- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:54 pm to TxTiger82
Gordon wasn't even best back in conference though
***obligatory Coleman plug***
***obligatory Coleman plug***
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:55 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Wrong. When the helmets collide after contact it isn't targeting
The rule is targeting a defenseless player above the shoulder. The helmet to helmet thing is a clear indicator but not the point of the rule. You can hit a defenseless player in the head with your shoulder and be ejected for targeting.
It is remarkable how many people don't understand this. It happens literally every time a player is ejected for targeting on this board.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:55 pm to lob1284
quote:
Except he didn't hit him above the shoulder.
Uh, yes he did. That was the clear part of the play.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:55 pm to TxTiger82
Going into this game, I was find with OSU getting left out since I thought this game may be close...now I'll burn the town down haha
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:56 pm to TxTiger82
He wasn't defenseless though
If he was id agree he had made a move to chase.
If he was id agree he had made a move to chase.
This post was edited on 12/6/14 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:56 pm to Buckeye06
there will be riots if we get left out
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:56 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
TxTiger82
you are incorrect.
Rule 9-1-3: Targeting and initiating contact with the crown of the helmet. No player shall target and initiate contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. When in question, it is a foul.
Rule 9-1-4: Targeting and initiating contact to head or neck area of a defenseless player. No player shall target and initiate contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, fist, elbow or shoulder. When in question, it is a foul.
Contact was initiated with the shoulder to the chest...helmet to helmet was incidental.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:57 pm to dlmast87
quote:
Rule 9-1-4: Targeting and initiating contact to head or neck area of a defenseless player. No player shall target and initiate contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, fist, elbow or shoulder. When in question, it is a foul.
Do you even realize that the information you posted supports what I've been saying? Wow you are not too smart.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:58 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Uh, yes he did. That was the clear part of the play.
No, 84's shoulder made contact with the front of the Wisconsin players left shoulder, not above it.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:58 pm to dlmast87
I am notxa Buckeye fan but so inpressed tonight. Crime if they are left out. Bye bye TCU
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:58 pm to sms151t
quote:
He wasn't defenseless though
That part is up for interpretation, I guess. The refs and replay officials thought he was.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:59 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Do you even realize that the information you posted supports what I've been saying? Wow you are not too smart.
Ummm....yes I realize you were saying that but contact was not above the shoulder...seriously.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 8:59 pm to TxTiger82
Super cute Big 10 commercial!
Posted on 12/6/14 at 9:01 pm to lob1284
quote:
No, 84's shoulder made contact with the front of the Wisconsin players left shoulder, not above it.
It was reviewed.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 9:02 pm to dlmast87
quote:
Ummm....yes I realize you were saying that but contact was not above the shoulder...seriously.
That's not what you said, and it was reviewed.
Posted on 12/6/14 at 9:02 pm to TxTiger82
I think the defenseless part is what they used, not location of hit.
I think it's a bad call. As IMO he had made a play to chase the carrier.
I think it's a bad call. As IMO he had made a play to chase the carrier.
This post was edited on 12/6/14 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 12/6/14 at 9:04 pm to sms151t
Get owned Wiscy
Posted on 12/6/14 at 9:07 pm to BuckYoshi
This is the first OSU game I've ever been impressed by! 
Posted on 12/6/14 at 9:08 pm to sms151t
If the play happened on the other side of the field it's nothing more than a great block.
Page 12 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News