Started By
Message

re: Top 10 NFL playoff QB's, the way we should look at it

Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:06 am to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:06 am to
quote:

The entire premise is ranking QBs by wins or losses with no consideration to actual performance. It's terrible
It actually completely disregards losses.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:06 am to
Oh sorry, just wins. Still terrible
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112857 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:08 am to
quote:

Here's your top ten playoff quarterbacks of all time 
Not quite, just the QBs who have been on the top 10 most successful teams based on your calculations.

They're not one in the same.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:09 am to
quote:

I feel like earning a bye week in the playoffs should get some players like Peyton Manning more praise. That's pretty much like earning a win during the first round of the playoffs.
This is exactly right. Citing playoff record alone is to say that winning in the wild card round and losing in the divisional round is somehow better than getting a bye and losing in the divisional round, when in fact they are essentially exactly the same.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:13 am to
Kurt Warner throwing for 377 yards, 3 TDs and a 112 rating in a loss - 0 points

Terry Bradshaw throwing for 103 yards, 0 TDs, 2 interceptions and a rating of 46.8 in a win - 1 point

The way we should see it
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 12:14 am
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92839 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:14 am to
quote:

This is exactly right. Citing playoff record alone is to say that winning in the wild card round and losing in the divisional round is somehow better than getting a bye and losing in the divisional round, when in fact they are essentially exactly the same.
Yea, I mean people like to rag on Peyton Manning for going "one and done" in the playoffs, but most of the time it happened after he earned a bye during the first week. If we fixed his, and any other quarterback's, playoff record to include byes as wins, how would everyone compare then?
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:35 am to
quote:

Yea, I mean people like to rag on Peyton Manning for going "one and done" in the playoffs, but most of the time it happened after he earned a bye during the first week. If we fixed his, and any other quarterback's, playoff record to include byes as wins, how would everyone compare then?

That's what I did in the OP. A team who loses in the divisional (2nd) round gets 2 points whether or not they earned a bye.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 12:39 am to
quote:

rating
Disregards the most important stat there is.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111439 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Kurt Warner throwing for 377 yards, 3 TDs and a 112 rating in a loss - 0 points

Terry Bradshaw throwing for 103 yards, 0 TDs, 2 interceptions and a rating of 46.8 in a win - 1 point

The way we should see it
This is why judging a QB or any player by wins and losses in a 22 man sport is asinine. It is something that should stop once someone enters 3rd grade
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29217 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:29 am to
Compare Montana's post-season stats to Brady's. Montana is better. Especially in the Super Bowl. And Brady plays in a much more passing QB-friendly era.

Montana: 11TDs-0INTS plus 2 rushing TDs in 4 SBs. 4-0

Brady: 9TDs-2INTs and 0 rushing TDs in 5 SBs. 3-2
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 8:40 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111439 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Kurt Warner throwing for 377 yards, 3 TDs and a 112 rating in a loss - 0 points

Terry Bradshaw throwing for 103 yards, 0 TDs, 2 interceptions and a rating of 46.8 in a win - 1 point
Yeh but what you cant see is the "it" factor. While Warner was throwing for over 300 yards and tds, his ball didnt have "it" on it. While bradhsaw barely made it the length of the field and had two ints, the balls he threw had "it" all over them. Just had "it" man. The "it" factor you know- -signed MSB morons
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Top 10 NFL playoff QB's


Ok, so we're ranking QBs based on how well they do in the playoffs...

quote:

Losing in the playoffs 7 times is better than sitting at home 7 Januarys


I respectfully disagree. Making the playoffs and losing 7 times speaks to how good Manning has been in the regular season compared to Warner, but it is most definitely a knock on his playoff performances. There is no other way to spin it.

Granted, I'd rather my QB make the playoffs rather than miss them, but that is a measure of regular season success. If this thread is a measure of playoff success only, then you cannot ignore losses IMO.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:10 am to
So the best way to measure a QB's quality is by measuring his team's quality.

Gotcha.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:12 am to
quote:

This is exactly right. Citing playoff record alone is to say that winning in the wild card round and losing in the divisional round is somehow better than getting a bye and losing in the divisional round, when in fact they are essentially exactly the same




QB A makes 10 playoffs as a wildcard, and wins the wildcard round every single time. He then proceeds to lose in the divisional round every single time. 10-10 record.

QB B makes 10 playoffs with a bye each time, but loses in the divisional round every single time. 0-10 playoff record.

Your logic would tell me that they are equal, when in fact, they certainly are not. In the regular season, it appears that QB B and his team are better. In the playoffs, it appears that QB A and his team are better. This thread is discussing playoff success, so I'd give the nod to QB A.

Granted, I'm not trying to make the case that QB A is far and away the better QB, because neither has ever made it to the conference championship, but I cannot fathom a world where you can make the case that QB B is the best option.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111439 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:19 am to
quote:

QB A makes 10 playoffs as a wildcard, and wins the wildcard round every single time. He then proceeds to lose in the divisional round every single time. 10-10 record.

QB B makes 10 playoffs with a bye each time, but loses in the divisional round every single time. 0-10 playoff record.

Your logic would tell me that they are equal, when in fact, they certainly are not. In the regular season, it appears that QB B and his team are better. In the playoffs, it appears that QB A and his team are better. This thread is discussing playoff success, so I'd give the nod to QB A.

Granted, I'm not trying to make the case that QB A is far and away the better QB, because neither has ever made it to the conference championship, but I cannot fathom a world where you can make the case that QB B is the best option.
I dont see how anyone with a brain can make a judgement on either QB by just looking at wins and losses.
Posted by goldenbadger08
Sorting Out MSB BS Since 2011
Member since Oct 2011
37909 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:21 am to
How would you tally someone like Bart Starr who won 3 NFL championships before there was a Super Bowl game?
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 9:21 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I dont see how anyone with a brain can make a judgement on either QB by just looking at wins and losses


I agree.

The OP, however, is trying to make that judgement. My example is directed at his attempt, and hopefully I was able to illustrate that even if you're going to just look at wins and/or wins and losses, his methodology is flawed IMO.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
12144 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 10:27 am to
I think a Super Bowl win should be weighted a bit heavier. Two points instead of one maybe.
Posted by WalkingTurtles
Alexandria
Member since Jan 2013
5913 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 11:51 am to
Warner also made three trips to the Super Bowl with two different teams. Manning has only been twice.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

How would you tally someone like Bart Starr who won 3 NFL championships before there was a Super Bowl game?
Tough question. I went with just Super Bowl era because of this. I don't know, really.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram