- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: U-HIGH football being investigated by LHSAA for Ineligible Player
Posted on 11/5/24 at 2:59 pm to BlackJack02
Posted on 11/5/24 at 2:59 pm to BlackJack02
The development side for Green I understand, just not sure why he didn’t have to sit out being that he changed schools
2
Posted on 11/5/24 at 3:27 pm to cmoxon
Green couldn't play basketball because his AAU team had a coach that was also on staff for the Zachary Basketball team but he was eligible for football.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 4:07 pm to cmoxon
Moved into zone
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:18 pm to bigdubya11
Very late to this party but can't help correcting the record on this inaccurate & hypocritical remark.
You said Episcopal "started" beating U-High in 13'/14' - Wrong. U-High's last year being in a district with Episcopal was 2012/2013. U-High beat Episcopal in football, basketball & baseball that school year.
You referenced Episcopal beat them rarely. Assuming we're talking football (Because this is a football topic & for years baseball/basketball was pretty even) the only time Episcopal ever beat them in football in their last 20 matchups was 2010 which was a 7-6 victory for the mighty Knights - So once again, wrong.
You mentioned U-High said F this & took it to a higher level. That's a bit hypocritical. That's like saying, "Shame on them for bringing liquor to a beer party". Also, I PROMISE you, U-High did not decide to allow more minorities in the school because of their rare short comings against 1 school. It sounds silly to even say that out loud. LSU, their governing body, wanted them to diversify & they listened.
You mentioned they took it so far that they moved up to 3A - Wrong, their enrollment increased to the 3A level, so they moved up. & I guess when your enrollment rises, that means you have in fact "ruined a fun rivalry in sports".
Sincerely, a local sports writer that didn't even go to U-High
You said Episcopal "started" beating U-High in 13'/14' - Wrong. U-High's last year being in a district with Episcopal was 2012/2013. U-High beat Episcopal in football, basketball & baseball that school year.
You referenced Episcopal beat them rarely. Assuming we're talking football (Because this is a football topic & for years baseball/basketball was pretty even) the only time Episcopal ever beat them in football in their last 20 matchups was 2010 which was a 7-6 victory for the mighty Knights - So once again, wrong.
You mentioned U-High said F this & took it to a higher level. That's a bit hypocritical. That's like saying, "Shame on them for bringing liquor to a beer party". Also, I PROMISE you, U-High did not decide to allow more minorities in the school because of their rare short comings against 1 school. It sounds silly to even say that out loud. LSU, their governing body, wanted them to diversify & they listened.
You mentioned they took it so far that they moved up to 3A - Wrong, their enrollment increased to the 3A level, so they moved up. & I guess when your enrollment rises, that means you have in fact "ruined a fun rivalry in sports".
Sincerely, a local sports writer that didn't even go to U-High
This post was edited on 4/23/25 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:01 pm to GambinoUnderBoss
quote:
Very late to this party but can't help correcting the record on this inaccurate & hypocritical remark.
You said Episcopal "started" beating U-High in 13'/14' - Wrong. U-High's last year being in a district with Episcopal was 2012/2013. U-High beat Episcopal in football, basketball & baseball that school year.
You referenced Episcopal beat them rarely. Assuming we're talking football (Because this is a football topic & for years baseball/basketball was pretty even) the only time Episcopal ever beat them in football in their last 20 matchups was 2010 which was a 7-6 victory for the mighty Knights - So once again, wrong.
You mentioned U-High said F this & took it to a higher level. That's a bit hypocritical. That's like saying, "Shame on them for bringing liquor to a beer party". Also, I PROMISE you, U-High did not decide to allow more minorities in the school because of their rare short comings against 1 school. It sounds silly to even say that out loud. LSU, their governing body, wanted them to diversify & they listened.
You mentioned they took it so far that they moved up to 3A - Wrong, their enrollment increased to the 3A level, so they moved up. & I guess when your enrollment rises, that means you have in fact "ruined a fun rivalry in sports".
Sincerely, a local sports writer that didn't even go to U-High
Damn you bitter?
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:05 pm to GambinoUnderBoss
Strange melt
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:35 pm to GambinoUnderBoss
quote:
13'/14'
quote:
writer
Smh
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:18 pm to ATLTiger
Hell of a bump
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:58 pm to GambinoUnderBoss
I heard they paid that QB and his pops a good chunk to move to BR from MS.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 12:38 pm to sta4ever
quote:
And this is why there should be a split between public schools and private schools.
U-High is set up as a public school for people with money and influence.
Posted on 4/24/25 at 1:45 pm to Lou Loomis
quote:
I heard they paid that QB and his pops a good chunk to move to BR from MS.
fake news
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News