Started By
Message

re: Did anyone else not like Inception?

Posted on 7/18/10 at 11:33 am to
Posted by JinFL
Duuuval
Member since Oct 2004
4325 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 11:33 am to
I fell asleep :(. Need to see it again I guess when I'm more awake. The people we were with were getting restless as well.
Posted by Volumnia
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
1038 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 12:39 pm to
I loved it, but I think we all know how it feels to hate something everyone else raves about. Luckily, I didn't feel that at all with this one. It's nice to not be disappointed in a movie for a change.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86410 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

All of these people that hate or dislike this movie what are yalls favorite movies?
In no particular order,

The Matrix
Star Wars
Silence of the lambs
Dune
Jeremiah Johnson
Raising Arizona
Princess Bride
No Country for....
Brubaker
Shawshank
The Thirteenth Floor(sooooo much better than Inception)
Bourne Identity
Jaws
It's a Wonderful Life
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67435 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 6:32 pm to
I was disappointed. Incredibly well crafted from a technical sstandpoint. Visually impressive. A nice germ of an idea. And some good scenes.

NOW . . . way too many bullshite . . . yes, bullshite . . . layers and twists merely to explain a means to get where Nolan wanted to go. And where was that? That's what's disappointing. Not much of anywhere. In the end, it was almost vacuous. Wait, that's probably too harsh. It just didn't hold my interest as I had hoped.

Too each his own. Can't say it was a horrible movie or anything like that. I wanted more.
Posted by DanglingFury
Living the dream
Member since Dec 2007
20466 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

Too each his own.


But I think your post is bullshite, yes bullshite.
This post was edited on 7/18/10 at 6:41 pm
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10675 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

NOW . . . way too many bullshite . . . yes, bullshite . . . layers and twists merely to explain a means to get where Nolan wanted to go. And where was that?


Ask yourself - do you understand why they had to go 3 layers deep? Do you understand why they were doing this at all?
Posted by tigerguy121
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
10695 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Ask yourself - do you understand why they had to go 3 layers deep? Do you understand why they were doing this at all?


To plant inception, but it's inception is not real having to go 3 layers deep is only bc Nolan wants to have twists and such. Could have made the movie without all of that.

I don't agree with the poster but i understand why some would not enjoy that style of film.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67435 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Ask yourself - do you understand why they had to go 3 layers deep? Do you understand why they were doing this at all?




Uhhh, yeah. I get it. Completely understood it. Still call bullshite.

And by what I mean by where Nolan wanted to go is what, in the end, was he trying to say with the movie. Nothing with that much pretentiousness can try to say it was just action and science fiction or escapism. He clearly thought he was going to say something profound.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67435 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

only bc Nolan wants to have twists and such. Could have made the movie without all of that.


pretty much. i can't believe people actually get into serious discussions about what ended up on film.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67435 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

But I think your post is bullshite, yes bullshite.


Did you do well with Dungeons and Dragons? How many times have your read The Hobbitt and Lord of the Rings?


































Posted by Dead Mike
Cell Block 4
Member since Mar 2010
3932 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 7:43 pm to
quote:


And by what I mean by where Nolan wanted to go is what, in the end, was he trying to say with the movie. Nothing with that much pretentiousness can try to say it was just action and science fiction or escapism. He clearly thought he was going to say something profound.



Why? People often ascribe this sort of thing to filmmakers. Sometimes it's probably true; Avatar, for example, involves clear environmentalism advocacy. A lot of the time, there's probably nothing being "said", as though there is some sort of message.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28314 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 7:54 pm to
I saw it today. Decent movie, but it certainly will not be falling in my Top10 of all time. Given my fascination with dreams, along with my fascination of movies that make you "think," I really thought I would love this movie. However, I did not.

It was entertaining, and I definitely recommend it, I just came away a tad disappointed. I thought the movie was too "jumpy" and never really had a cohesiveness to it. While it certainly is a movie that makes you think, which I love, the pace of it never gave you time to actually think and process those thoughts. I think that's the main problem I had with it... right about the time you are just starting to wrap your mind around one component, they jump into a completely different component/level and you have no choice but to go with them, or you'll be lost. Thus IMO you never develop a true understanding and enjoyment of each scene.

For movies that inspire a lot of thought and have a very complex storyline such as Inception, I think it works much better at a slower pace which would allow the audience to do what it's intending the audience to do: digest the storyline and think. Because everything was so fast-paced, the viewer doesn't get a chance to get wrapped up in it IMO.

I'll definitely watch it again at some point, and I'm pretty sure it's one of those movies that gets better the more times you watch it and can develop an appreciation for the complexity of it, in my mind it did not become a "cult classic" that I thought it had the potential to become.

It's wierd ... it was a long-arse movie, but ironically I feel like it was rushed.
This post was edited on 7/18/10 at 8:00 pm
Posted by DanglingFury
Living the dream
Member since Dec 2007
20466 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Did you do well with Dungeons and Dragons? How many times have your read The Hobbitt and Lord of the Rings?


I'm not honest, but you're a good poster.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67435 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 9:00 pm to


Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10675 posts
Posted on 7/18/10 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

To plant inception, but it's inception is not real having to go 3 layers deep is only bc Nolan wants to have twists and such. Could have made the movie without all of that.


The film explains that you have to go deep enough into the subconscious for such an idea to manifest itself and grow naturally within the subjects minds.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram