Started By
Message

re: WSOP 2019

Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:05 pm to
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6516 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Pocket Kingz


GTO maximizes value assuming the opponent is also playing GTO.

As the opponent deviates from GTO playing to exploit the opponents weakness becomes more profitable. The obvious risk is that you open yourself up to be exploited by other players by changing gears to exploit the weaker players at the table

The top level players on the high roller circuit are not as good as some more veteran players at making these adjustments in tournaments like the WSOP ME
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6516 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

Just hope Mike is clean I know he owed Negraneu a good chunk of money and never paid him back


Negreanu was on Mike's podcast for like a 2 hour interview right before the series. They're good now.
Posted by lsufan112001
sportsmans paradise
Member since Oct 2006
10705 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:07 pm to
Another raise to 65000. Geez. Someone do it just a lil different
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16315 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:31 pm to
I haven't been able to watch this year, did last year's champ play in the ME?
Posted by Pocket Kingz
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

GTO maximizes value assuming the opponent is also playing GTO.

As the opponent deviates from GTO playing to exploit the opponents weakness becomes more profitable. The obvious risk is that you open yourself up to be exploited by other players by changing gears to exploit the weaker players at the table

The top level players on the high roller circuit are not as good as some more veteran players at making these adjustments in tournaments like the WSOP ME




You're actually making the argument that the players who are the most succesful at playing against the best players are bad at adjustments? We will have to agree to disagree.

GTO is most effective (and absolutely necessary) when playing mid and high stakes cash games and mtts. Do some people misapply concepts? Yes. That doesn't translate to what you are saying, not even close.

Someone who learns GTO concepts can always choose not to use them and go more Exploit heavy. Other way around not so much.

And for the record, I dont base much on live High stakes MTT results for a myriad of reasons. Small player pool, equity swaps, etc.... Im actually not a fan of a player having a piece of 6 guys in a 45 player tourny.

YOud really rather have Alex Foxen or Jake Schindler on your left than Matusow? Come on bro.


This post was edited on 7/10/19 at 8:38 pm
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40552 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:40 pm to
Very poor play by Seymour there. What are the odds the opponent was slow playing a flush? Very low.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422585 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

GTO maximizes value assuming the opponent is also playing GTO.

As the opponent deviates from GTO playing to exploit the opponents weakness becomes more profitable. The obvious risk is that you open yourself up to be exploited by other players by changing gears to exploit the weaker players at the table

wut? GTO is unexploitable (if you can actually play GTO which no human can, esp live). GTO is defensive poker

the problem is you leave a lot of potential EV on the table by removing exploitation from your game
Posted by Pocket Kingz
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

wut? GTO is unexploitable (if you can actually play GTO which no human can, esp live). GTO is defensive poker

the problem is you leave a lot of potential EV on the table by removing exploitation from your game




To be fair we are entering a clusterfrick of semantics. This is the statement that I took umbrage with:

quote:

The top level players on the high roller circuit are not as good as some more veteran players at making these adjustments in tournaments like the WSOP ME


This feels like Hellmuth fanboying 100%. Which is funny since out of that old guard of exploitative players, Negreanu has had the most recent success because he added GTO and modern theory into his game.

Hell, in Negreanu's "masterclass" his coaches basically are disciples of Doug Polk's online system.
This post was edited on 7/10/19 at 8:55 pm
Posted by Pocket Kingz
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

GTO is unexploitable (if you can actually play GTO which no human can, esp live)


He is correct on this point: GTO assumes everyone is playing GTO in theory. This is obviously a waste at low stakes cash games and alot of mtts.

There was also a fad a few years back where young guys who didnt really grasp the concepts were going crazy with 3-betting and with c-betting. I absolutely did this. Its easy to just think of those type players when imagining the younger school of players.

Anyone who is good enough to play stakes and levels that require GTO, succesfully, is good enough to factor in their opponents tendencies.
Posted by Pocket Kingz
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:18 pm to
Holy frick. Just no. Damnit Seymour.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51680 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:21 pm to
You either put him on a set or a bluff. He went with his read
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422585 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:25 pm to
when i got back in a few years ago it was hard to turn off live poker brain when playing online. why i switched to omaha

quote:

This feels like Hellmuth fanboying 100%.

tournaments are a terrible way to judge players, generally

there is too much randomness and specific play to the exact situations of tournaments

also i think high stakes cash guys have a better set of results in tournies than the main tourney guys (see: Jason "bad reg" Mercier) do in cash games. i think adjusting to smaller BB stacks is easier than deep stack (and you almost never see deep stack poker in tournies)
Posted by Pocket Kingz
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

You either put him on a set or a bluff. He went with his read


He was definitely including JJ (which means should include QQ) as we heard him actually say JJ while thinking.

Would he really jam a set on the dryest board ever? If he jams a straight draw there he might jam JJ and QQ so idk.

Seymour went to pure instinct and when that is not refined fear takes over. The money probably means nothing to Seymour but nobody wants to look silly on TV.
Posted by Charlito
Member since Oct 2007
1005 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:01 pm to
He just made himself look silly with the tank muck
Posted by Pocket Kingz
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:03 pm to
Seymour played that hand perfectly. He lost the min.

Huge mistake by Cudos there. How the frick does he check there?
Posted by Charlito
Member since Oct 2007
1005 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:05 pm to
He did nothing wrong in the hand. Sitting there holding his cards for a minute afterwards was silly.

It’s a terrible check especially when the ace is bad for Seymour’s range as well. He’s hoping Seymour has A-10 he may check anyway since he checked back top 2 earlier
Posted by Pocket Kingz
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:12 pm to
yeah, the ace river induced some kind of donk thought process but still..... Even taking Seymours nitcheck with top 2 earlier and his fold with the tens out of consideration, how many player are betting into a 4 liner after leading the turn?

Only thing that calls a check raise on the river is QJ or some weirdly played 7x. Cudos shite the bed.

Posted by Double Oh
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
17824 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Seymour played that hand perfectly. He lost the min.

Huge mistake by Cudos there. How the frick does he check there?




Looked like he was wanting to check raise
Posted by Double Oh
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
17824 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:49 pm to
Is the guy from Lafayette still in?
Posted by icegator337
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2013
3497 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 9:27 am to
if you're talking about Daniel Holmes he's out, finished 250th
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram