- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What do you do with Tannehill if you’re the Titans?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:19 am to lsupride87
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:19 am to lsupride87
quote:
melt
Most overused and misused word on this site. I mean are you denying that you come up with spreadsheets to inject specific QB into conversations for no reason? Because a history says you do. Just like your Matthieu/Bama saga this weekend, that is odd.
2
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:21 am to sms151t
quote:I made a thread talking about brady/brees/rodgers/manning in which I personally started the thread and conversation with a spreadsheet, yes
I mean are you denying that you come up with spreadsheets to inject specific QB into conversations for no reason?
And now you are melting about it because I pointed out Tannehills air yards per completion. Its weird, and its melty
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 11:22 am
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:31 am to sms151t
quote:You're probably right about the term "melt" but you can't really deny that you derailed the thread and topic he was discussing(which again, was a good counterpoint to those saying he just checks down a lot) only for you to bring up something that has absolutely nothing to do with anything in the thread...then doubled and tripled down on it.
Most overused and misused word on this site. I mean are you denying that you come up with spreadsheets to inject specific QB into conversations for no reason? Because a history says you do
It might not be a "melt" but I'd think if you look at this rationally, even you'd agree it shows you're a little caught up in Pride and some spreadsheets he posted a long time ago, so much so that you went off topic to bring it up and kept going on and on about it.
It was definitely odd and weird timing on your part.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:46 am to baldona
Tannehill out played Brees this year.
The Titans made it to the AFCCG without their top tight end and with their top WR being a rookie. They need to make the following moves:
Resign Tannehill and Henry.
Sign/draft a complimentary back like McFarland/CEH/Eno
Pick up another TE.
Sign/draft another pass rusher.
Convince Mariota that he’s not a starting quarterback but can be used as an all-purpose offensive weapon a la Taysom Hill, but with real talent.
The Titans made it to the AFCCG without their top tight end and with their top WR being a rookie. They need to make the following moves:
Resign Tannehill and Henry.
Sign/draft a complimentary back like McFarland/CEH/Eno
Pick up another TE.
Sign/draft another pass rusher.
Convince Mariota that he’s not a starting quarterback but can be used as an all-purpose offensive weapon a la Taysom Hill, but with real talent.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 12:08 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
I have a feeling they're gonna get Bridgwater
Posted on 1/20/20 at 12:10 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
I'd rather take a chance with Eason. He has far more potential than Fromm.
Tannehill is like Kirk Cousins. You know what you are getting and where the ceiling is at. I just don't think you can ever win it all with either QB.
Regarding Fromm and Eason...
I'd stay away from Fromm as well. He isn't that good imo.
Also, the Titans previously signed Mettenberger. Eason isn't that different imo.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News