Started By
Message

re: Would you have put Flacco in?

Posted on 1/7/19 at 5:44 pm to
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
35402 posts
Posted on 1/7/19 at 5:44 pm to
I would have put him in. But I understand why they didn’t.
I probably would have put Flacco in to throw a backward pass to Jackson so he could run or throw downfield or to just throw of the defense enough to call timeout or something.

Funny thing is how good Flacco was to start the season. Then he was bad all of a sudden.

I feel bad for Ravens fans. Jackson seems forced into that spot and he’s not a good enough passer to win games. He will have to improve his accuracy for the Ravens to be successful. Kind of reminds me of the Bortles situation.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14906 posts
Posted on 1/7/19 at 6:09 pm to
I would have definitely put Flacco in. I would have given Jackson one series after the half to at least move the ball a little bit. If he couldn't, I'd give him the hook. Not because I think Flacco's better but for the reason you pointed out that the Bolts' game plan nullified Jackson. If what you're doing isn't working you got to change something. (You hear that, Les?) That said, Jackson got them back into the game so that kind of invalidates my thinking.
This post was edited on 1/7/19 at 6:27 pm
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 1/7/19 at 6:16 pm to
We discussed in the halls of Otto.

Housemate didn't think they could catch up anyhow, so don't change because it would mess with the kids self esteem.

I would have put Flacco in.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram