Started By
Message

re: Jurassic Park: Greatest fantastical movie for boys

Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:42 am to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:42 am to
And the greatest animatronic in the history of motion pictures
Posted by TigerattheU
Member since Aug 2006
3495 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:44 am to
This week I read Jurassic Park and I'm halfway through The Lost World. I really enjoyed comparing the characters in the novel to the movie.

[Spoilers from 1993 and the novel]



Hammond has humanizing, grandfatherly moments in the movie, but in the novel he is wilfully blind to the failure of his park throughout. To the point that you doubt he believes what he is saying anymore. He is alone on a hill at the end when he is eaten by scavenger dinosaurs.

Ian Malcolm's speaking cadence, the "...ah...", and brainy speeches were carried over exactly into the movie, but in the novel he isn't a hound dog. He actually did the water drop test on a guy in the control room. I pictured him more like Malcolm Gladwell.

The lawyer Gennaro is alive until the end of the book and not wimpy. He is out of his element and has different priorities but is generally helpful. Although at the end when they go into the raptors nest, there is a conflict between him and Dr. Grant that is more reminiscent of the film. A different character abandons the kids when the T-Rex gets loose.

Dr. Grant likes kids in the novel. The boy, Tim, is the older sibling, and along with the dinosaur knowledge, he is the good one with computers. The girl, Lex, is young and useless. She is like a precious burden they have to protect.

Dr. Sattler wasn't a major character in the novel. Her heroic act was being used as a distraction/bait for the raptors once. She spent a lot of time tending to an injured Malcolm and listening to him.

Wu the InGen geneticist is a lot more fleshed out in the novel. John Arnold in the control room is a major character, inbetween cigarettes. Nedry (Newman) is the same gifted slob, but his personality seemed meeker in the novel. More like the quiet guy in the office that you regretted screwing over. Muldoon the game warden seemed to be the most consistent with the movie.

There's a lot of plot differences, but I have to point out that the park vehicles were Land Cruisers, but by The Lost World they are the Explorers you'd expect.



Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32737 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:48 am to
quote:

. Nedry (Newman) is the same gifted slob, but his personality seemed meeker in the novel.


The novel also went much more into how Nedry was getting financially shafted by InGen when the park was first having technical problems. Basically, Hammond wanted him to do more work outside his contract for the same amount of pay.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Wu the InGen geneticist is a lot more fleshed out in the novel.


Is that him in the new Jurassic Park trailer?
Posted by TigerattheU
Member since Aug 2006
3495 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:59 am to
It looked like him, but I don't know. I barely remember what happens in The Lost World and I never saw the third one.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:03 am to
Also, this film had some of the best branding/merch ideas since Star Wars, and prior to Star Wars.

Maybe Ninja Turtles was the closest too.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95669 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:14 am to
Meh.

Raiders of the Lost Ark or Star Wars would be my pic for your thread title. But what do I know, I'm old?
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61479 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:21 am to
quote:

I am currently showing it to one of my science classes.

quote:


the vast majority of them have never seen it.


frick that makes me feel old
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:23 am to

no doubt they're better, and star wars has a more immediate impact, but Jurassic park isn't too far off in terms of being a great film and its impact on cinema (bigger impact than raiders for sure, but raiders and star wars are the better movies)

Of the 3 I think JP was the most thought provoking and socially relevant (dolly was cloned 2 years later, and there were alot of discussions about can we, should we, etc.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schindler's list fo sho

Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
30451 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:28 am to
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:28 am to
Popcorn flick?


Fast and the Furious is a popcorn flick, National Treasure is a popcorn flick. Jurassic Park is a classic, and has as high of a replay value as any
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:30 am to
They did that scene by plucking a guitar string underneath causing just the right amount of vibration
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38443 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:40 am to
I need to re-read Crichton. I read most of his books in the 90's and then never went back to them.

Andromeda Strain was so good as a film. A shame that Timeline didn't translate as well. I love that book.

Congo takes too much from the Tarzan novels (book and film).
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60100 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:46 am to
It's not as great as any of the Marvel films, but still a very fun, solid movie.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38443 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:51 am to
quote:

It's not as great as any of the Marvel films,


Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:01 am to


yeah, joss whedon is a modern day FFC with speilbergian flair

Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:03 am to
popcorn flicks are some of the best films ever made

star wars and empire
raiders
Jurassic park
and on and on

all movies should aspire to be popcorn flicks, that implies some level of imagination and adventure. I like straight drama, but I'm not going to shell out and go to the movies to watch fat fricking Philip Seymour Hoffman do his best Truman capote impression
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
51733 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:14 am to
Yup and it looks like he was the one who created the I-Rex. Hoping he has a bigger role then he did in the first
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:17 am to
I guess I have a different thought as to what I consider popcorn flicks.

Like that typical summer action flick, doesn't involve much thought, lots of special effects/action. JP, Star Wars etc are much than popcorn flicks to me.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:24 am to
to me, popcorn flick has an implied value of adventure, excitement and imagination...maybe some action and/or romance. Even a dash of horror.

Jurassic park fits this bill perfectly. Transformers, avengers, MoS, or whatever the big summer release does not really do that in 2015.

Jurassic park isn't bloated and super sized, it's perfect in scope. it's thought provoking, it has images that feed you information even if you don't know it or jeff goldblum ruins it by telling you what it is ("king kong?")


first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram