- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update on girl struck by foul ball in Houston
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:31 pm to gobuxgo5
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:31 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:Or just extend the net..
How about banning kids from 3rd base line if the parents refuse to not put them in harms way? Make those seats 18+ of age.
Adults can't be hit by a baseball?
0
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:32 pm to shel311
Well my logic agrees with the current construction of the stadiums as they are and the reaction time needed for behind the dugout or where the current netting is versus where it currently isn’t
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:34 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:And that's likely going to change in the future, so...
Well my logic agrees with the current construction
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:36 pm to shel311
So it’ll stop being in agreement when that happens?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:38 pm to gobuxgo5
Are you for removing netting behind homeplate? Using your logic, it is forching others to watch behind a net.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:47 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I really beleive that I don’t beleive in drastic measures to save 1 life. I do beleive in simply putting up a fricking net to save one for
3 times. 3 fricking times. It's believe.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:50 pm to shel311
I guess I can repeat myself in summary. I agree with the current setup and think the due diligence and studies were conducted for reaction / safety concerns in factoring how big the current net is.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:51 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:So you don't believe that extending a very simple net that will obviously keep people safer is worth it just because.
I guess I can repeat myself in summary. I agree with the current setup and think the due diligence and studies were conducted for reaction / safety concerns in factoring how big the current net is.
Agree to disagree.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:58 pm to shel311
I believe in making speed limits on highways 25 mph and saving 8,000 children per year if we net up the ballpark to save 1. Why are you against saving thousands?
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:03 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:
So you don't believe that extending a very simple net that will obviously keep people safer is worth it just because.
quote:
I believe in making speed limits on highways 25 mph and saving 8,000 children per year if we net up the ballpark to save
quote:
gobuxgo5
Why are you shitting up this thread just because you said something stupid and now are too stubborn to admit it or just go away?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:04 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:There you go again, comparing making speed limits 25mph to extending netting.
I believe in making speed limits on highways 25 mph and saving 8,000 children per year if we net up the ballpark to save 1. Why are you against saving thousands?
Apples and oranges, man. How did you possibly type that out without realizing that? That's amazing to me.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:09 pm to martiallaw
quote:
Your looking a about 1750 injuries to fans per year at MLB parks.
You got a link for that number?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:40 pm to Wayne Campbell
He’s counting flesh wounds
Abrasions, subcutaneous bleeding (bruising)
Obviously an attorney that has never seen a court room
He should represent teams vs parents that neglect their kids, but he’s not good enough and there’s no money in that. LOL
Abrasions, subcutaneous bleeding (bruising)
Obviously an attorney that has never seen a court room
He should represent teams vs parents that neglect their kids, but he’s not good enough and there’s no money in that. LOL
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:41 pm to Wayne Campbell
i didn't know how many people on this board have season tickets down the first and third base lines. let's take it down from behind the plate, it obstructs their views back there!
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:45 pm to quail man
In a game where the action is just as close if not closer (hockey), you barely notice the netting at a game.
This needs to happen.
This needs to happen.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:48 pm to bwallcubfan
I actually attend a few games a year in different parks. I would hate to see nets every where. shite is already expensive. Last thing I want is to have my view obstructed
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:49 pm to KosmoCramer
Only a real deal POS would have a problem with extending the netting to protect people. All of the reasons not to, and comparisons from that crowd are stupid.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:52 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:
I just think using common since and choosing the 90% of the seats that are completely safe is the proper decision versus forcing others to watch behind a net.
That would be too easy, I mean players just started hitting hard foul balls the last couple years.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:56 pm to AbitaFan08
Ok
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:58 pm to tzimme4
quote:
Says on the ticket to be aware at your own risk.
Typical dipshit Cubs fan. No surprise there.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News