- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:44 am to magildachunks
This week I read Jurassic Park and I'm halfway through The Lost World. I really enjoyed comparing the characters in the novel to the movie.
[Spoilers from 1993 and the novel]
Hammond has humanizing, grandfatherly moments in the movie, but in the novel he is wilfully blind to the failure of his park throughout. To the point that you doubt he believes what he is saying anymore. He is alone on a hill at the end when he is eaten by scavenger dinosaurs.
Ian Malcolm's speaking cadence, the "...ah...", and brainy speeches were carried over exactly into the movie, but in the novel he isn't a hound dog. He actually did the water drop test on a guy in the control room. I pictured him more like Malcolm Gladwell.
The lawyer Gennaro is alive until the end of the book and not wimpy. He is out of his element and has different priorities but is generally helpful. Although at the end when they go into the raptors nest, there is a conflict between him and Dr. Grant that is more reminiscent of the film. A different character abandons the kids when the T-Rex gets loose.
Dr. Grant likes kids in the novel. The boy, Tim, is the older sibling, and along with the dinosaur knowledge, he is the good one with computers. The girl, Lex, is young and useless. She is like a precious burden they have to protect.
Dr. Sattler wasn't a major character in the novel. Her heroic act was being used as a distraction/bait for the raptors once. She spent a lot of time tending to an injured Malcolm and listening to him.
Wu the InGen geneticist is a lot more fleshed out in the novel. John Arnold in the control room is a major character, inbetween cigarettes. Nedry (Newman) is the same gifted slob, but his personality seemed meeker in the novel. More like the quiet guy in the office that you regretted screwing over. Muldoon the game warden seemed to be the most consistent with the movie.
There's a lot of plot differences, but I have to point out that the park vehicles were Land Cruisers, but by The Lost World they are the Explorers you'd expect.
[Spoilers from 1993 and the novel]
Hammond has humanizing, grandfatherly moments in the movie, but in the novel he is wilfully blind to the failure of his park throughout. To the point that you doubt he believes what he is saying anymore. He is alone on a hill at the end when he is eaten by scavenger dinosaurs.
Ian Malcolm's speaking cadence, the "...ah...", and brainy speeches were carried over exactly into the movie, but in the novel he isn't a hound dog. He actually did the water drop test on a guy in the control room. I pictured him more like Malcolm Gladwell.
The lawyer Gennaro is alive until the end of the book and not wimpy. He is out of his element and has different priorities but is generally helpful. Although at the end when they go into the raptors nest, there is a conflict between him and Dr. Grant that is more reminiscent of the film. A different character abandons the kids when the T-Rex gets loose.
Dr. Grant likes kids in the novel. The boy, Tim, is the older sibling, and along with the dinosaur knowledge, he is the good one with computers. The girl, Lex, is young and useless. She is like a precious burden they have to protect.
Dr. Sattler wasn't a major character in the novel. Her heroic act was being used as a distraction/bait for the raptors once. She spent a lot of time tending to an injured Malcolm and listening to him.
Wu the InGen geneticist is a lot more fleshed out in the novel. John Arnold in the control room is a major character, inbetween cigarettes. Nedry (Newman) is the same gifted slob, but his personality seemed meeker in the novel. More like the quiet guy in the office that you regretted screwing over. Muldoon the game warden seemed to be the most consistent with the movie.
There's a lot of plot differences, but I have to point out that the park vehicles were Land Cruisers, but by The Lost World they are the Explorers you'd expect.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:48 am to TigerattheU
quote:
. Nedry (Newman) is the same gifted slob, but his personality seemed meeker in the novel.
The novel also went much more into how Nedry was getting financially shafted by InGen when the park was first having technical problems. Basically, Hammond wanted him to do more work outside his contract for the same amount of pay.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:50 am to TigerattheU
quote:
Wu the InGen geneticist is a lot more fleshed out in the novel.
Is that him in the new Jurassic Park trailer?
Posted on 5/6/15 at 8:59 am to Pectus
It looked like him, but I don't know. I barely remember what happens in The Lost World and I never saw the third one.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:03 am to TigerattheU
Also, this film had some of the best branding/merch ideas since Star Wars, and prior to Star Wars.
Maybe Ninja Turtles was the closest too.
Maybe Ninja Turtles was the closest too.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:14 am to magildachunks
Meh.
Raiders of the Lost Ark or Star Wars would be my pic for your thread title. But what do I know, I'm old?
Raiders of the Lost Ark or Star Wars would be my pic for your thread title. But what do I know, I'm old?
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:21 am to bigpetedatiga
quote:
I am currently showing it to one of my science classes.
quote:
the vast majority of them have never seen it.
frick that makes me feel old
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:23 am to Ace Midnight
no doubt they're better, and star wars has a more immediate impact, but Jurassic park isn't too far off in terms of being a great film and its impact on cinema (bigger impact than raiders for sure, but raiders and star wars are the better movies)
Of the 3 I think JP was the most thought provoking and socially relevant (dolly was cloned 2 years later, and there were alot of discussions about can we, should we, etc.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schindler's list fo sho
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:28 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:28 am to Bench McElroy
Popcorn flick?
Fast and the Furious is a popcorn flick, National Treasure is a popcorn flick. Jurassic Park is a classic, and has as high of a replay value as any
Fast and the Furious is a popcorn flick, National Treasure is a popcorn flick. Jurassic Park is a classic, and has as high of a replay value as any
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:30 am to Wally Sparks
They did that scene by plucking a guitar string underneath causing just the right amount of vibration
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:40 am to CocoLoco
I need to re-read Crichton. I read most of his books in the 90's and then never went back to them.
Andromeda Strain was so good as a film. A shame that Timeline didn't translate as well. I love that book.
Congo takes too much from the Tarzan novels (book and film).
Andromeda Strain was so good as a film. A shame that Timeline didn't translate as well. I love that book.
Congo takes too much from the Tarzan novels (book and film).
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:46 am to magildachunks
It's not as great as any of the Marvel films, but still a very fun, solid movie.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 9:51 am to RLDSC FAN
quote:
It's not as great as any of the Marvel films,
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:01 am to RLDSC FAN
yeah, joss whedon is a modern day FFC with speilbergian flair
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:03 am to CocoLoco
popcorn flicks are some of the best films ever made
star wars and empire
raiders
Jurassic park
and on and on
all movies should aspire to be popcorn flicks, that implies some level of imagination and adventure. I like straight drama, but I'm not going to shell out and go to the movies to watch fat fricking Philip Seymour Hoffman do his best Truman capote impression
star wars and empire
raiders
Jurassic park
and on and on
all movies should aspire to be popcorn flicks, that implies some level of imagination and adventure. I like straight drama, but I'm not going to shell out and go to the movies to watch fat fricking Philip Seymour Hoffman do his best Truman capote impression
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:14 am to Pectus
Yup and it looks like he was the one who created the I-Rex. Hoping he has a bigger role then he did in the first
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:17 am to DelU249
I guess I have a different thought as to what I consider popcorn flicks.
Like that typical summer action flick, doesn't involve much thought, lots of special effects/action. JP, Star Wars etc are much than popcorn flicks to me.
Like that typical summer action flick, doesn't involve much thought, lots of special effects/action. JP, Star Wars etc are much than popcorn flicks to me.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 10:24 am to CocoLoco
to me, popcorn flick has an implied value of adventure, excitement and imagination...maybe some action and/or romance. Even a dash of horror.
Jurassic park fits this bill perfectly. Transformers, avengers, MoS, or whatever the big summer release does not really do that in 2015.
Jurassic park isn't bloated and super sized, it's perfect in scope. it's thought provoking, it has images that feed you information even if you don't know it or jeff goldblum ruins it by telling you what it is ("king kong?")
Jurassic park fits this bill perfectly. Transformers, avengers, MoS, or whatever the big summer release does not really do that in 2015.
Jurassic park isn't bloated and super sized, it's perfect in scope. it's thought provoking, it has images that feed you information even if you don't know it or jeff goldblum ruins it by telling you what it is ("king kong?")
Popular
Back to top


0






