- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is the greatest golfer ever: Tiger or Jack?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 1:30 pm to slackster
Posted on 4/16/18 at 1:30 pm to slackster
quote:
Who had the better career PJ - Tom Watson or Arnold Palmer?
Tom was an alcoholic and divorced. Arnold smoked and cheated on his wife. The real question is if either of them ever spit on the course.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 1:37 pm to lsufball19
It came up on the msn feed of my browser main page interestingly enough so I thought I’d post it.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 3:23 pm to lsufball19
Jack>>>>>>>>Tiger.... in all phases...
Posted on 4/16/18 at 3:37 pm to dukke v
Oweo >>>>>>> than PJ IN ALL PHASES
Posted on 4/16/18 at 3:45 pm to dukke v
quote:
Jack>>>>>>>>Tiger.... in all phases...
Peej, the question was comparing Watson to Palmer
Posted on 4/16/18 at 3:54 pm to lsufball19
quote:My thoughts as well. “It’s not close but here’s how a washed up 42 year old Woods can still pass Jack.” Regardless of which player you pick it, nobody can say it’s not close. Honestly tiger has said himself it’s all about majors. His career has fallen short of his own expectations. Because of that it’s fair to say that Jack is still on top and I don’t think tiger would challenge that. Fortunately for tiger every other aspect of his career was so legendary that he will inevitably be viewed as the greatest golfer ever despite failing to live up to his own standard.
the article kind of contradicts itself and its conclusion isn't really supported by the rest of the article. They conclude it's not close but give Tiger the edge in almost every category they analyzed. The conclusion doesn't even make sense. They say that Tiger would only need 2 major wins and 8 tournament wins to pass Jack as goat. How is that not close? Their field argument also doesn't make sense if Tiger only needs 2 more. If Tiger played against a weaker field, as they allege, then one would surmise he'd need more than 18 to match Jack
Posted on 4/16/18 at 3:57 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Watson to Palmer
I want to say Palmer off legend status but I’m not going to even try to claim I know enough about Palmer or Watson as I wasn’t Watson fan and too young to watched Arnie. So I’ll say Curtis Strange just because he looked like Bobby Knight.
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:53 pm to sms151t
quote:
So I’ll say Curtis Strange just because he looked like Bobby Knight.
He was/is an a-hole like Knight too
Posted on 4/17/18 at 9:47 pm to Buck Magnum
The GOAT!
Jack!
Also, if the current pros are in awe, that should say something as well.
Current Pros in awe of Jack’s records!
Jack!
Also, if the current pros are in awe, that should say something as well.
Current Pros in awe of Jack’s records!
This post was edited on 4/17/18 at 9:55 pm
Popular
Back to top


3







