- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on the extra points from 33yards?
Posted on 8/10/14 at 11:50 pm to ballscaster
Posted on 8/10/14 at 11:50 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Your post assumes that there is something wrong with making field goals more difficult. That is a silly assumption.
It doesn't assume anything, it asserts an opinion and one about an aspect to such a rule change that went completely unmentioned.
quote:
You're playing the victim when you're the one who called the "narrowing" idea idiotic. Don't start none, won't be none.
I'm not playing a victim. This is a discussion about a football rule. I was, however, lamenting the lack of a valid response.
This post was edited on 8/10/14 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 8/10/14 at 11:58 pm to ChewyDante
quote:Yes it does. I covered this. Move on.
It doesn't assume anything,
quote:Your opinion is shite.
it asserts an opinion and one about an aspect to such a rule change that went completely unmentioned.
quote:Your lamenting sucks.
I'm not playing a victim. This is a discussion about a football rule. I was, however, lamenting the lack of a valid response.
Narrowing the goal posts fixes literally everything here. Suck my balls.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 11:58 pm to Marciano1
The Steelers and Patriots are playing for The AFC championship on a cold windy day in Foxboro. The score is tied at 13 in the 4th qtr.
Steelers score a touchdown and kick a successful 33 yard xp.
Tom Brady drives the patriots down the field with less than 2 minutes left. 30 seconds left when a touchdown is scored. But now it begins to rain or snow and there is a 20 mph crosswind.
Do you want an extra point attempt from 33 yards out to decide if you lose or possibly go into OT ?
I don't want to see a game decided like that when a championship is at stake. 1 pt kick from 33 yards in brutal conditions should not decide a true champion after two heavyweight teams battle for 60 minutes. Esp. When weather can change quickly.
Steelers score a touchdown and kick a successful 33 yard xp.
Tom Brady drives the patriots down the field with less than 2 minutes left. 30 seconds left when a touchdown is scored. But now it begins to rain or snow and there is a 20 mph crosswind.
Do you want an extra point attempt from 33 yards out to decide if you lose or possibly go into OT ?
I don't want to see a game decided like that when a championship is at stake. 1 pt kick from 33 yards in brutal conditions should not decide a true champion after two heavyweight teams battle for 60 minutes. Esp. When weather can change quickly.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 2:11 am to OutofTownAlumni
Move it back! frick chip shots
Posted on 8/11/14 at 2:32 am to MottLaneKid
The whole purpose of extra points to begin with was to make it more difficult to have a tie game after 60 minutes. Basically, it was assumed that most teams wouldn't make them with the regularity that they do now (this, of course, preceded the advent of OT).
If you really don't care for games to be decided by extra points, the more consistent line of thought would be to push for the abolition of extra point kicks altogether.
Since that doesn't appear to be in the cards, I have no problem moving the XP back. It really does reflect the original purpose of having them in the first place, as opposed to the perfunctory exercise it basically is today in the NFL.
If you really don't care for games to be decided by extra points, the more consistent line of thought would be to push for the abolition of extra point kicks altogether.
Since that doesn't appear to be in the cards, I have no problem moving the XP back. It really does reflect the original purpose of having them in the first place, as opposed to the perfunctory exercise it basically is today in the NFL.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 7:27 am to OutofTownAlumni
Not a fan yet. I like the way rugby extra points are setup. NFL could experiment at 20+ yds out. This would be interesting to me.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:46 am to OutofTownAlumni
It's like "new coke"
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:48 am to Master of Sinanju
The reason I hate it is because more games may come foeb to the kicker, which always feels lame in football.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 1:14 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
TbirdSpur2010
Your post is the first one that resonated with me.
quote:
The whole purpose of extra points to begin with was to make it more difficult to have a tie game after 60 minutes. Basically, it was assumed that most teams wouldn't make them with the regularity that they do now (this, of course, preceded the advent of OT).
I looked at NLF.com, but didn't find any content devoted to the adoption of the extra point or the reason behind it. I would want to know more about how the extra point came to be part of the game before I endorse or condemn the proposed change.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 1:17 pm to chesty
quote:
I like it, gotta earn that check.
Such an ignorant comment. I'm guessing you've never kicked a football in your life.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 1:24 pm to OutofTownAlumni
Extra points, as it currently stands, are pointless. Either back it up or do away with them altogether.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 1:27 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Extra points, as it currently stands, are pointless.
ETA: Not disagreeing at all. What is it, 99.4% conversion rate?
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 8/11/14 at 1:29 pm to 632627
quote:Then drop it altogether.
games shouldn't be won or lost on extra points
Posted on 8/11/14 at 5:48 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
The whole purpose of extra points to begin with was to make it more difficult to have a tie game after 60 minutes. Basically, it was assumed that most teams wouldn't make them with the regularity that they do now (this, of course, preceded the advent of OT).
Assuming this to be true, this would have clearly been done in an age where kicking, even from extra point distance, was a difficult task. That means kicking field goals was an even more difficult task which means scores were generally more heavily reliant on touchdowns alone, meaning ties would be more likely. With kicking being done by specialists now and the advent of the "soccer style" kick, while extra points have become virtually automatic, field goals are much more consistently scored as well and at distances up to 50 yards or more, meaning the variation in scoring is now much greater than it originally was and thus leading to less ties. The NFL does not have a problem with ties at the moment, illustrating this to be an unnecessary factor.
If the problem was the issue of ties, then that is no longer a problem and thus a "remedy" is superfluous.
quote:
Since that doesn't appear to be in the cards, I have no problem moving the XP back. It really does reflect the original purpose of having them in the first place, as opposed to the perfunctory exercise it basically is today in the NFL.
Not if the original purpose was, as you claim, to break ties.
Football games used to be low scoring, smashmouth affairs as well, but I don't think that argument is a good one for creating some new rules to mitigate the scoring increase and offensive explosion created by the refinement of the forward pass and other offensive innovations.
I wouldn't be opposed to simply awarding 7 points for a touchdown but I also have no complaints about the extra point as is.
I suppose the heart of the issue comes down to an individual's preference on how much impact they want a team's kicker to have on the outcome of the game. My preference is for it to be minimal.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 7:54 pm to OutofTownAlumni
quote:
I hope it sticks. I actually like it. 2 misses already yesterday alone. Makes the game more interesting IMO.
I agree but they should do it Rugby still and kick from the angle in which the ball crossed the endzone for the touchdown. Not always straight in line with the goal.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:53 pm to ChewyDante
quote:this is how I feel. A touchdown should be an autamatic 7 points. Either by getting rid of extra points or keeping it as it is. There's no reason to penalize a team that goes on a long sucessful drive because their kicker misses a long extra point.
I suppose the heart of the issue comes down to an individual's preference on how much impact they want a team's kicker to have on the outcome of the game. My preference is for it to be minimal.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)