Started By
Message

re: Which duo would you rather: Antetokounmpo/Parker or Wiggins/KAT

Posted on 12/24/16 at 1:30 am to
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
24999 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 1:30 am to
Jabroni and Jabroni











KAT
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112857 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:15 am to
quote:

Because Wiggins isn't nearly the player people expected him to be and that people still imagine him to be. He's not good.

Remember all the folks who claimed victory on calling the Wiggins/Love trade bad for Cleveland?

Oops!!!!
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87508 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:32 am to
Weren't you one of them?
Posted by Toula
504
Member since Dec 2006
35405 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:35 am to
Freak/Parker all day. They have a crap supporting cast and still competitive night in and night out, even blowing away teams some nights.

Wiggins is over-hyped and flawed. KAT is turning into too much of a outside/in player.

I'd take Lavine over Wiggins right now. Even though Pels talk says Lavine is only a 6th man kinda player.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60090 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:45 am to
quote:

We still really don't know just what Wiggins is




I thought he was the next Lebron?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290870 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:55 am to
Wiggnis will never have DWades's strength, but he needs to study his game on a loop, because that is his key to becoming a more efficient player

KAT needs to stop shooting 3s.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 10:04 am to
quote:

The question should now be:
If you're Minnesota, do you trade Rubio, lavine, or Wiggins?


Rubio...you don't trade Wiggins. He's 21, and people are giving up on him already? Lol...he's not an elite player but he's still an elite talent. He could develop into a Demar Derozen type, possibly better. You don't deal him because a team lead by guys barely old enough to drink are not winning games.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 10:04 am to
The duo that doesn't have Andrew Wiggins in it. Wiggins is Rudy Gay 2.0. A team will never be a championship contender if they expect that guy to be one of their building blocks.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 10:15 am to
Wiggins currently isn't very good but man, a lot of y'all are going to look pretty dumb if he figures it out. He's, what, 21?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290870 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 10:24 am to
this is true. Wiggins has more upside than Parker does
Posted by floridatigah
FL
Member since Oct 2004
10398 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 10:35 am to
I don't think anybody thinks he sucks but I'm pretty confident he won't ever be a top 10 player.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112857 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Weren't you one of them?

No
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 12/24/16 at 4:31 pm to
I've always thought levine was more untouchable than Wiggins. He he a larger offensive arsenal, a better shooter, just as explosive, justna year older and fits the mold of second man than wigging, who still is under the impression that the wolves are his team. Not only that but than you don't have to worry about resigning him.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram