- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:18 pm to RightKindaGuy
quote:
...so all the flaming you have done towards TCU is irrevelant then, gotcha
Saying Wisconsin will run the ball down their throat and questioning someone using TCU's defensive rank is flaming?
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:20 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
but but but TCU is a crappy team that hasnt played anybody booo fricking hooo
They played Baylor, that's a better opponent than Va Tech, right?
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:21 pm to KillerNut9
according to your theory that "the past is irrelevant" id say yes--- you are talking out two sides of your arse here--- one cant slam TCUs competition in one post and then claim the the past doesnt matter in another.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:25 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
Im still curious, I asked in another thread but is it just a calling card of your or does your caps lock get sutck occasionally?
It's PEEEJ's trademarkPosted on 12/7/10 at 12:27 pm to Bleeding purple
I think we can agree that the Big Ten is a better conference than the MWC. With that said, better stat rankings in an easier conference does not automatically mean TCU is somehow better.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that TCU's defense wouldnt be #1 if they played in the Big Ten. I don't think that is a huge leap to make. Can you really disagree Purple?
I am going to go out on a limb and say that TCU's defense wouldnt be #1 if they played in the Big Ten. I don't think that is a huge leap to make. Can you really disagree Purple?
This post was edited on 12/7/10 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:28 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:
It's PEEEJ's trademark
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:29 pm to Bleeding purple
Wisconsin's size and experience on the offensive line will neutralize TCU's speed on defense. They should be able to pound the ball at them with their big backs all night. I really like TCU and I think Andy Dalton is probably the third best QB in college, but I got burned taking them last year against Boise So I'm taking Wisky plus the points.
If the line moves in a big way towards wisconsin I might play TCU and try to middle it, but it would have to move a lot.
If the line moves in a big way towards wisconsin I might play TCU and try to middle it, but it would have to move a lot.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:29 pm to JG77056
quote:
Andy Dalton is probably the third best QB in college
Woah now...
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:30 pm to dukke v
quote:
I have ZERO problem with a fan pumping himself up to think his team is better than they really are. However you seem the type that will have a shitload of excuses if Wisky whips TCU'S arse. Just an observation.
LOl you crack me up, some people have stated why they think Wisconsin would win; but so far you have given ZERO reason why you think they would win...bringing up "inferior competition" every time. Do you really think Wisconsin played a MUCH better competition? Here is the strength of schedule comparison by a few computers used by the BCS
Sagarin Wisc (71st). TCU(82nd)
Massey Wisc (43rd). TCU (49th)
Anderson and Hester Wisc(36th). TCU (62nd)
Colley Wisc (74th) TCU (91st)
Sure TCU has a worse record, but Wisconsin's has been pretty crappy as well. TCU had ONE faux-pas all year long, that was after the win against Utah, but even after falling down 0-14 early they scored 37 straight just to see that lead close out in the final minutes.
And people talking about size and technique: guess how many defensive players TCU put in the 2 first rounds of the draft this year. They have have a legit defense.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:31 pm to RightKindaGuy
quote:
one cant slam TCUs competition in one post and then claim the the past doesnt matter in another.
He's strictly looking and comparing how TCU or Wisconsin did against different opponents throughout the season and using TCU's rankings as an argument. I'm saying their ranking doesn't hold as much water because of who they have played. Am I viewing the past? Technically, yes. But all I'm really saying is the #1 defense argument is stupid looking at the offenses they play. I'm not going back and analyzing game by game stats through Wisky and TCU's bad opponents.
This post was edited on 12/7/10 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:34 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
#1 defense argument is stupid looking at the offenses they play.
any stat rank is uncomparable between the two teams
This post was edited on 12/7/10 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:34 pm to JG77056
quote:
If the line moves in a big way towards wisconsin I might play TCU and try to middle it, but it would have to move a lot.
with all the love you see Wisconsin getting and with a full month almost to go, I predict Wisconsin could easily be a 2.5 to 3 point fav by then. Reminds me of the Boise-VT line.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:34 pm to castorinho
quote:
LOl you crack me up, some people have stated why they think Wisconsin would win; but so far you have given ZERO reason why you think they would win...bringing up "inferior competition" every time
Where in this thread have I said any of this?????
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:38 pm to Kid Charlemagne
quote:
Woah now...
Sorry I meant 3rd best Pro prospect in college football, behind Luck and Mallet. All in my opinion. If you've waqtched them he really doesn't have a weakness.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:39 pm to castorinho
quote:
Do you really think Wisconsin played a MUCH better competition?
They played two 11-1 teams. What do you think?
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:41 pm to dukke v
quote:
Where in this thread have I said any of this?????
My mistake. It wasn't in this thread, but you said it in the "BCS scores predictions" thread.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:42 pm to JG77056
I've honestly really only gotten to see Tcu play once. That was the Fiesta Bowl. I just came away unimpressed honestly. Sure they had some good players littered on the field out there, but as a whole I just didn't think they were that impressive. Dalton looked AWFUL and so did their running game. If I remember correctly, I don't think they rushed for more than 40 yards the whole game. I know it was only one game, but it just left a bad taste in my mouth. That said, we looked awful against Boise State too. 
Oregon.
ETA: I know I shouldn't judge this year's team based on that game, but unfortunately it is the only game I have seen. Tcu doesn't get broadcasted much in these regions.
Oregon. ETA: I know I shouldn't judge this year's team based on that game, but unfortunately it is the only game I have seen. Tcu doesn't get broadcasted much in these regions.
This post was edited on 12/7/10 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:44 pm to JG77056
quote:
3rd best Pro prospect in college football, behind Luck and Mallet.
Posted on 12/7/10 at 12:50 pm to Kid Charlemagne
quote:
I've honestly really only gotten to see Tcu play once. That was the Fiesta Bowl. I just came away unimpressed honestly.
I had no clue Oregon would be playing in the MNC after watching them in the Rose Bowl
quote:
ETA: I know I shouldn't judge this year's team based on that game, but unfortunately it is the only game I have seen. Tcu doesn't get broadcasted much in these regions.
Fair enough.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News