re: What would you accept if you had Arod's 3,000th hit ball?

Money. Lots of money. Not a fricking chance I'm doing it out of the kindness of my heart. A-Rod or the Yankees would have to outbid everyone else to get that ball from me.

quote:

---

l for one there is no guarantee you would get 6 figures like many people keep saying, especially with the allegations

---

I don't get what the allegations are. Did he catch the ball or not? Seems like that should be all that matters

quote:

---

Two not everyone is in desperate need of money and therefore wouldn't hold the ball hostage. 3

---

You don't have to be desperate for money to not be stupid enough to turn down that kind of money to be a nice guy.

quote:

---

maybe people are just view baseball and what it is worth differently

---

Objectively that just makes them stupid.

quote:

---

not everyone is an a-hole

---

Multimillionaire wants a 50 k ball for his trophy case, but wants it for free from a middle class working fan and the fan is the a-hole?

Free market is what made Arod rich, he can use the same process to get his ball back.

quote:

---

So now you're objectively stupid if you don't demand money for the ball?

---

Financially at the very least, yes.


Giving away the ball doesn't make you a stupid person. But giving it away is an objectively stupid decision.

How do you figure?

Go on with your analysis to the objectively stupid part.

That's not really crawfishing. I assumed no one would think that I meant that you are literally an uneducated person because you let emotion cloud your judgement

Plenty of smart people let that happen. But objectively it's frickin stupid

Giving away 50,000 dollars for free just so a millionaire can fill his trophy case is stupid. That's not an opinion, that's fact.

It's a irresponsible decision that 90 percent of people can't afford to make.

Alright

sell sell sell