Started By
Message

re: LOST "What They Died For" S6.E16 (Multi-centric)

Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

I think you have your dates mixed up. 2004 is the island timeline, and 2007 is the alternate timeline.


Nope you have it backwards. Here's the link: LOST timelines
After the the incident, when Juliet might or might not have detonated the H-bomb core in 1977, two things happened:
1. The Losties in the area of the detonation were flashed forward back to 2007 in the original island timeline.
2. The flash sideways timeline was created with our heroes landing safely on Oceanic flight 815 in Los Angeles in 2004.
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14831 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

That was before Jacob was killed.



dote, misread that. I thought he was just talking about after he became fLocke.
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14831 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:17 pm to
quote:


No, he is right. 815 crashed in 2004 and 3 years have passed so it is 2007 on the Island.

815 "didn't" crash in 2004 in the alternate timeline and only weeks have passed.



damn, 0-2 today. better take me outta the game, coach!
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Honestly, do you believe what you typed though?



Yes, overall recognizing the flaws that myself and others have pointed out. Many agree: TV.com Reviews The lack of continuity in the plot that you often cite is irrespective of innovations that have been introduced in the programming. It remains one of the most unique and creative series to date despite your obvious qualms with the writing which I agree with to some extent but not enough to completely denounce the series as you have.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41083 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:29 pm to
Does he denounce the series?

I see him questioning the people that spout nonsense like Lost was handed down on high after being inscribed on tablets by a fiery bush.

He tends to go after the Lostiacs and their dogma. I don't see him hating on the show. Criticism is not hatred.

We just happen to have fun prodding some of you moonbats with a stick.

And we also like to bring up real continuity issues.

Once again that is not hatred of the show. I love the show. I imagine there is a good chance I will hate the ending as I did with BSG which Freaux liked. See sometimes he can be wrong.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
107387 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

We just happen to have fun prodding some of you moonbats with a stick.



Toothpick warning.




eta: and I agree the ending to BSG was a little underwhelming, though that in no way takes away from the awesomeness of the show.
This post was edited on 5/20/10 at 3:37 pm
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41083 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Toothpick warning.




I agree. Just because the ending was not great, that doesn't ruin the great ride.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
107387 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

I agree. Just because the ending was not great, that doesn't ruin the great ride.



Something I hope people keep in mind for this show. While I fully expect the ending to be great some people will inevitably find a way to be pissed off.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41083 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:52 pm to
Well, you are probably looking at one of those people.

We shall see. I imagine there is a good chance I will be more entertained by the finale thread than the finale.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

He changed his form when appearing to Ben as Alex. Maybe other times too.



Jacob was alive when he took on Alex's form.
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14831 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:17 pm to
I had some serious reading comp issues today. Like WTF moments that scare the shite outta you.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38457 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Yes, overall recognizing the flaws that myself and others have pointed out. Many agree: TV.com Reviews The lack of continuity in the plot that you often cite is irrespective of innovations that have been introduced in the programming. It remains one of the most unique and creative series to date despite your obvious qualms with the writing which I agree with to some extent but not enough to completely denounce the series as you have.


Ok so let's take this point by point then:

quote:

1. The series has basically been a combination of soap opera, sci-fi, mystery, drama, romance, comedy, history and fantasy. No series has ever combined so many elements the way LOST has.


Just because a show has a couple of jokes every now and again, doesn't make it a "comedy." Just because a show has a "romance" plot, doesn't make the show "romance." These are all genres, calling out something as an element of the show, doesn't make said show the genre of that. Just because Marlon Wayans is funny in Requiem for a Dream, doesn't mean that RfaD "effectively combines harrowing realism with hilarious comedy." This point is a ridiculous extrapolation of minor elements that MOST stories have.

And how is the show "history?" Get this: Lost isn't real.

quote:

2. The termination of well developed characters throughout the series was unique and will likely be repeated in other series as a popular convention.


You mean the complete and pointless execution of 5 characters over the last 3 episodes just so they don't have to wrap up their stories is innovative? You're acting like no show has ever killed anyone before? Are you kidding me?

"This Just In: Lost is the first show in history to kill a character!"

quote:

3. Probably the greatest use of the internet to enhance fan interaction related to the series. This will also set an ongoing trend by networks to increase fan support.


Lost didn't "use" the internet, fans did. Lost used viral marketing, which isn't a new concept, as was done before. It wasn't the first show to tie in other media either. Star Trek did that too. Batman: TAS did that. The list goes on and on.

And Twin Peaks had less to work with and achieved more. Rather than make 40 page threads on a forum fans traded video tapes THROUGH THE MAIL. That's innovative and crazy. Posting in a forum is not.

quote:

4. The use of time travel, backward and forward and sideways with the parallel 2004 timeline was a significant innovation along with timely use of flashbacks and flashforwards.


"Hey Screw You Sliders, Quantum Leap, Twilight Zone, Outer Limits, Star Trek, Star Trek Deep Space 9, Star Trek: TNG, Star Trek Voyager, Star Trek: Enterprise, Andromeda, Farscape, Dr. Who, Babylon 5, Charmed, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Futurama, Red Dwarf, Stargate SG-1, The X-Files, Lost in Space, Farscape, Gargoyles, and Early Edition, LOST IS THE FIRST SHOW TO EVER USE TIME TRAVEL."

"Oh Yeah, and screw you Shakespeare, Hawthorne, Twain, Melville, Fowles, Dostoevsky, and Joyce. Lost was also the first property ever to use flashbacks. It's so innovative!"

quote:

5. The introduction of so many historic, mythic and scientific references and easter eggs was creative and added to the mystery and enjoyment for fans looking for answers.


You mean throwing a whole bunch of random references into a 5 year long show, 90% of which were only red herrings so fans would constantly read deeper meanings into things that didn't matter?? That's not creativity, that's trickery and manipulation.

Oh and two words: The Matrix

quote:

6. The development of basic themes such as balance, light/dark, science/faith, choice/destiny, love/hate, etc. created a larger than life atmosphere in the world that is LOST.


Yes, because we are all more enlightened. Thankfully Lost is the first show ever to talk about good and evil. WHAT NEW AND INTERESTING CONCEPTS?!? Science and Faith, yeah let's forget the entirety of the science fiction genre. That works.

You mean Lost was the first thing ever to talk about mankind's biggest questions?

"Hey Plato, Damon Lindelhof is way smarter than you. He talks about choice and destiny. You know free will. You never talked about that....ever."

quote:

7. A fine balance between super-human (Smokey) and unique abilities (talking with the dead) tempered by rules made for a unique plot.


Wait I change my mind, apparently Lost CREATED the science fiction genre now I get it. Actually we are in a wormhole, apparently Lost was created first, and all comic books are following what Lost set forth too.

quote:

8. The backgammon-like game aspect of the plot with rules that were only partially understood by the audience was very creative.


So wait, let me get this straight: Lost was inventive because fans only "partially" understood the rules? Honestly....like really? Step back from the computer and think about that for a second.

quote:

9. An announced deadline for the end of the series was unique and will probably be used in other future programming. This gives actors and everyone associated with the series more flexibility in planning.


Hey buddy, Battlestar Galactica ended a year ago. British Television and Anime have been doing this for like 30 years. They actually plan it out from the start to have an end.

Oh, I get it now, Lost is innovative BECAUSE it set that end date AFTER the show started. Now it makes tons of sense.

quote:

10. Reintroducing apparently terminated actors (like Claire) was quite innovative and was enabled by other conventions in the series such as Anna Lucia's appearance in the flash sideways timeline.


You mean Lost was the first show to not clearly "kill" a character only to have them reappear later??? You mean Lost basically pulled what all horror directors pull in almost every horror movie?
This post was edited on 5/20/10 at 4:29 pm
Posted by White Shadeaux
In the nicest parts of hell
Member since Jan 2006
24114 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:29 pm to
Wow. You must be even more bored than I.




ETA:
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The termination of well developed characters throughout the series was unique and will likely be repeated in other series as a popular convention.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You mean the complete and pointless execution of 5 characters over the last 3 episodes just so they don't have to wrap up their stories is innovative? You're acting like no show has ever killed anyone before? Are you kidding me?

"This Just In: Lost is the first show in history to kill a character!"


To bolster your argument here, I offer Exhibit A, the TV series "Platoon".
This post was edited on 5/20/10 at 4:35 pm
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41083 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

You mean Lost was the first show to not clearly "kill" a character only to have them reappear later??? You mean Lost basically pulled what all horror directors pull in almost every horror movie?



Fantastic rebuttal up to that point. Should have tossed out that Soap Operas have been doing that since the inception of soap operas.
Posted by The Boob
Member since Mar 2010
773 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:35 pm to
davedawgs, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41083 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:39 pm to
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Does he denounce the series?


Yes, he does. An objective evaluation includes both positives and negatives. I have not seen Freauxzen provide many if any positive perspectives of LOST. He does admit that LOST is better than 90% of the crap on TV but then that is certainly qualified "praise." :)

quote:

I don't see him hating on the show. Criticism is not hatred.


Oh, I don't see his criticism as hate and surely criticism is not equated with hate though it can be done in a hateful manner.
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14831 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 4:46 pm to
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38457 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Yes, he does.


No I don't. Not once have I said the show as a whole is bad. I have said it doesn't make sense, it cheats viewers, it throws red herrings out there, etc.

Most of the time I come in the arguments to say the show is "Not the Greatest of all time" or not "Intelligent." I said a few pages back, that's what gets me about Lost fans. I never come in to say "Lost sucks."

quote:

An objective evaluation includes both positives and negatives. I have not seen Freauxzen provide many if any positive perspectives of LOST.


I have said time and time again that I love Desmond, Sawyer, Ecko, Locke (not Flocke), Miles as characters. I am even one of the VERY FEW who thinks that Michael was a great character for the show, and the show is weaker without him.

I also say that the production value, set design, cinematography, most of the acting etc. are all well done. Check all of my posts, I never denounce any of that.

Hey, I think Michael Emerson's portrayal of Ben is great. He gives an inspired and nuanced performance. The problem is: his character does not work. He doesn't belong in the story no matter how much the fans and writers want him there. All of the unnatural reactions to Ben's character are because he is forced into the story where he doesn't belong.

Everything outside the story/plot, writing and "myth" of the show is pretty good.
This post was edited on 5/20/10 at 5:24 pm
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 5/20/10 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

davedawgs, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.


Yes, we are all impressed with your timely usage of the scene from "Billy Madison." I assume this is meant to be a joke since you did not take the time to debate my points, otherwise, "may God have mercy on your soul" for being a complete moron.
This post was edited on 5/20/10 at 11:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 42 of 43Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram