fights it out with Megatron again. And keep it to around a dozen robots on the battlefield total.

Movie would be 10 times better.

I hope this next one is better. We will still go to the theaters to watch it.
This post was edited on 2/7/11 at 10:00 am
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:04 am to
quote:

If you dig boring emotional dramas then cool for you. When I go to movie theaters, I want to see shite I don't get to see everyday such as giant alien robots beating the shite out of each other. I don't care about a character's lifestory - I'm here for 2 - 2 and a half hours. If I want to be entertained by a long deep story with great character development, then that's what I have my television for.


I was not aware that character development was against the rules in motion pictures.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:15 am to
quote:

However, the same comments were made about Michael Bay ruining people's childhood after Transformers 1. Which wasn't Citzen Kane or anything, but it wasn't "bad" by any means. I still love the first Transformers.


Transformers 1 was terrible.

Firstly, it was an unimaginable travesty that the cars all became American.

Second, the action SUCKS.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34746 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:20 am to
I understand what the guy is saying, even though I don't think he is saying it very well.

He is seperating popcorn flicks that are for pure entertainment value from movies like The Kings Speech and The Social Network. I understand what he is getting at. I won't even go to pay serious money at a theater unless it is something that woul dbe a completely different experience at a theater (i.e. and "action" movie).

I mean, how many "popcorn flciks" out there don't have plot holes, cheesy lines and get nominated for Best Picture. And before you all bring up TDK, it has its share of ridiculousness and absurdity and every time someone on this board brings that up the defense is "its a comic book movie".

I'm not really trying to hijack the thread and I've already made my feelings known about Transformers 2.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34746 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Transformers 1 was terrible.
Well, JerseyTiger has spoken. I guess that's it.

quote:

Firstly, it was an unimaginable travesty that the cars all became American.
product placement in movies isn't new.

quote:

Second, the action SUCKS.
ok.
This post was edited on 2/7/11 at 10:22 am
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48517 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I mean, how many "popcorn flciks" out there get nominated for Best Picture.


Avatar.
This post was edited on 2/7/11 at 10:27 am
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34746 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:34 am to
I wouldn't label Avatar as a popcorn flick anymore than I would label Dances With wolves a popcorn flick. But I don't argue opinions.
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
44653 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:37 am to
quote:

If you are talking about Transformers then maybe action just isn't for you. No one in their right mind would ever say these movies were Oscar contenders or had a great story. I mean for frick's sake they are based off of an animated japanese show and a toy line about giant alien robots for crying out loud. If you dig boring emotional dramas then cool for you. When I go to movie theaters, I want to see shite I don't get to see everyday such as giant alien robots beating the shite out of each other. I don't care about a character's lifestory - I'm here for 2 - 2 and a half hours. If I want to be entertained by a long deep story with great character development, then that's what I have my television for.


1. Paragraphs are your friend.

2. Just because it isn't a "boring, emotional drama" doesn't give it an excuse to lack any sort of value beyond simple entertainment. There have been hundreds of quality films that would not be categorized in the drama genre.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:39 am to
quote:

product placement in movies isn't new.


The history of product placement doesn't lessen the blow.
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
44653 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I mean, how many "popcorn flciks" out there don't have plot holes, cheesy lines and get nominated for Best Picture.


Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Lord of the Rings, E.T.
This post was edited on 2/7/11 at 10:42 am
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48517 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I wouldn't label Avatar as a popcorn flick


Special effects driven . . . check

Overused, simplified, ridiculous plot . . . check

Cookie cutter characters . . . check

Complete lack of character development . . . check

Avatar maybe the most potent example of a popcorn click . . . and a bad one at that.

Avatar is cinema's answer to the strobe light.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34746 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:43 am to
Well, now we are diverting the thread which I didn't want to do. Once again, it depends on your opinion of popcorn flick. of that list, Raiders would be the only one I would agree with. But this should be on a different thread.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48517 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Lord of the Rings, E.T.


Braveheart
Gladiator
No Country for Old Men
The Hurt Locker
The Departed
Saving Private Ryan
Pulp Fiction


That's just off the top of my head.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34746 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:51 am to
I was having more fun talking about Transformers.
This post was edited on 2/7/11 at 10:53 am
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48517 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:53 am to
quote:




The first Transformers was bad.

The second one was worse.

We're back on track.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:55 am to
quote:

How can any adult even consider watching these ridiculous movies? It isn't even mindless action. It's just plain mindless.



It really has reached absurdity.

I know Bay is a pioneer in his action filming and has made some seriously good films... but this has just reached joke status.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
151686 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 11:46 am to
quote:

How can any adult even consider watching these ridiculous movies? It isn't even mindless action. It's just plain mindless.

I'll never understand that line of thinking. I'll likely see the third TF movie in theaters, just like I saw the last two.

Sure, they're corny and stupid at times, but who cares? I sure as hell don't. And if you do care, then you can very easily avoid seeing them.

And the above quote is ridiculous. Of course it's action. Just because you (in general) may gripe about the action moving too fast or the camera being too close (which was a complaint of mine before) doesn't mean it's not action.

I also still stand by my thoguhts on TF2...everyone who saw it and thought it sucked has only themselves to blame, because you knew going into it what to expect. Sure, there were plotholes...massive ones...but those aren't the issue. There were plot holes in the first one too. The second TF movie was everything that the first one had, just amped up and overplayed (like the ghetto robots, the stupid parents, the corny jokes, etc.). My stance for this next one remains the exact same as it was for the first two...as long as lots of shite blows up and the transformers look cool, I'm happy.

And this movie will likely make 3/4 of a billion dollars (or come relatively close to that).
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34746 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 11:49 am to
quote:

CocomoLSU
YOU are what is wrong with movies today.

YOU are screwing up Hollywood for the rest of us.

If it wasn't for YOU spending 3/4 of a billion dollars on this crap then the world would be sunshine and unicorns.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram