Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why do playoff stats not count for career stats in major sports?

Posted on 10/19/25 at 6:52 pm
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29178 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 6:52 pm
I know this is true for NFL and MLB, I assume NBA as well. I understand not counting them for the season, as teams play different amounts of games when the playoffs are included. As for career, it makes no sense to me. These aren’t all star exhibitions. Hell, these games are usually going to be more competitive.

I don’t understand why you can use postseason games as a negative when it comes to wear and tear on a player, but not use the positives for career performance.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466336 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 7:04 pm to
Playoff opportunities are primarily team stats and it skews individual comparisons too much
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62280 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 7:06 pm to
Man, it’s ok to not have an answer
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60782 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

I don’t understand why you can use postseason games as a negative when it comes to wear and tear on a player


You don’t understand why it’s more physically grueling on a human body to play 20-21 FB games instead of 16-17 or 100+ basketball games instead of 82? Really?

quote:

but not use the positives for career performance.


Not sure if you are from an alternate time line but in mine people doing fact use playoff performance to judge players. Eli Manning is would never be remotely considered for the HOF if no one considered playoff performance and there are many other examples hall of fames are full of good not great players that just happened be on really good teams that won a lot, so i really don’t know what the hell you are talking about.

Statistics from playoff games should not be added to regular season stats because as was just said it’s a product of team how far players gets


This post was edited on 10/19/25 at 7:26 pm
Posted by JerryTheKingBawler
South of Memphis
Member since Jan 2023
7552 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

Statistics from playoff games should not be added to regular season stats because as was just said it’s a product of team how far players gets

No cap. These baws doing anything tryna lift BIG DUMPER over THE JUDGE.
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
5080 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

Eli Manning is would never be remotely considered for the HOF if no one considered playoff performance


Ehh...he had 57,000 yards and 370 TDs. That's 11th on the list between Marino and Elway and everyone with better stats is or will be in the HOF. I admit he's a bit borderline by modern standards and without the two rings and last name he's fighting to get in, but he would definitely be "considered" and probably be considered a 50/50 prospect.

Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53778 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

but he would definitely be "considered" and probably be considered a 50/50 prospect.
he’s what they call a compiler… more a baseball term but it applies here. He wasn’t really in the top tier of QBs in any given year.

Without the rings he’s Vinny Testaverde
This post was edited on 10/19/25 at 7:39 pm
Posted by Underwood
Member since Dec 2022
1190 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 8:02 pm to
quote:


I know this is true for NFL and MLB, I assume NBA as well. I understand not counting them for the season, as teams play different amounts of games when the playoffs are included. As for career, it makes no sense to me. These aren’t all star exhibitions. Hell, these games are usually going to be more competitive.

I don’t understand why you can use postseason games as a negative when it comes to wear and tear on a player, but not use the positives for career performance.



Shouldn't count together.

Playoffs are a tournament to determine the best team

Baseball came first of the Big 4, the World Series was started to determine the best teams from two leagues.

This post was edited on 10/19/25 at 8:04 pm
Posted by DoctorWorm
Member since Jul 2021
1527 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 10:14 pm to
bc you want to use stats to compare apples to apples i.e. how good is a baseball player over 162 games. so an average player on a good team year after year can have quantitative stats that could equal a really good player on a bad team that never makes playoffs
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 10:45 pm to
Eli never led the league in anything but INTs
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
5080 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Playoff opportunities are primarily team stats and it skews individual comparisons too much


Does it though? Would any records change? Would any of our current "all-time" perceptions change with a few more numbers mixed in? I just feel like the great players still look great and the bad players still look bad. It doesn't move the needle enough to matter that much career wise and "you play the game to win" so the let the stats reflect that. Just my $.02.





Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29178 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 10:56 pm to
No. I want to use them for career totals. Hank Aaron has 755 career home runs, but also has 6 in the postseason. He should have 761 career home runs when comparing all time stats.

Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29178 posts
Posted on 10/19/25 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

You don’t understand why it’s more physically grueling on a human body to play 20-21 FB games instead of 16-17 or 100+ basketball games instead of 82? Really?


You literally quoted part of my statement to argue this. My stance is, if you throw for 12 TDS in the playoffs, those should be added to your career total in terms of the record books

.
quote:

so i really don’t know what the hell you are talking about.


The title pretty much says it all

quote:

Statistics from playoff games should not be added to regular season stats because as was just said it’s a product of team how far players gets


I don’t think it should count for a single season total per se, just career stats. You already said it’s more grueling to play in 20-21 games versus 17. Those are competitive games.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60782 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 7:39 am to
quote:

You literally quoted part of my statement to argue this.


You worded that very poorly then, you said you don’t understand why post season games count as a negative when it comes to wear and tear. It’s not used as a negative against a player so much as it is just a fact of life.

quote:

I don’t think it should count for a single season total per se, just career stats.


Again, post season games are a product of team, it would distort career totals especially toward players on goood teams, post season stats are a separate category, they are recognized when evaluating players careers

Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60782 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 7:46 am to
quote:

he’s what they call a compiler… more a baseball term but it applies here. He wasn’t really in the top tier of QBs in any given year.


100% this. He was never close to all pro let alone mvp. Never lead the league is a positive stat. In 16 years made the playoffs 6 times 4 of those were 0-1.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram