Started By
Message

re: Movies you are never gonna see

Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:50 am to
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85004 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 10:50 am to
Black hawk Down
Zero Dark Thirty
Schindlers List
Jarhead
Casino
Willow
Lemony Snickets
Apollo 11



And there are many many more.
Posted by ZenFNmaster
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2007
2837 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:08 am to
How long have you had a substance abuse problem ?
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:11 am to
quote:

biglego


I think you're lists would be shorter if you would just post movies you have actually seen.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62651 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:27 am to
The Godfather Part Four
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85004 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:55 am to
I see a lot of movies but there are just some I have no interst in. I'm tired of gangster movies and crime dramas and I've never enjoyed war movies and drug movies depress me.

I'm a close minded sack.
Posted by TexasTiger05
Member since Aug 2007
28332 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:01 pm to
Anything that makes the most effed up movie lists on here.

Posted by Duane Dibbley
Red Dwarf
Member since Nov 2011
1783 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Movies you are never gonna see

Don't know if anyones said it yet.

I will never watch the new Jack Reacher movie, not with that frickin midget Tom Cruise as Reacher.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85004 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:34 pm to
I've seen a lot of fussing here about how Cruise is bad casting for Reacher but I've never even heard of Reacher before so people like me will probably see it and not have a gripe. But I do hate poor casting when it comes to physical attributes.
Posted by bomber77
Member since Aug 2008
14783 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

I will never watch the new Jack Reacher movie, not with that frickin midget Tom Cruise as Reacher.



Yeah, because Tom Cruise movies are never any good.

Obviously DDL or Gary Oldman should have been cast.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85004 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:47 pm to
Or Leo.

Has to be one of those three.
Posted by Duane Dibbley
Red Dwarf
Member since Nov 2011
1783 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Yeah, because Tom Cruise movies are never any good.

Has nothing to do with whether or not Tom Cruise/his movies are good or not. It might be a really good movie, BUT.
I love the Reacher novels; Jack Reacher is 6.5 250# and his size and strength are a integral part of the character.
Tom Cruise is 5.2 140#, he's not that good an actor.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 1:21 pm
Posted by RGJ18
Collierville, TN
Member since Feb 2010
9389 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Rock of Ages


Terrible, terrible movie. I cant believe I actually watched it.

And honestly I don't get all the hate for the twilight series. It's not THAT bad of a story, I just think it has a bad perception. I saw the last one the other night and I thought it had a pretty good ending after a terrible start where I had plenty of "wtf" faces.

Go ahead, say I have the ghey. Whatever
Posted by Chris_topher
Member since Sep 2012
8187 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

1) Ted

quote:

Actually not a bad movie.

I can't get past thinking of it as Marky Mark meets Alf.
Plus, I've never watched a Mark Walhberg movie that didn't suck... and The Departed does not count as a Mark Wahlberg movie.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram