- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I hate Jurassic Park 3, and 2 is dumb as well!
Posted on 6/13/15 at 11:20 pm to tWildcat
Posted on 6/13/15 at 11:20 pm to tWildcat
So basically the Raptors sneak on the boat, start killing the crew, the TRex somehow gets loose and starts killing crew (and Raptors?), locks itself in the cargo hold, and somehow the boat crashes into the dock with the TRex being the only living thing on the boat.
1
Posted on 6/13/15 at 11:32 pm to boXerrumble
Initially, it was probably supposed to have raptors and rex in San Diego. The raptors kill the boat crew and the rex escapes when they get to San Diego. Raptors and rex destroy and kill.
What they gave us was a magic, sneaky rex that escapes, kills the crew without damaging anything, and then locking himself back into the hold.
What they gave us was a magic, sneaky rex that escapes, kills the crew without damaging anything, and then locking himself back into the hold.
Posted on 6/13/15 at 11:38 pm to Scruffy
I guess they weren't comfortable with more raptor and T-rex mayhem/eat each other since that ended the original.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 12:14 am to saintsfan22
But there would have been so much insane carnage! 
Could you imagine a pack of raptors AND a T-Rex in a major metropolitan area? Not sure the local police would be able to control them that well.
Could you imagine a pack of raptors AND a T-Rex in a major metropolitan area? Not sure the local police would be able to control them that well.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 12:23 am to lsufan9193969700
Roland was the best thing about 2
Posted on 6/14/15 at 1:07 am to lsufan9193969700
The 2nd book was by far my favorite.
Posted on 6/16/15 at 10:20 am to Scruffy
lost world was good, JP III sucked. maybe shouldve used different dinos
Posted on 6/16/15 at 11:13 am to Boo Krewe
JP 3 was better than 2
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:08 pm to lsufan9193969700
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:10 pm to tigerclaws15
quote:
JP 3 was better than 2
Dude no.
JP3 was the biggest pile of shite imaginable.
At least the Lost World had some darkness to it. The initial Island scenes were pretty badass with the RV going over the cliff, the scene in the field and the search party etc.
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:13 pm to STLhog
Also what is the deal with Ian Malcolm being like 100% a completely different character between 1 and 2?
He was completely badass in 1 and totally sucked arse in number 2. I realize the experience would make him weary but does anyone else agree? It was ridiculous.
I read the books a long time ago but pretty sure Malcolm died in the original of gangreen in the original. Maybe thats why?
He was completely badass in 1 and totally sucked arse in number 2. I realize the experience would make him weary but does anyone else agree? It was ridiculous.
I read the books a long time ago but pretty sure Malcolm died in the original of gangreen in the original. Maybe thats why?
This post was edited on 6/16/15 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:27 pm to STLhog
Well yeah... Chrichton wasn't even gonna write a 2nd book to begin with until he was pressured to because of the success of the first movie.
Malcolm died in the first book because of his injuries and Hammond was killed by compys after breaking his ankle (I think, unless he broke his leg completely).
Malcolm in the 2nd book is noticeably more serious and pessimistic (not that he wasn't already pessimistic to begin with).
Malcolm died in the first book because of his injuries and Hammond was killed by compys after breaking his ankle (I think, unless he broke his leg completely).
Malcolm in the 2nd book is noticeably more serious and pessimistic (not that he wasn't already pessimistic to begin with).
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:31 pm to Scruffy
quote:
The black daughter was dumb and her gymnastics raptor kick is fricking retarded.
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:34 pm to Green Chili Tiger
i hate you for posting that gif.
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:36 pm to Thracken13
quote:
i hate you for posting that gif.
Always reminds me of this cheesy 80's movie:
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:38 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
The Lost World took a wild turn from the plot in the book. I don't think the San Diego thing was even supposed to happen.
It wasn't.
I never understood why they basically forced MC to write a book sequel and then promptly disregarded massive chunks of it while including major changes that really didn't make sense.
quote:
Malcolm died in the first book because of his injuries and Hammond was killed by compys after breaking his ankle (I think, unless he broke his leg completely).
yea, I think the 2nd book opens with Malcom saying something about how he had died on the operating table but was resuscitated.
I also really disliked that SS changed the lawyer in JP1 into a total sleaze ball from the bad arse that damn near saves everybody just so he could get some cheap lawyer jokes in there. It was also lame that he had Hammond live instead of being killed by his own creations. Instead of Hammond paying for his mistakes (which he claims people should have to do) we got a the typically schmaltzy Spielberg sentimentality.
Even as a 12 year old kid I was like "WTF? Y U wreck the point of the character?"
This post was edited on 6/16/15 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:44 pm to Dr RC
I get the San Diego arc, it was bound to happen at some point, but it was seriously poorly done.
An embryo making it to a rogue scientist's lab would be much more plausible than that boat nonsense.
An embryo making it to a rogue scientist's lab would be much more plausible than that boat nonsense.
Posted on 6/16/15 at 12:46 pm to Dr RC
quote:
I also really disliked that SS changed the lawyer in JP1 into a total sleaze ball from the bad arse that damn near saves everybody just so he could get some cheap lawyer jokes in there. It was also lame that he had Hammond live instead of being killed by his own creations. Instead of Hammond paying for his mistakes (which he claims people should have to do) we got a the typically schmaltzy Spielberg sentimentality.
Even as a 12 year old kid I was like "WTF? Y U wreck the point of the character?"
Yeah book John Hammond and movie John Hammond were way different.
Goldbloom was actually cool in the first one. They just made him a lame skeptical dad in the second one. It was pretty depressing.
Posted on 6/16/15 at 1:11 pm to STLhog
Didn't LW the book have 2 kids instead of 1 in the movie? Also, I may be mistaken, but neither of the 2 kids were Malcolm's at all.
Good lord, the more I think about it, they completely destroyed the Book plot in the movie.
Good lord, the more I think about it, they completely destroyed the Book plot in the movie.
Posted on 6/16/15 at 1:14 pm to STLhog
quote:
An embryo making it to a rogue scientist's lab would be much more plausible than that boat nonsense.
Which could be the plot for a Jurassic World sequel with Wu's embryos in an Ingen Lab, on the US mainland.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News