Started By
Message

re: Making a Murderer - Part 2

Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:26 pm to
Everything on that list has been addressed by the creators at some point. We can get into it all if you really want, but most of that either wasn't as relevant as something else, or it was something that Kratz completely pulled out of his arse.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Maybe but it shows where the documentary didn't paint the whole picture.





No it doesn't. It shows that they decided against including shite that was just made up. Like he said, most of those were simply debunked. Why would something proven to be a lie have been included?
This post was edited on 10/19/18 at 3:36 pm
Posted by hogcard1964
Illinois
Member since Jan 2017
10468 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:37 pm to
There's really nothing new coming forth on the case. Sure there's appeals ongoing, some additional interviews, a new psychologist and a new team of lawyers. However, this 2nd series is more about the original audiences fixation with the first series.

Ftr, I personally know someone (an attorney) that was farmed out by the defense to do some additional work on the original trial.

They were both guilty as he)).
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

They were both guilty as he)).



Both of them? What connects Dassey?

Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35528 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Avery called Halbach's cell phone three times, twice using the Star-67 feature to hide his identity


These are all talking points your getting from the prosecution as their theory.

As it's pure speculation. And if someone tried to testify that Avery used star69 to hide his identity it would objected to and sustained as conclusion.

And the rest of your long list aren't really relevant facts but a lot was probably used in the trial to show a pervert or bad guy even though that's immaterial to the crime.

You can't use immoral character or past deeds to convict someone.

So he had porn? How the frick is that relevant but to taint the minds of the jury?

Look at him, look at the porn guy, he had porn, he must've done it, look at the bad guy.

All the great stuff proving guilt people have claimed was left out of the doc has been greatly exaggerated.
This post was edited on 10/19/18 at 4:08 pm
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13300 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Maybe but it shows where the documentary didn't paint the whole picture.


Half of that shite was in the first season. What are you talking about?
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13300 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Damn....if that makes a murderer......most of the poster here are likely killers.



Damn...I looked at a WYHI thread the other day. Really makes you think....

Could been me.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Half of that shite was in the first season. What are you talking about?



No
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 6:31 pm to
Yes.

Do we need to go through your list item by item and pull that garbage apart?
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18315 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 7:39 pm to
Are you dumb or are you stupid? Serious questions need answers
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 7:42 pm to
I've watched the first 3 episodes. I'm enjoying it so far. I dont remember all the details from Part 1 and dont really have a strong opinion on whether or not he did it. I do have a strong opinion that the methods and conduct of law enforcement and the prosecution was pretty fubar though.

Anyway, just saying 3 episodes in, it has been worth watching.
Posted by Ibleedblackandgold
Back in Louisiana where I belong
Member since Jun 2009
2738 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

5. Pornography was recovered in Avery's residence


quote:

Damn....if that makes a murderer......most of the poster here are likely killers.


I guess 99.9% of us are serial killers.
This post was edited on 10/19/18 at 9:17 pm
Posted by Rou Leed
Member since Jun 2015
1796 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 10:34 pm to
You getting out today

Yeah

Yeah

You didnt get out?

No

Yeah

Sums up season 2.
This post was edited on 10/19/18 at 10:40 pm
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 11:34 pm to
If that’s the best of the “earth shattering evidence” that was omitted from season 1, then Steven Avery should be released immediately.
Posted by Rou Leed
Member since Jun 2015
1796 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 11:59 pm to
the lady is the best netflix lawyer I have seen. Strong netflix case was made for defense again. Netfix lawyering is a lucrative business.
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 12:01 am
Posted by lsuwontonwrap
Member since Aug 2012
34147 posts
Posted on 10/20/18 at 12:03 am to
I'm on episode 3. Steven's lawyers really screwed the pooch the first time around, huh? This new lawyer is a bad bitch.

Spoilers:

The brain scan thing was a TRIP!

LOL at Brendan not buying ice cream because he didn't want to be out 5 bucks if he got out.
Posted by Rou Leed
Member since Jun 2015
1796 posts
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:07 am to
The lady lost on everything she tried to do in court, but completely dominated on netflix and never lost a netflix motion. In reality she got stomped out very badly.
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:09 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Rou Leed
quote:

netflix


Ok, we get it.

Calm down.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 10/20/18 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Are you dumb or are you stupid? Serious questions need answers



I guess I'm as dumb as the court of appeals judges who've upheld the verdict.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71818 posts
Posted on 10/20/18 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

I guess I'm as dumb as the court of appeals judges who've upheld the verdict.


Do you have a clue what those judges are looking at when they make these rulings?

I guess no.

It should also be noted that Dassey was ordered released before it was blocked, so that's a bit awkward for you.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram